Computer as driver? 'Yes' from feds boosts self-driving cars (Update)

February 10, 2016 byTom Krisher And Justin Pritchard
Government will consider Google computer to be car's driver
This May 13, 2015, file photo, shows Google's new self-driving car during a demonstration at the Google campus in Mountain View, Calif. The federal government's highway safety agency agrees with Google: Computers that will control the cars of the future can be considered their driver. The redefinition of "driver" is an important break for Google. (AP Photo/Tony Avelar, File)

Computers that control cars of the future can be considered drivers just like humans, the federal government's highway safety agency has decided.

The redefinition of "driver" by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is an important break for Google, which is developing self-driving cars that get around without steering wheels, pedals—or even the need for a person to be inside.

Though treating a computer like a driver for regulatory purposes helps Google, its cars have miles to go before they get on the road in great numbers. While the safety agency agreed with Google's "driver" reinterpretation in a recent letter, it didn't allow other concessions and said numerous federal rules would have to be changed to permit the cars.

Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., is testing dozens of prototypes in California, Texas and Washington. The company has suggested they could be ready for the public in a few years.

In written requests over the past three months, Google asked the safety agency to interpret federal code in ways that would ease the path to market for its cars.

The agency agreed that the car can be a driver but, in a Feb. 4 response posted on its website, also rejected the company's claim that the cars comply with many related regulations including requirements for foot or hand brakes. Google said the requirement wasn't necessary because the electronic driver can stop the cars. The government said regulations are clear and would have to be changed to allow that.

"In a number of instances, it may be possible for Google to show that certain (federal) standards are unnecessary for a particular vehicle design," Paul Hemmersbaugh, the highway traffic safety agency's chief counsel, wrote. "To date, however, Google has not made such a showing."

To put their cars on the road, automakers must self-certify that they meet federal safety standards and get approval from the traffic safety agency. Hemmersbaugh's letter encouraged Google to apply for exemptions to the standards. It also said for some requests, the agency will have to go through the cumbersome federal rule-making process to approve the cars.

Adding a note of skepticism for Google's design, in which human control would be limited to a start and stop button, Hemmersbaugh wrote the company, might "wish to reconsider its view that a pedal may never be needed in any circumstance, and that there is not a risk of harm associated with a pedal's absence."

Google spokesman Johnny Luu said the company had no comment beyond that it was reviewing the agency's response.

After several years of caution, federal regulators said last month that they wanted to help speed the widespread adoption of self-driving cars if they prove to be safe.

In January at the Detroit auto show, Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said his department wants to get self-driving cars on the road quickly and will fast-track policies and possibly even waive regulations to do it.

Self-driving vehicles could eventually cut traffic deaths, decrease highway congestion and improve the environment, Foxx said. He encouraged automakers to come to the government with ideas about how to speed their development.

He also said the safety agency, which is part of his department, will oversee development of guidance for automakers on what's expected of self-driving car prototypes and what sort of tests should be used to make sure they are safe.

That policy could eventually lead to consistent national regulations for autonomous cars. Right now, individual states like California, Florida and Nevada have their own regulations.

Safety advocates worry the agency is getting too cozy with the auto industry when it comes to technology regulations.

On Wednesday, Foxx called the government's reinterpretation of driver "significant," but added in a written statement that "the burden remains on self-driving car manufacturers to prove that their vehicles meet rigorous federal safety standards."

The federal government isn't predicting when autonomous cars will be on public roads in big numbers, but some automakers have said they could be in use in limited areas by 2020—and Google has been more bullish than that.

Explore further: Gov't to add automatic braking to 5-star car safety rating

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Apple issues update after cyber weapon captured

August 26, 2016

Apple iPhone owners on Friday were urged to install a quickly released security update after a sophisticated attack on an Emirati dissident exposed vulnerabilities targeted by cyber arms dealers.

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

LagomorphZero
5 / 5 (1) Feb 10, 2016
What a historic day for robot rights!
henk_nijsingh
not rated yet Feb 10, 2016
I am afraid as well.

However there will be "robot drivers" and "human drivers" I suppose still and hybrid forms of it not to forget? This law doesn't equalize robots and humans?
henk_nijsingh
1 / 5 (1) Feb 10, 2016
I think robot cars must have different appearance than normal cars, so it can be seen from the outside. Otherwise we will enter an frightening, robotized, AI-dominated society I'm afraid. A customer must choose to buy a selfdriving car or a car he steers himself. Or he can use some kind of service instead of buying.

There's a risk that people will lose their sexuality with too much technology in daily life. That's already the case in Japan and South-Korea. People adapt to technology and begin to behave like technology.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (1) Feb 11, 2016
What a historic day for robot rights!

Right on the money - more than you think.
When one designates the autonomous vehicle as the driver then the liability for accidents caused will rest with the vehicle (manufacturer)....with the exception of accidents due to negligence in maintenance (e.g. user forgot to update the driver...erm...driver).
This has been an unresolved legal issue. (But if they have to reintroduce 'emergency pedals' then that may change again)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.