Idaho high court rejects Micron price-fixing claim

Jul 16, 2009 By REBECCA BOONE , Associated Press Writer

(AP) -- The Idaho Supreme Court has refused to revive a lawsuit brought by a shareholder who claimed Micron Technology's top officials were taking part in a price-fixing scheme.

In its unanimous ruling handed down Thursday, the high court agreed with 4th District Judge Darla Williamson and said the shareholder, Scott Orrock, failed to first demand to Micron's board members fix the problem, which is required for a derivative lawsuit.

Barry Kaplan, the attorney who represents the board of the Boise-based major producer of computer chips, could not be immediately reached for comment Thursday. Neither could Marc Umeda, the attorney who represented Orrock in the case.

A derivative lawsuit allows shareholders to sue executives or board members over claims that their actions harmed the company as a whole. Orrock's lawsuit alleged that Micron President, Chairman and CEO Steven Appleton and several members of the board participated in a price-fixing scheme starting in 2000. He also claimed that the board failed to correct the behavior or hold anyone responsible for years.

During oral arguments last month, Kaplan argued that Orrock failed to show the board did not act in good faith. Kaplan also said the board fully cooperated with a U.S. Justice Department investigation into price-fixing allegations.

The Justice Department was investigating whether chip companies conspired to manipulate the number of DRAM chips released to market to inflate prices. Micron was granted immunity by the department, and the investigation resulted in fines of more than $730 million and guilty pleas from four companies - Co., Elpida Memory Inc., Infineon Technologies AG and Inc.

Orrock's attorney, Marc Umeda, told the Supreme Court that Orrock should be exempt from the rule requiring that a demand first be made to the board because he knew such a demand would be futile. Orrock maintained that the board members knew or should have known that the price-fixing was occurring and that they chose not to investigate or try to stop it.

The high court sided with the board.

"Accepting all the facts alleged as true, Orrock insufficiently pled that demand on a majority of the Board at Micron would be futile," Justice Warren Jones wrote for the court. "There are insufficient facts which tend to show that a majority of other board members had knowledge of any DRAM price-fixing among DRAM manufacturers as reported in the news sources, that any of the board members consciously disregarded any of the 'red flags,' or that the board members failed to investigate or take remedial action."

Besides Appleton, six current and former board members were named in the lawsuit: James Bagley, Robert Lothrop, Gordon C. Smith, William P. Weber, Thomas T. Nicholson and Don J. Simplot. Wilber Stover Jr., Micron's former chief financial officer, and Michael Sadler, former vice president of worldwide sales, also were named as defendants.

Sadler is now the executive vice president of Inotera Memories Inc., a joint venture of Micron and Nanya Technology Corp. of Taiwan.

©2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Explore further: Huawei reports 2014 profit up 33 percent

Related Stories

Debate on ethics of tobacco funding

Jul 19, 2007

University of California officials said they will discuss in September whether it will accept additional research funding from the tobacco industry.

Is a friendly board a better board?

Aug 24, 2006

Research by UQ Business School's Professor Renée Adams suggests that increasing the independence of boards may not be so good for shareholders. Professor Adams and co-author Daniel Ferreira found that boards emphasising ...

Samsung admits chip price-fixing

Oct 14, 2005

Samsung has agreed to pay a huge fine after admitting in federal court that it was part of a conspiracy to fix the price of semiconductor chips.

Errors possible in evolution sticker case

Dec 15, 2005

Three U.S. appellate judges indicate a Georgia judge erred in ruling the placement of evolution disclaimer stickers in science books is unconstitutional.

Kansas OKs anti-evolution teaching rule

Nov 09, 2005

The Kansas Board of Education approved anti-evolution science teaching standards Tuesday, despite vocal criticism from educators, scientists and citizens.

Legal fears halt intelligent design move

Jan 23, 2006

A local school board member in Pennsylvania who is an intelligent design advocate says this is not the right time to introduce ID into classrooms.

Recommended for you

FTC's Google investigation probed by Senate antitrust chief

12 hours ago

The chairman of a U.S. Senate antitrust panel will look into the release of a confidential Federal Trade Commission report on an investigation of Google Inc.'s search business, which was closed in 2013 without an enforcement ...

Traffic court goes digital: Startup fosters settlements

12 hours ago

Traffic court is going digital. Michigan startup Court Innovations has developed a software solution that allows drivers to settle traffic violations by negotiating in a virtual environment instead of showing up to court ...

Amazon puts home staples on refill button

13 hours ago

Amazon moved Tuesday to become an errand service for home staples, introducing a "dash button" to allow consumers to instantly order popular products for home and kitchen.

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.