Wi-Fi signals can see through walls

Oct 05, 2009 by Lin Edwards weblog
Image: arXiv:0909.5417.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at the University of Utah, USA, have discovered that variations in signal strengths in wireless networks can be used to "see" movements of people on the other side of walls or doors.

The scientists, Joey Wilson and Neal Patwari, detected movements by measuring the of the between the nodes of wireless network devices. The presence of people moving through the field is registered as a change in signal strength. The space is interrogated by many signals that are picked up by many receivers, and this allows a picture of the movement in the space to be built up. The technique is called variance-based radio tomographic imaging.

Wilson and Patwari set up a 34-node network outside a living room in a house to test the system, and were able to detect movements to about three feet through the wall. At present the scientists are only able to detect movements, and are not yet able to generate images, but they are sure this will be possible in the future. They are equally confident they will be able to improve accuracy, even with fewer nodes. They also say that adding GPS to each node would enable it to work out its own location, and this should improve the imaging process.

The researchers expect the system to find application in search and rescue operations, such as finding people trapped under collapsed buildings after earthquakes. The scientists envisage emergency workers using radio technologies to install a network of sensors around an emergency area to detect the presence of survivors and bodies.

According to Wilson and Patwari, the radio sensors could be deployed around a disaster site by the emergency workers, either by dropping them or throwing or launching them in some way. Each sensor would then form part of a network and begin to transmit information about signal strength measurements across the web of to a base station computer. The computer would correlate the information and determine the likely locations of survivors.

The advantage of this technique over existing systems capable of sensing what is on the other side of a wall is the price, since the nodes in the network are cheap and off-the shelf. The disadvantage of a cheap and simple system is its potential use as a spy tool by nosy neighbors, peeping toms or burglars, and all the privacy and safety issues such uses raise.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

More information: Through-Wall Tracking Using Variance-Based Radio Tomography Networks, Joey Wilson, Neal Patwari, arXiv:0909.5417

© 2009 PhysOrg.com

Explore further: Tiny UAVs and hummingbirds are put to test

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

UCR Studying Self-Organizing Smart Wireless Networks

Nov 30, 2006

For wireless multihop networks to be used by thousands, the network has to be able to self-organize, which is what University of California, Riverside researchers are developing at the Bourns College of Engineering.

Canary Wireless Hotspotter

Dec 06, 2004

Canary Wireless announces the availability of The Digital Hotspotter device, the first Wi-Fi detection and analysis tool with an LCD display that provides essential network information to Wi-Fi users and technology ...

Random Antenna Arrays Boost Emergency Communications

Feb 25, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- First responders could boost their radio communications quickly at a disaster site by setting out just four extra transmitters in a random arrangement to significantly increase the signal power at the receiver, ...

Tiny wireless Geiger counter detects radiation

Jun 06, 2006

A postage stamp-sized Geiger counter placed unobtrusively in stadiums, subways, malls and other large public spaces could detect radiation and determine whether it's a harmful source, like a dirty bomb.

Recommended for you

Comfortable climate indoors with porous glass

4 hours ago

Proper humidity and temperature play a key role in indoor climate. In the future, establishing a comfortable indoor environment may rely on porous glass incorporated into plaster, as this regulates moisture ...

Crash-testing rivets

4 hours ago

Rivets have to reliably hold the chassis of an automobile together – even if there is a crash. Previously, it was difficult to predict with great precision how much load they could tolerate. A more advanced ...

Customized surface inspection

5 hours ago

The quality control of component surfaces is a complex undertaking. Researchers have engineered a high-precision modular inspection system that can be adapted on a customer-specific basis and integrated into ...

Sensors that improve rail transport safety

5 hours ago

A new kind of human-machine communication is to make it possible to detect damage to rail vehicles before it's too late and service trains only when they need it – all thanks to a cloud-supported, wireless ...

Tiny UAVs and hummingbirds are put to test

21 hours ago

Hummingbirds in nature exhibit expert engineering skills, the only birds capable of sustained hovering. A team from the US, British Columbia, and the Netherlands have completed tests to learn more about the ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Andrux
not rated yet Oct 05, 2009
How does it make the difference between solid matter and a human ( a large rock or a human beneath a pile of rubble seems hard to distinguish) unless maybe the water content causes more interference with the signal but even then..., And how would we manage to place a node under the ground we are trying to scan for the signal to go through the volume that is being searched? if we have to dig to place the nodes, might as well dig to look for people...????
drel
5 / 5 (1) Oct 05, 2009
How does it make the difference between solid matter and a human?


"The presence of people moving through the field is registered as a change in signal strength." Movement is the key from what I read.