Satellite X-ray observations reveal neutron star with donut-shaped magnetic field and axial wobble

Jul 04, 2014
An artist's impression of a magnetar with an intense torroidal magnetic field in its core. Credit: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss

When a massive star dies, it can collapse under its own gravity with such force that it produces a supernova, leaving behind an extremely dense remnant consisting almost entirely of neutrons—a neutron star. Some neutron stars, known as magnetars, possess powerful magnetic fields, which are stronger than any other known magnetism in the Universe. These intense magnetic fields somehow produce high-energy x-ray pulses, but this process is not well understood.

Kazuo Makishima from RIKEN's MAXI Team and Teruaki Enoto from the RIKEN Nishina Center for Accelerator-Based Science in collaboration with the University of Tokyo and NASA have now found evidence that the magnetar 4U 0142+61 'wobbles' about its rotational axis, implying that the sphericity of the star is distorted due to an intense donut-shaped magnetic field at its core.

"Magnetars emit high-energy 'hard' x-rays, but the origins of these emissions are unknown," explains Makishima. "We observed 4U 0142+61 using the Suzaku x-ray astronomy satellite to find out whether the magnetar's emissions change over time."

The magnetar had previously been measured to spin at a rate of one revolution in about 8 seconds and to produce x-ray pulses of the same period, but Makishima and his co-workers noticed slow fluctuations in the arrival times of the x-ray pulses. They attributed these fluctuations to axial wobble, known as free precession. The star's axis precesses with a period that differs very slightly from the star's rotation period, and the slow beat between the two periods changes the observed emissions.

"The idea of free precession was not in my mind when we started the data analysis," says Makishima, "but I was familiar with it through my long experience with spinning satellites. The precession is most likely caused by a slight deformation of the magnetar, and the deformation is possibly due in turn to internal magnetic fields that are even stronger than the external visible fields."

The findings suggest that the is deformed from a perfect sphere due to an extremely strong, tightly wound toroidal buried deep in the star's core. The results therefore support the hypothesis that the hard-x-ray pulses are produced by consuming . Makishima's team plans to analyze a third dataset from 4U 0142+61 and search the Suzaku data for other magnetars that might show similar effects. "We will also propose observations of these objects with ASTRO-H, the powerful successor to Suzaku, which will be launched in 2015," he says.

Explore further: Researchers find possible evidence of toroidal magnetic field surrounding magnetar

More information: Makishima, K., Enoto, T., Hiraga, J. S., Nakano, T., Nakazawa, K., Sakurai, S., Sasano, M. & Murakami, H. Possible evidence for free precession of a strongly magnetized neutron star in the magnetar 4U 0142+61. Physical Review Letters 112, 171102 (2014). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.171102

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

A magnetic monster's dual personality

Jul 16, 2012

(Phys.org) -- Is it a magnetar or is it a pulsar? A second member of a rare breed of dead, spinning star has been identified thanks to an armada of space-based X-ray telescopes, including ESA’s XMM-Newton. ...

A hidden population of exotic neutron stars

May 23, 2013

(Phys.org) —Magnetars – the dense remains of dead stars that erupt sporadically with bursts of high-energy radiation - are some of the most extreme objects known in the Universe. A major campaign using ...

Recommended for you

Lives and deaths of sibling stars

10 hours ago

This beautiful star cluster, NGC 3293, is found 8000 light-years from Earth in the constellation of Carina (The Keel). This cluster was first spotted by the French astronomer Nicolas-Louis de Lacaille in ...

Fermi finds a 'transformer' pulsar

Jul 22, 2014

(Phys.org) —In late June 2013, an exceptional binary containing a rapidly spinning neutron star underwent a dramatic change in behavior never before observed. The pulsar's radio beacon vanished, while at ...

User comments : 22

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Dr_toad
5 / 5 (6) Jul 04, 2014
I'm curious why this particular stub was voted down. I found it very interesting, even if it's paywalled.
Steve 200mph Cruiz
5 / 5 (3) Jul 04, 2014
Would this also translate into a distortion of the stars gravitational field?
These objects are a great example of overlap of gravity and electromagnetism and much more easy to observe than black holes.
cantdrive85
1.4 / 5 (11) Jul 05, 2014
I'm curious why this particular stub was voted down. I found it very interesting, even if it's paywalled.

Probably because the physics of neutron stars and magnetars are based upon pseudoscience.
Steve 200mph Cruiz
4.6 / 5 (10) Jul 07, 2014
Cantdrive

You don't understand what pseudoscience is, and frankly even that field is more distinguished than you.
Yeah our models of neutron stars are imperfect, but that just means that there is more to learn.
But the real point is that you can not appreciate the fact that we can even remotely understand what is happening in a region of space hundreds of light years away, and completely out of context of our everyday experience and just the simplicity of math can teach us about it. Top minds are working on it and that is the beautiful thing that you fail to appreciate.
no fate
1 / 5 (6) Jul 07, 2014
Yeah our models of neutron stars are imperfect, but that just means that there is more to learn... we can even remotely understand what is happening in a region of space hundreds of light years away, and completely out of context of our everyday experience and just the simplicity of math can teach us about it. Top minds are working on it and that is the beautiful thing that you fail to appreciate.


