Promise and peril: a primer on gene editing

February 1, 2016

Britain's granting of a licence Monday for scientists to alter the genes of embryos for infertility research has thrown the controversial technique under a white-hot spotlight.

But what is it?

Gene editing is the direct, surgical modification at the molecular level of a genome, which is the for every individual animal or plant.

It is far more precise than conventional selective breeding or an earlier generation of .

Gene editing is already widely used to add desirable traits to food crops or livestock, and in lab animals for research on disease, and Chinese researchers announced last year they manipulated the genomes of non-viable human embryos looking for a way to correct a rare and fatal blood disorder.

Britain is the next country to allow scientists to alter human embryos—restricted to research on the causes of infertility and miscarriages.

The embryos to be used in the research are ones that would have been destroyed, donated by couples receiving In-Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) treatment who do not need them.

The new authorisation requires that these embryos be destroyed within 14 days.

Many scientists welcomed the decision to create a regulatory framework for the technique, but others expressed concern that may one day be used to make "designer babies" with selected physical or intellectual traits.

There are several forms of gene editing, all of them involving the removal or addition of gene snippets.

The human genome consists of long strings of DNA made up of about three billion "base pairs" of the chemical "letters" A, T, G and C (adenine, thymine, guanine and cytosine) in a particular order.

These comprise about 20,000 to 25,000 genes.

Tinkering with evolution

Gene editing makes it possible to remove or insert snippets of DNA at precise locations using molecular "scissors", like altering a film sequence or using the "find & replace" function in a word-processing software.

This allows researchers to "knock out" genes that cause disease (certain forms of cancer or Tay-Sachs, a very rare condition which destroys nerve cells, for example), or repair a naturally-occurring mutation.

The editing methods in use today are divided into two broad groups. In the first, the engineered changes persist only for the life of the organism, in the second it is passed on to the next generation.

The newest technique—known by it's acronym CRISPR/Cas9—has rapidly dominated the field because it is cheaper and much simpler to use. It is also the one best suited for editing the genome of still-developing embryos.

But such so-called "germline modification" means that DNA changes, if the embryo were allowed to live and become an adult, would be passed on to its offspring, effectively tinkering with the process of evolution.

CRISPRs—"clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats"—are an immune defence system found in bacteria to protect against viruses.

Relative to other methods, they can be easily engineered to home in on the exact spot where a break in the genome should be made.

Once a sequence of DNA is broken, scientists can trigger one of two kinds of repair mechanisms. One requires using a DNA fragment as a template—including the new sequence to be inserted—for the repair.

The other does not need a template, and simply patches the rupture in the genome.

Explore further: British bid to genetically modify human embryos

Related Stories

British bid to genetically modify human embryos

September 18, 2015

Britain's embryology regulator has received an application to genetically modify an embryo, which would be the first such attempt since a Chinese effort earlier this year.

Guidelines for human genome editing

January 21, 2016

Human genome editing for both research and therapy is progressing, raising ethical questions among scientists around the world.

Recommended for you

Smarter brains are blood-thirsty brains

August 30, 2016

A University of Adelaide-led project has overturned the theory that the evolution of human intelligence was simply related to the size of the brain—but rather linked more closely to the supply of blood to the brain.

Defend or grow? These plants do both

August 30, 2016

From natural ecosystems to farmers' fields, plants face a dilemma of energy use: outgrow and outcompete their neighbors for light, or defend themselves against insects and disease.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rderkis
not rated yet Feb 01, 2016
I am 68 years old and have learned that science and technology can be slowed down but never stopped.
This technology has the potential to create a utopia here on earth. Using it we can eliminate most diseases and make a leap in human intelligence. Plus by using it on food sources, both plant and animal we can virtually eliminate starvation.
The only caution I would advise is to not release on the world any changes that cant be easily and quickly reversed using the same technology.
For example using the drive genes, the mosquito species that carry diseases could be changed so after two generations it becomes sterile eliminating the species. If that changed gene were to jump into another species, which vary vary rarely happens, we don't eliminate another life form perhaps even humans. We need to be able to fix the problem quickly.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.