Researchers discover scientific surprise studying underwater methane seeps

January 6, 2015 by Elise Lima

Methane seeps—ever heard of them?

You might have this past summer. That's when the national news media featured stories about a recent discovery of hundreds of methane seeps—where methane gas bubbles up from the —in the North Atlantic Ocean. The discussion about this scientific find typically turned to important questions about the methane's impact on climate change, but there is another interesting question about methane seeps.

What are the creatures and ecosystems that exist there?

Researchers at Indiana State University have been studying methane seep ecosystems for a number of years, making trips underwater to investigate the unique association of organisms that live there. On their most recent trip to study seeps, Indiana State scientists made a big discovery regarding a tiny creature that lives in both seep and non-seep habitats.

In collaboration with Scripps Institute of Oceanography and California Institute of Technology, an Indiana State professor, graduate and undergraduate students embarked on a series of cruises to the near Oregon and Costa Rica in 2010. With little previously known about the biological communities living in and around the rocks common in these deep-sea environments, researchers pursued a variety of investigations to learn more about the organisms and ecosystems at different seep habitats and nearby non-seep environments.

One investigation, led by Indiana State professor Tony Rathburn and doctoral student Ashley Burkett, stumbled upon an overabundance of a microscopic organism—a species of "benthic foraminifera"—that could change how scientists understand past environments.

"We found over 1,000 individuals of this specific species," Burkett said. "The species is really interesting for us, and it's used to figure out what the climate was like in the geologic past."

Living on the sea floor, benthic foraminifera are microscopic creatures that produce an equally microscopic shell. The particular species of foraminifera that Rathburn and Burkett found was previously thought only to live in environments with high levels of dissolved oxygen. When scientists have found the shells of this creature in the fossil record, they have thought that the presence of the species indicated a well-oxygenated environment at a specific time in geologic history. With that idea in mind, scientists have developed a concept of what the ocean and climate was like in the past.

So, finding this species in abundance in both seep and non-seep environments where oxygen is limited was unexpected. Based on their research, Rathburn and Burkett speculate that it's not the abundance of oxygen that determines where these creatures are located. It may simply be that they're present where there are hard surfaces on the sea floor for them to live on.

"Scientists have used the presence of the species as an indicator of well-oxygenated environments," Burkett said. "But this may not be the case. It may have been that there was an absence of nice rocks to colonize in the soupy sediments of poorly oxygenated environments."

This important find was also just as unintended as it was unexpected. Rathburn and Burkett came upon these foraminifera while conducting a multifaceted seafloor experiment. Their original intent was to determine how long the tissue of foraminifera would remain on the sea floor after death. But to their delight, they got more than they asked for thanks to, of all things, plastic.

For their original experiment, they had placed test subjects inside a steel cage wrapped in plastic mesh, and this contraption was pushed half way into the sea floor sediment. Rathburn and Burkett chose the plastic mesh, because it was durable, easy to use and wouldn't deteriorate quickly. But it turns out that the mesh was a foraminifera magnet - after a year on the sea floor, the creatures had colonized on the plastic.

"We pulled the cages up (from the sea floor), and I started to disassemble them. We were looking at the tops of the cages and commented that there was all this goo on them .... One of us said, 'We should look at this.'"

And look she did. Using a microscope, Burkett examined the "goo" and discovered this unexpected creature. Many hours were spent painstakingly picking off all the foraminifera—about a thousand of them—from the cages, and examining the data.

Burkett presented her surprise findings this past October to the scientific community at a meeting of the Geologic Society of America in Vancouver, Canada. The response was positive.

"At this meeting, we shocked people with our results," Rathburn said. "(Our research) will shake up our ideas about how to use these creatures in the interpretation of the environments of the past."

Explore further: Researchers discover unknown species at juncture where hot and cold habitats collide

Related Stories

Probing the depths of the methane world

May 2, 2014

In 2011, Jennifer Glass joined a scientific cruise to study a methane seep off of Oregon's coast. In these cold, dark depths, microbes buried in the sediment feast on methane that seeps through the seafloor.

Recommended for you

Foreign farms increase the risk of conflicts in Africa

September 28, 2016

For the first time, researchers point to areas in Africa where foreign agricultural companies' choice of crops and management of fresh water are partly responsible for the increased water shortages and greater competition ...

Ancient global cooling gave rise to modern ecosystems

September 27, 2016

Around 7 million years ago, landscapes and ecosystems across the world began changing dramatically. Subtropical regions dried out and the Sahara Desert formed in Africa. Rain forests receded and were replaced by the vast ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Caliban
5 / 5 (1) Jan 06, 2015
A number of questions leap to mind:

1. How widespread was plastic mesh in the geologic past?

2. What percentage of foraminifera of this species identified in the fossil record were present due the supposed broader factor of the presence of " hard surfaces on the sea floor for them to live on. "

3. Can, or do, this particular foramenifera species in fact live in areas without such supposedly required "hard surfaces"?

4. Is it possible that perhaps these forams appeared in such numbers due the presence in this plastic mesh of some nutrient or other attractive volatile chemical signal?

It's difficult to ascertain what leads these scientists to such a sketchy, murky conclusion --at least based on the details supplied in this article-- and, one supposes, this was likely the best, most compelling line of reasoning they could develop based upon their findings.

Nevertheless, their conclusion seems unwarranted, even on that slender a basis.
tj10
1 / 5 (1) Jan 09, 2015
"was previously thought only to live in environments w/high levels of dissolved oxygen."

Also, it was previously THOUGHT "that the presence of the species indicated a well-oxygenated environment at a specific time in geologic history. WITH THAT IDEA IN MIND, scientists have developed a concept of what the ocean & climate was like in the past."

So what does this say about those models built on false beliefs/ideas?

This is good science, folks!! Now we finally have some real data to go on. The interpretation of it is always the tricky part, but we have data!

This just goes to show how difficult it is to reconstruct ancient history. Scientists must make many assumptions in these models. Even if those assumptions seem "plausible", who really knows? How trustworthy are they? Not very it seems.

Time will tell if the data be tweaked to save current models built on wrong assumptions. ACCURACY, not SAVING PET MODELS, should be the goal of science.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.