How can the mainstream expect anyone but it's brotherhood and mindless lemmings to believe that they can know what is going on with a body 20KM in diameter several hundred light years away, and yet be totally awestruck at close ups of our own sun because it isn't behaving how the model says?

"These intense magnetic fields somehow produce high-energy x-ray pulses, but this process is not well understood."

Somehow...

"The results therefore support the hypothesis that the hard-x-ray pulses are produced by consuming magnetic energy."

Stupidest thing I have ever heard.
Steve 200mph Cruiz
5 / 5 (4) Jul 07, 2014
No fate

Maxwell's equations unifying magnetism and electricity:
Www.youtube.com/?...70HXrbG0

Einstein's field equations describing how energy and mass distort space t ime:
Www.youtube.com/?...PKAKZWx8

I'm sure you are a wiz at differential equations and tensor fields
yep
2 / 5 (4) Jul 08, 2014
Steve your links are shite.
Plasma as a distinct form of matter does not have to follow Maxwell's laws as this abstract shows.http://scitation....1.352924
Not to say these parameters are undefinable, but just not as clear cut as ordinary matter can be.http://deepblue.l...quence=2
As far as a distortion of time goes, here is a little blog to chew on.
http://debunkingr...ity.com/
"..it is reasonable to hope that in a not too distant future we shall be competent to understand so simple a thing as a star." Eddington
Almost a hundred years since he wrote that and we still do not have a clue because we still cling to his model and prefer the magical fantasy that is theoretical astrophysics.
Look up in the sky! Is it a supernova...its a pulsar...no its a Neutron star. Faster than a speeding dentist drill more mass then multiple suns able to gravitationally collapse into a black hole!
no fate
1 / 5 (2) Jul 08, 2014
No fate

Maxwell's equations unifying magnetism and electricity:
http://Www.youtub...70HXrbG0

I'm sure you are a wiz at differential equations and tensor fields


Steve, your math doesn't describe reality and your physics are antiquated as they are based on gravity. Magnetism and electricity are not unified in nature in every instance and "spacetime" is not curved. Also, gravity does not bend light and matter cannot infinitely compress.

100 years of pier reviewed fantasy can't change physical reality. Neither can math. Those are very complex equations, if I had wasted my time learning that math I would be as ignorant as someone who thinks a BH is a point of infinite gravity and that most of the matter in the universe is not currently detectable with our instruments.

People intelligent enough to learn these equations and apply them should have enough common sense to realize when they go someplace reality cant.
cont...
Technico
2 / 5 (4) Jul 08, 2014
Satellite X-ray observations reveal neutron star with donut-shaped magnetic field and axial wobble
This is an important observation which illustrates a nearly seamless transition between dense neutron stars and black holes, which are routinely observed to behave in similar way. It points indirectly to the actual nature of black holes, which should behave like extremely dense, but still merely classical stars, i.e. not a pin-point singularities as the schematic GR models predict.
no fate
1 / 5 (2) Jul 08, 2014
The fact is science has no way of proving gravity is responsible for universal structure and motion and in inventing instruments to try to confirm that it is, the model has needed constant alterations in order to keep step with observations. The instruments are showing us that it isn't gravity ( as does common sense considering the "ingredients" we know are present in space which form the structures) but you guys would rather try to add variables to the existing fiasco than revisit the theory as a whole. It is now at the point where the more complicated the math is the more fantastic the claim of what is possible in reality becomes and it is a slap in the face to anyone with enough experience to know better. I am not a whiz at tensor fields, but something as simple as the process of compressing hydrogen tells me that it doesn't happen due to gravity. On the heels of this I am expected to believe the above crap about what we know of this star, yet our sun is still a mystery?
no fate
1 / 5 (2) Jul 08, 2014
Satellite X-ray observations reveal neutron star with donut-shaped magnetic field and axial wobble
This is an important observation which illustrates a nearly seamless transition between dense neutron stars and black holes, which are routinely observed to behave in similar way. It points indirectly to the actual nature of black holes, which should behave like extremely dense, but still merely classical stars, i.e. not a pin-point singularities as the schematic GR models predict.


The life of an unbound neutron is 14 minutes (repeatedly observed).....what supposedly is a neutron star made of again? Only math can go there.....
Uncle Ira
3.3 / 5 (3) Jul 08, 2014
The life of an unbound neutron is 14 minutes (repeatedly observed)....


Is that too long? Or not long enough? For your magnet theory I mean. How many times are we supposed to repeat the observing of it? After 14 minutes he dead so what's to see after that?

