Researchers discover mechanism that prevents two species from reproducing

Oct 26, 2009

Cornell researchers have discovered a genetic mechanism in fruit flies that prevents two closely related species from reproducing, a finding that offers clues to how species evolve.

When two populations of a species become geographically isolated from each other, their genes diverge from one another over time.

Eventually, when a male from one group mates with a female from the other group, the offspring will die or be born sterile, as crosses between horses and donkeys produce sterile mules. At this point, they have become two distinct species.

Now, Cornell researchers report in the October issue of Public Library of Science Biology (Vol. 7, No. 10) that rapidly evolving "junk" DNA may create incompatibilities between two related species, preventing them from reproducing. In this case, the researchers studied crosses between closely related , Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Nearly 100 years ago, scientists discovered that when male D. melanogasters mate with female D. simulans, normal males survive, but the female embryos die.

"It has remained an unsolved problem," said Patrick Ferree, the paper's lead author and a postdoctoral researcher in the lab of co-author Daniel Barbash, an assistant professor of molecular biology and genetics. "The question is, what are the elements that are killing these female hybrids and how are they doing that?"

The researchers found that the female hybrid embryos died very early in development. In most species, when the male's sperm (carrying either an X or Y chromosome) fertilizes the female's egg (containing an ), a new cell forms with a single nucleus containing a from each parent. If the offspring inherits its father's X chromosome, it becomes female; if it inherits a , it becomes male. Ferree and Barbash found that a unique segment of DNA in the father's X chromosome leads to embryo death of hybrid females.

The segment of DNA was found in the chromosome's heterochromatin, a densely packed region of highly repetitive sequences of junk DNA near the chromosome's center.

During the embryo's initial divisions, the researchers found, a specific segment of heterochromatin gets "sticky" and halts the process, preventing the entire X chromosome from separating properly; the result is that the early embryo dies.

Researchers have known that DNA in heterochromatin evolves faster than in other parts of the genome. Also, during early development, the proteins required for cell division come from the mother. The researchers speculate that the heterochromatin of the male D. melanogaster's X chromosome has rapidly evolved, such that after mating, the machinery involved in DNA packaging from a D. simulans mother no longer recognizes the D. melanogaster father's "junk" DNA, Ferree said.

The problematic region of D. melanogaster's X chromosome contains about 5 million base pairs of DNA, while the same region of D. simulans' X chromosome contains only about 100,000 base pairs, a 50-fold difference, said Ferree.

"It points to a species-specific difference in heterochromatin between these two species," he added. "This could explain other instances when you have female hybrid lethality," Ferree said.

Source: Cornell University (news : web)

Explore further: Scientists sequence complete genome of E. coli strain responsible for food poisoning

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

X chromosome exposed

May 29, 2008

Researchers from the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) in Heidelberg, Germany, and the EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) in Hinxton, UK, have revealed new insights into how sex chromosomes are regulated. ...

How do you know whether you are male or female?

Dec 27, 2007

New research published online this week in the open-access journal PLoS Biology investigates this basic and much-studied question in the fruit fly, and comes to a surprising new conclusion.

Recommended for you

Going to extremes for enzymes

14 hours ago

In the age-old nature versus nurture debate, Douglas Clark, a faculty scientist with Berkeley Lab and the University of California (UC) Berkeley, is not taking sides. In the search for enzymes that can break ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Tesla444
1 / 5 (1) Oct 28, 2009
This doesn't offer clues as to how Species evolve. It proves that they don't interact. Species don't evolve into another Species and they never have and there is NO proof in any fossil record that show that they have. When are we just going to accept this fact and get on with real scientific research about who were are and where we came from. Both Evolutionism and Creationism are nonsense and its time we wake up the scientific community and do some real research based on facts not 125 year or 2,000 year old fantasies.
frajo
1 / 5 (2) Oct 28, 2009
Both Evolutionism and Creationism are nonsense

Why do you think creationism is nonsense? Isn't the BigBang proof enough?
Tesla444
1 / 5 (1) Oct 28, 2009
OK! Which does it prove? Creationism claims that the Big Bang (Theory) was 10,000 years ago-that is nonsense; Evolution has some equally dubious 'beliefs'. Perhaps if we were serious about figuring this out we could take our heads out of the sand & work together, actually using the 'facts' we have available to come up with a real answer. It may be that some elements of all views & some new ones thrown into the mix are actually where the truth lies. We can't deem something to be true just because we want it to be, there is too much of that going on.
Let's try starting from scratch, use the actual info we have & go from there. Everything is off the table to start--throw in the facts & all possible answers filtered thru modeling software until the picture becomes clearer. This would be a great Global Collaborative project, all on the Net.
If we can stage mass rallies at a time & place using the Net, surely we can apply similar methods to one of the most important questions of our time