Water scarcity and climate change through 2095

Aug 18, 2014
Future water scarcity may pose a significant challenge to our ability to adapt to or mitigate climate change.

What will a global water scarcity map look like in 2095? Radically different, according to scientists at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, depending on the type and the stringency of the climate mitigation policies chosen to reduce carbon pollution.

In a first of its kind comprehensive analysis, the researchers, working at the Joint Global Change Research Institute, used a unique modeling capability that links economic, energy, land-use and systems to show the effects of global change on water scarcity. When they incorporated water use and availability in this powerful engine and ran scenarios of possible climate policy targets, they found that without any climate policy to curb carbon emissions, half the world will be living under extreme water scarcity. Some climate mitigation policies, such as increasing growth of water-hungry biofuels, may exacerbate water scarcity.

Water scarcity may pose a significant challenge to our ability to adapt to or mitigate . Why? For example, growing bioenergy crops to replace fossil fuel sources, an important component of many technology strategies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, rely on plentiful water. Thus, water availability could impose severe limits on both emissions mitigation and climate adaptation.

PNNL enhanced the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM) to assess the impact of changing water supplies and demands that stem from a simultaneously evolving human population, economic system, technology and climate.

"All high-resolution global integrated assessment models lack any representation of water systems," said Dr. Mohamad Hejazi, lead author and climate scientist at PNNL, working at the Joint Global Change Research Institute. "This implicitly assumes that emissions mitigation to climate change will be unaffected by water scarcity. Yet, we found that water is a significant component of our climate's future, even if societies deploy mitigation policies."

Schematic of the Global Change Assessment Model and systems, with water systems added.

The team constructed a new gridded water-balance global hydrologic model and added the component to the GCAM water system. Combined with high-resolution (spatially downscaled) representations of all the existing water demand sectors in GCAM, this produced a dynamic, high-resolution view of global, annual water scarcity. They modeled six major water demand sectors (irrigation, livestock, domestic, electricity generation, mining, and manufacturing) in GCAM at multiple regional scales and then spatially downscaled. Further, they simulated six policy scenarios (two types and three targets of radiative forcings) in GCAM to estimate the impacts on water scarcity. Simulating these scenarios in GCAM allowed the researchers to quantify, in an integrated framework, the effects of climate mitigation policies on global and regional water scarcity estimates, while accounting for uncertainty arising from using different general circulation models and following different types and constraining levels of climate policies on water scarcity.

When compared to a baseline scenario where no is implemented, water scarcity declines under a universal carbon tax mitigation policy, but it increases with a fossil fuel and industrial emissions carbon tax mitigation scenario by the year 2095, mainly due to variations in prevailing bioenergy productions. The analyses show the baseline scenario results in more than half of the world's population living under extreme by the end of the 21st century. By one measure (grid scale) in 2050, 36 percent of the global population will have greater water demands than available in a year; and by 2095, that number increases to 44 percent. They also performed the calculations at watershed scale to complement the grid scale results.

Explore further: Why growing crops for food rather than energy in the Midwest can help mitigate climate change

More information: Hejazi M, J Edmonds, L Clarke, P Kyle, E Davies, V Chaturvedi, M Wise, P Patel, J Eom, and K Calvin. 2014. "Integrated Assessment of Global Water Scarcity over the 21st Century: Global Water Supply and Demand under Extreme Radiative Forcing." Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 18:2859-2883. DOI: 10.5194/hess-18-2859-2014.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Does it help conservation to put a price on nature?

43 minutes ago

Putting a price on the services which a particular ecosystem provides may encourage the adoption of greener policies, but it may come at the price of biodiversity conservation. Writing today in the journal ...

Reef-builders with a sense of harmony

2 hours ago

Cold-water corals of the species Lophelia pertusa are able to fuse skeletons of genetically distinct individuals. On dives with JAGO, a research submersible stationed at GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, scientists ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mememine69
1.4 / 5 (11) Aug 18, 2014
If science "can't" say their own 32 year old "possible"; "Threat To The Planet" is as certain as they "believe" smoking WILL cause cancer then climate action will never happen. Deny that!
supamark23
4.5 / 5 (8) Aug 18, 2014
If science "can't" say their own 32 year old "possible"; "Threat To The Planet" is as certain as they "believe" smoking WILL cause cancer then climate action will never happen. Deny that!


Uh, did you just have a stroke or something? That made absolutely no sense.
antigoracle
1.7 / 5 (11) Aug 18, 2014
Why are all the AGW Cult's climate models such worthless waste of millions of dollars?
Because they are all based on the same al.gor.e.dumb.
TegiriNenashi
1 / 5 (6) Aug 18, 2014
The solution to water scarcity is simple: build desalination plants. According to
http://en.wikiped...lination
if electricity cost is dropped ten times, then water by desalination becomes competitive with traditional methods of tapping to natural fresh water sources. Where to get the money for desalination plans, and how to drop electricity costs?

Cease funding all worthless "climate change" studies like this. Stop all these impotent "renewable energy" initiatives -- wind and solar would never be cheap or abundant. Build more nuclear powered stations. Or hope that fusion would become a reality one day, rendering all our today's energy worries to the footnotes of history.
john_mathon
1 / 5 (2) Oct 04, 2014
In the 1980s the "Club of Rome" a group of MIT scientists and professors produced an elaborate model of the world economy and climate and showed that by 2000 most of the world would be starving, dead and polluted unless chinese level communism was imposed on us immediately.

In fact the opposite happened. Not only did we not have these massive problems but China converted to OUR economy. You can build a computer model to show anything you want. Anyone who believes this is stupid without proof this model actually works in any way at all.

What does common sense say? The last time temperatures rose was called the climactic optimum 5000 years ago. During that time water was prevalent all over and allowed human beings to emerge from hunter gatherers and become farmers and create civilization. I am not saying this is proved to happen again. I'm saying that data is needed to justify the claims made in this study otherwise its not worth the cycles it took to generate it.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.