.what supposedly is a neutron star made of again?


Well no-Skippy my guess would be mostly neutrons. Is that wrong? Maybe you think it is magnets and stuffs like that?

Only math can go there.....


Okayeei. I got the 14 minutes part, now what comes next to finish up the ciphering to get there?
Dr_toad
4.2 / 5 (5) Jul 08, 2014
The clue is "unbound" neutron. In a neutron star they aren't free, just like in a normal atomic nucleus.

@yep: "As far as a distortion of time goes, here is a little blog to chew on.
http://debunkingr...ity.com/"

What utter bullshit.
Steve 200mph Cruiz
4.3 / 5 (6) Jul 08, 2014
No fate,

Th einstein field equations have not been changed, the only thing that has changed is that we get better data, they've gotten MORE accurate with better measurements. It even contains the cosmological constant (the energy causing the exponential expansion of the universe). Relativity describes the universes structure, whether you "believe" it does or not doesn't matter, cause there are smarter people out there who "know" it does.
Maxwells equations are freaking LAWS, the circuit exists because we understand how magnetism and electric fields interact, if you don't "believe" in Maxwells equations, you should have some self respect and get off your computer.
Steve 200mph Cruiz
4.3 / 5 (6) Jul 08, 2014
"if I had wasted my time learning that math I would be as ignorant as someone who thinks a BH is a point of infinite gravity and that most of the matter in the universe is not currently detectable with our instruments."

There in lies your problem. Learning something new NEVER makes you more ignorant, in fact that is the opposite definition of the word. I'm and Atheist, but I still read about Taoism, Coptic Christianity, Islam, ect. Not because I believe in it, but to integrate ideas and build my philosophy on life, and it is essential to understanding the world.

If it was truly wrong and you actually understood the equations, you would have a leg to stand on with your criticism. But you don't, you just some dude with an invested interest in fundamentals of science being wrong so nothing will convince you. It's a medieval line of reasoning, close minded, archaic, and wrong. If you truly had an open mind, you would not fear learning something new, and evidence would be your persuasion.
Hat1208
3 / 5 (2) Jul 08, 2014
@Steve 200mpg Cruz

Don't feed the trolls after midnight, don't get the trolls wet.
no fate
1 / 5 (2) Jul 08, 2014
I'm not saying any equations are wrong, I am saying that they are useless because gravity isn't responsible for the motion they attempt to describe.
I do not fear learning anything (I just don't set parameters inside which to accomplish it and thus learn truth, not fiction). Learning useless information does indeed make you ignorant, until you learn that it is wrong. Equations based around gravity as a descriptor of reality are a waste of time, not the ones describing motion. The circuit is the simplest manifestation of magnetism and electricity. If this is all you know then senior kindergarten is your next stop regarding the school of magnetism. DM was not represented in any of Einsteins original field equations so you're full of shit there. Evidence is my only persuasion which is why I post what I do. I interpret it based on what it actually is, not what i want it to be.

cantdrive85
1 / 5 (2) Jul 09, 2014
'Flaws in relativity'...

http://vixra.org/abs/1308.0073
yep
2.3 / 5 (3) Jul 09, 2014
"What utter bullshit."
Yes your beliefs are, but you are willing to ignore a long history of observations falsifying accepted theory. Pulsars spinning faster than theoretically believed, spinning slower than theoretically believed, pulsars with to much mass, in the wrong orbit, with the wrong binary. How's that whole gravitational wave generator working for those neutron stars? Seems like Zwicky, Baade, and Einstein's GR kinda struck out, but keep the faith Mkay.
"The clue is unbound neutron"
Ya right, a supernova explosion results in an implosion squeezing stellar protons and electrons together to form neutrons popping some quarks in the process and spinning at 24000 rpm as it becomes the magical neutron-degenerate matter. Pretty impressive for a mass energy of 0.000001 GeV. Funny we just can't seem to get them to bind to themselves and remain stable here on earth.
"Maxwells equations are freaking LAWS"
Maybe you missed the part about plasma being Non-Maxwellian. Means does not apply.
Whydening Gyre
not rated yet Jul 09, 2014
"The results therefore support the hypothesis that the hard-x-ray pulses are produced by consuming magnetic energy."

Or they COULD be produced by matter interaction within the overlap boundaries of interacting mag fields.Sort of like hot and cold weather fronts...

This may be completely off the mark, but makes sense to me.
Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (1) Jul 09, 2014
My take being - magnetic energy is always there and being "Utilized", not "consumed".
yep
not rated yet Jul 11, 2014
Or maybe they are looking at it with the wrong assumptions. Maybe a fresh look at the basics.
http://www.who.in...sEMF/en/
Then a less exotic solution.
http://www.jspf.o...-562.pdf
Sure would go a long way to explain the pulsing with out physics defying oscillations.