Rich-poor gap and the risk of civil war

Jun 04, 2014 by Eberhard Karls

Researchers from the University of Tübingen have found that the greater the disparity in wealth, the greater the risk of civil war. "If unequal division passes a certain level, the effects within a region are enormous," say Economic History specialists Professor Jörg Baten and Christina Mumme. Extremes of wealth inequality could explain the frequency of civil wars in Latin America and Africa in the past 200 years – and could be contributing to the current situation in eastern Europe. "The gap between rich and poor there has widened significantly in recent years. National and ethnic identities are often dug up to distract attention from discontent over income difference," Baten says.

The economic historians observe a steadily increasing rich-poor gap in many regions around the globe. In collaboration with Utrecht University in the Netherlands, they compiled a far-reaching study using the first data on the global development of over the past two centuries. The study showed that incomes in Europe and North America had come closer into line in the 1970s ‒ but that since then, the gap between rich and poor has grown, particularly in eastern Europe and the United States.

"The current debate over rising inequality demonstrates just how central this phenomenon is for the perception of economic development and the survival of the forms of the market economy," says Baten. The researchers examined inequality both within regions and between regions, using the Gini coefficient. Zero represents the theoretically possible situation in which everyone has exactly the same , and 1 represents complete inequality. Many countries have an inequality factor of between 0.30 and 0.60 auf.

This study shows definitively that the three regions of western Europe, eastern Europe and North America have had a very slow decrease in inequality, and that incomes have moved closer together over a very long period of time. However, in the past 20 years, that trend has reversed, both in North America and in eastern Europe. "In western Europa, the rebound is in a small order of magnitude," says Baten. The Gini coefficient of in western Europe fell from values of 0.43 and 0.52 in the 19th century to 0.36 in 1980; then it rose by 2000 to 0.37.

Africa by contrast has experienced a long-term rise in unequal incomes, which was strongest from the 1960s to the 1980s. Since then, inequality has dropped back a little. In Latin America the gap between rich and poor has remained constantly great, while in Asia it has been consistently small – regardless of the actual size of the incomes. The Mideast has had two periods in which wealth was distributed particularly unequally – one prior to 1870 and the other in the 1960s and 70s. Here, too, there was a slightly greater concurrence of incomes in the 1980s.

If we assume that greater wealth inequality makes more likely, then the trend in the US is set to become more controversial. "If this development continues for a long time, it could provide fertile ground for conflict," says Baten. He adds, however, that the outbreak of a civil war depends on a number of factors.

Explore further: Income inequality now greater in China than in US

More information: Jörg Baten and Christina Mumme, "Does Inequality Lead to Civil Wars? A Global Long-Term Study Using Anthropometric Indicators (1816-1999)" in: European Review of Political Economy 32 (December 2013), pp. 56-79.

Jan Luiten van Zanden, Jörg Baten, Péter Földvari, and Bas van Leeuwen, "The Changing Shape of Global Inequality 1820-2000. Exploring a New Dataset" in: Review of Income and Wealth 60-2 (June 2014), pp. 279-297.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The deep roots of economic inequality

May 23, 2014

A special issue of Science explores the origins of human inequality, drawing on research by SFI Professor Sam Bowles and collaborators.

Recommended for you

Why are UK teenagers skipping school?

11 hours ago

Analysis of the results of a large-scale survey reveals the extent of truancy in English secondary schools and sheds light on the mental health of the country's teens.

Fewer lectures, more group work

12 hours ago

Professor Cees van der Vleuten from Maastricht University is a Visiting Professor at Wits University who believes that learning should be student centred.

How to teach all students to think critically

12 hours ago

All first year students at the University of Technology Sydney could soon be required to take a compulsory maths course in an attempt to give them some numerical thinking skills. ...

Consumer loyalty driven by aesthetics over functionality

Dec 17, 2014

When designing a new car, manufacturers might try to attract consumers with more horsepower, increased fuel efficiency or a lower price point. But new research from San Francisco State University shows consumers' loyalty ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

julianpenrod
1 / 5 (4) Jun 04, 2014
More peddling of malarkey.
As with so many lies, the ideas of this article are rife solely with visions of visceral concepts of fairness, equality. And fundamental facts remain unspoken. Such as that wars cost money!
And where are economically disadvantaged people going to get that money?
The fact is, all wars have been fought by big money interests and rich people. They made out big on military contracts, then swooped in to grab lands lost or devastated by the war as well as rebuilding, then they put themselves into power over the ruined lands.
Of course, the acceptance of lies like this informs the New World Order how many dullards there are, and those who fall for it and get shot only serves to sew fear to keep them in line.
About the only instance where a civil war can be begun "on the cheap" is an agrarian society, where the people can supply for themselves and know their neighbors closely. Which is why the NWO wants everyone in cities.
supamark23
5 / 5 (3) Jun 04, 2014
buncha BS.


Uh, you might want to familiarize yourself with history. Start with the French Revolution and move on to the 1917 Bolshevik revolution... that was poor people slaughtering the rich.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.