Why growing crops for food rather than energy in the Midwest can help mitigate climate change

February 18, 2014
Land use change (in hectares) for 14 U.S. Midwest states under a climate mitigation policy in a global integrated model. In their study, PNNL scientists determined that many agricultural management technologies can contribute to climate mitigation.

To examine agricultural and land use practices and their climate mitigation potential in a 14-state portion of the U.S. Midwest, PNNL scientists at the Joint Global Change Research Institute nested a high-resolution agricultural model, EPIC (Environmental Policy Integrated Climate), within PNNL's flagship integrated assessment model, GCAM (Global Change Assessment Model). Then, they used the combined system to analyze three alternative futures: one with no policy about climate change and two with different levels of climate mitigation policies. The results show that the ability of different regions to contribute to global climate change mitigation depends, in part, on the distinct biophysical characteristics of the land in each region. Nesting EPIC in GCAM also helped to show how different land use practices—for example, growing bioenergy crops or using alternative crop management practices—might contribute to climate change mitigation in a specific and globally important agricultural production region: the U.S. Midwest. Even in the future scenario with vigorous climate change mitigation policies, GCAM projects that the U.S. Midwest will remain an essential food crop production region, with limited adoption of bioenergy crops.

One of the biggest questions about policies is how various regions will be affected by different global policy actions, such as how a price on carbon would influence biofuel production and greenhouse gas emissions. In this study, the simulations show that intensification of food and feed crop production is the most effective contribution to climate mitigation for land in the U.S. Midwest. Other regions of the world, where food and feed may be less inherently profitable, are better suited to afforestation for carbon storage or production of bioenergy crops, from a climate mitigation perspective. By understanding these tradeoffs, policy makers can make more informed and sustainable agricultural and land use decisions. Furthermore, this work illustrates the viability and value of nesting models with higher spatial and technology resolution inside larger-scale models to examine regional responses to global climate mitigation policies and economic conditions.

To examine the possible future land use changes in the U.S. Midwest region resulting from global climate mitigation policies, the researchers acquired high-resolution data, involving land cover and agricultural production, crop management, and detailed soil profiles, to calibrate GCAM. The EPIC model also was used to simulate diverse crops and crop management practices to provide potential food and bioenergy crop yields for the GCAM calibration. Many crops and crop management practices were simulated, including major crops grown in rotation, no-tillage, and residue removal for bioenergy practices. Three climate scenarios were run: no policy, a mid-level climate forcing scenario, and an intensive mitigation policy designed to stabilize atmospheric radiative forcing at or below current values. To execute the approximately six million individual EPIC model runs across the 14-state region and multiple scenarios, the researchers used a parallel computing framework processed via a supercomputing cluster (Evergreen).

This work is one of several efforts to add spatial and temporal detail to GCAM and link it with detailed models of natural and human systems, which is a key goal of PNNL's Platform for Regional Integrated Modeling and Analysis (PRIMA) Initiative. The GCAM scenario results from this study can be downscaled for further use in many different vegetation, land surface, and climate models, as well as to re-run the EPIC model for future years to further analyze environmental impacts of a GCAM-projected land use change for the U.S. Midwest. In addition, EPIC can be run using future climate change projections to simulate the impacts of temperature and precipitation on crop yield and carbon storage. Thus, the system applied here also could be used to examine the interactions of climate impacts on crop production and economic drivers for mitigation from land use changes.

Explore further: Research shows how natural disturbances affect climate change response strategies

More information: Thomson AM, GP Kyle, X Zhang, V Bandaru, TO West, MA Wise, RC Izaurralde, and KV Calvin. In press. "The contribution of future agricultural trends in the US Midwest to global climate change mitigation." Global Environmental Change. Available online, Dec. 19, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.019.

Related Stories

New research links crop disease and climate change

February 28, 2012

Researchers from the University of Hertfordshire have investigated links between crop disease and climate change which impact our food growth and production - affecting our food security today and for future generations. ...

Policy briefing analyzes US climate change

February 4, 2014

A Texas A&M AgriLife Research scientist and Texas A&M University doctoral graduate have co-authored a policy briefing on climate change, one of seven publications focusing on energy in the U.S.

Recommended for you

East Antarctic Ice Sheet has history of instability

December 13, 2017

The East Antarctic Ice Sheet locks away enough water to raise sea level an estimated 53 meters (174 feet), more than any other ice sheet on the planet. It's also thought to be among the most stable, not gaining or losing ...

Hydraulic fracturing negatively impacts infant health

December 13, 2017

From North Dakota to Ohio to Pennsylvania, hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking, has transformed small towns into energy powerhouses. While some see the new energy boom as benefiting the local economy and decreasing ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.3 / 5 (3) Feb 18, 2014
The BS is endless!
The Shootist
3 / 5 (2) Feb 18, 2014
I don't give an tinker's damn about 'climate change' but I am in complete support of a ban on the use of arable land to grow crops for alcohol, to be used for fuel in transportation.

At least until everyone on the planet are as fat as they wanna be.
1 / 5 (2) Feb 21, 2014
From what I can tell, the only reason to produce (energy purposed) ethanol is to appease simple-minded enviro-heros.

Re ethanol: there is ZERO cost justification, it spawns big-time corporate welfare, and (I suspect) the carbon footprint per BTU is astronomical.

When it comes to emotionally-charged, intelligence-lacking environmentalists, economics and common sense is totally irrelevant.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.