California has given away rights to far more water than it has

Aug 20, 2014
On average, California allocates more than five times the amount of water to users than is available in its rivers and streams. Credit: Josh Viers/UC Merced photo

California has allocated five times more surface water than the state actually has, making it hard for regulators to tell whose supplies should be cut during a drought, University of California researchers reported.

The scientists said California's -rights regulator, the State Water Resources Control Board, needs a systematic overhaul of policies and procedures to bridge the gaping disparity, but lacks the legislative authority and funding to do so.

Ted Grantham, who explored the state's water-rights database as a postdoctoral researcher with the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences, said the time is ripe for tightening the water-use accounting.

"Given the public's current attention on drought and California water, we now have an unprecedented opportunity for strengthening the water-rights system," said Grantham, who conducted the analysis with UC Merced Professor Joshua Viers.

Better information might enable state regulators to better target water cutbacks in times of drought, Grantham said.

Grantham and Viers verified that water-rights allocations exceed the state's actual surface water supply by about 300 million acre-feet, enough to fill Lake Tahoe about 2.5 times.

The state has allocated a total maximum allowable use of 370 million acre-feet of surface water—more than five times the 70 million acre-feet available in a year of good precipitation, according to the researchers' review of active water rights on record. The analysis was published today (Aug. 19) in the journal Environmental Research Letters.

The scientists said the California's water-rights allocation system is complicated and backlogged, which contributes to the mismatched accounting. For example, people sometimes take water, apply retroactively for the right to use the water and continue taking it—sometimes for up to a decade—while their applications are pending.

Inaccurate reporting by water-rights holders worsens the problem. Some may even deliberately overestimate so they do not lose as much if cutbacks occur. The result is that in most water basins and in most years, far more people hold water rights than there is water. In the San Joaquin River basin, for example, water-rights allocations exceed the river's average annual flow by eightfold.

"All those allocations mean that in times of drought, it's hard to tell who should have to reduce water use, causing delays in issuing curtailments," said Viers, director of the Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society at UC Merced.

During the current drought, the state water board has for some watersheds ordered curtailments for all water users, to protect fish.

Viers and Grantham, now with the U.S. Geological Survey, are working to iron out issues with its database and make the information available to policymakers.

Explore further: 'Shocking' underground water loss in US drought

More information: The complete study is available online: watershed.ucdavis.edu/files/bi… ts_UCDavis_study.pdf

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

'Shocking' underground water loss in US drought

Jul 24, 2014

A major drought across the western United States has sapped underground water resources, posing a greater threat to the water supply than previously understood, scientists said Thursday.

Recommended for you

EU leaders seek last-minute climate deal

4 hours ago

European Union leaders came under pressure Thursday to strike a deal aimed at bolstering Brussels as a trailblazer in fighting global climate change as negotiations went down to the wire.

Research team studies 'regime shifts' in ecosystems

7 hours ago

The prehistory of major ecological shifts spanning multiple millennia can be read in the fine print of microscopic algae, according to a new study led by researchers at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TegiriNenashi
1 / 5 (3) Aug 20, 2014
Mankind has proven history of embarking onto much more challenging goals (than solving water availability). Therefore, the media would do a great service to general public if it stopped waterboarding it with drought related articles. That problem is solvable -- there is plenty of water north of the golden state; just make an effort to pass it along. The "high speed train" initiative can wait; water deficit less so.
TegiriNenashi
1.3 / 5 (3) Aug 20, 2014
To give fuller impression how brain damaged some eco activists are, here is proposal to destroy the source of the purest fresh water in the state of California:
http://en.wikiped...toration
(to be fair even democratically leaning state officials call this initiative insane).
Nik_2213
not rated yet Aug 20, 2014
How much of that water drains back into watercourses and is 'recycled' ??

FWIW, this sounds like a classic 'Tragedy of the Commons'. IIRC, to prevent such, you get rid of the lawyers on all sides after a brief presentation and revert to 'Common Law'...

All they need now is a modest quake to breach the delta levées and contaminate a major water source with saline...
alfie_null
not rated yet Aug 21, 2014
The "high speed train" initiative can wait; water deficit less so.

To the contrary, the drought, as bad as it feels now, is ephemeral. Five years from now, few will remember it. I can't speak for your high speed train initiative, but I suspect that unlike the drought, there will always be a lot of people who need to travel, commute.