Income inequality now greater in China than in US

April 29, 2014, University of Michigan

( —Income inequality has been rising rapidly in China and now surpasses that of the U.S. by a large margin, say University of Michigan researchers.

That is the key finding of their study based on newly available survey data collected by several Chinese universities.

"Income inequality in today's China is among the highest in the world, especially in comparison to countries with comparable or higher standards of living," said University of Michigan sociologist Yu Xie.

Xie, a researcher with the U-M Institute for Social Research, is co-author with U-M graduate student Xiang Zhou of an article published online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The researchers based their main analyses on data from the China Family Panel Studies, a large-scale survey project conducted by Peking University's Institute of Social Science Survey. The project represents about 95 percent of the Chinese population in 25 provinces in mainland China, and was started in 2010 in collaboration with U-M's ISR (a formal partnership between the two institutes was established in 2005, with an emphasis on quantitative social science methods).

Xie and Zhou also used data from six other surveys conducted by Chinese university-affiliated survey organizations using internationally accepted scientific sampling methods.

"Unfortunately, for a variety of practical and political reasons, government statistics have not been a reliable source of information on in today's China," Xie said.

The U-M researchers calculated an internationally accepted measure of income inequality, the Gini coefficient, and compared it to earlier estimates for China and to coefficients for other nations around the world.

They found that the Gini coefficient for family income in China is now around 0.55 compared to 0.45 in the U.S. In 1980, China's Gini coefficient was 0.30. In 2012, the Chinese government refused to release the country's Gini coefficient. Generally, when the coefficient reaches 0.5, it indicates that the gap between rich and poor is severe.

"Ordinary persons in China know about this increase, as they have personally experienced it in their own lives," Xie said. "Although ordinary Chinese people seem to tolerate the high inequality, they also recognize it as a social problem that needs to be addressed.

"In fact, out of a number of social issues given, respondents in a 2012 national survey rated the most severe, above corruption and unemployment."

According to Xie and Zhou, the rise of income inequality in China has coincided with the country's rapid economic development since 1978. They identify the large regional variation in economic activity and the large income gap between rural and urban residents as the main forces responsible for widening the gap.

"The rapid rise in income inequality in China can be partly attributed to long-standing government development policies that effectively favor urban residents over rural residents and favor coastal, more developed regions over inland, less developed regions," Zhou said.

As a result, they say, changes in government policies that would reduce rural-urban and regional disparities could have a major impact on reducing income inequality.

Explore further: Income inequality leads to more US deaths, study finds

More information: "Income inequality in today's China," by Yu Xie and Xiang Zhou. PNAS, 2014.

Related Stories

Child abuse rises with income inequality, study shows

February 11, 2014

As the Great Recession deepened and income inequality became more pronounced, county-by-county rates of child maltreatment – from sexual, physical and emotional abuse to traumatic brain injuries and death – worsened, ...

Recommended for you

Study: Social media sways exercise motivation

January 17, 2019

It's January – a time when students are looking for that extra bit of oomph. For some, time spent on social media might provide the necessary inspiration to get up and exercising – but that time can come with consequences, ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.8 / 5 (10) Apr 29, 2014
"Income inequality", "climate change", "alternative energy", etc. Interesting how's buzzwords, language, ideas, etc. so closely match those of the political left. I guess conformity is a must there.
1 / 5 (9) Apr 29, 2014
Sort of like among teenagers.
5 / 5 (7) Apr 29, 2014
Sort of like "common usage".
5 / 5 (6) Apr 29, 2014
political left (...) conformity

A comment thick with irony.

First, China's self-projection as a righteous Communist system: The ultimate in political left. Cue extreme income inequality and the naked Emperor.

Second, your own view of the world as a black and white, right-left, good-evil, truth-lies template: The ultimate in binary conformity.
not rated yet Apr 29, 2014
What, I wonder, are the numbers when comparing Russia to the US, or Russia to China....,
5 / 5 (6) Apr 30, 2014
You can look at the Gini index values here:

Though most of the numbers seem a bit out of date.
3 / 5 (2) May 03, 2014
Sure the inequality is raising in China. There are rich people NOW...
3 / 5 (6) May 03, 2014
The notion of "income inequality" is a non-issue that will be politicized by the left in the USA for the next election cycle.

It is the type of 'liberal cause' that is easy to indoctrinate imbeciles or young voters without life experience. Yet the type of government that had the legal force to solve income inequality, is not one anyone would want to live with.

Income inequality is a non-problem in a free society but is a problem in a communist state.
3 / 5 (2) May 04, 2014
From Dr. Guy Foreman at Vanderbilt on thermodynamics (and economics)
"First Law: You can't get something for nothing.
Second Law: You can only get out of a system what you put into it; nothing more!
Third Law: Since there are losses in the system (e.g., friction et al.), if you want something out of a system, you're going to have to put more than that into the system to overcome the losses and still provide the "output" you expect.

Bottom line: "There is no free lunch!" -- Dr. Foreman then said that this doesn't just apply to thermodynamics, it applies to LIFE!!! If you don't earn it, you won't have it."
2.5 / 5 (2) May 04, 2014
Sure the inequality is raising in China. There are rich people NOW...

After WWI, Germans had wheel barrows full of cash.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.