Why marine fish don't go into the deeper blue

Mar 05, 2014 by Nancy Owano report
Why marine fish don't go into the deeper blue
Notoliparis kermadecensis. Credit: Natural Environment Research Council

(Phys.org) —Fish appear to be absent from the ocean's greatest depths, the trenches from 8,400 to 11,000 m. A team told Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences about this in a study titled "Marine fish may be biochemically constrained from inhabiting the deepest ocean depths."

Their study explains why you will not see inhabiting the deepest ocean depths. The are unlikely to survive in oceans deeper than about 8200 meters and the reason has to do with physiology. "We propose that the answer is the need for high levels of trimethylamine oxide (TMAO), common in many marine animals," said the study authors. TMAO is a powerful stabilizer in fish that counteracts the destabilization of proteins by pressure. The researchers observed that the deeper they went, the appeared to have increasing amounts of TMAO. That impacts depth limits. "We know that if TMAO is too high, it makes proteins so stable they can't work," Paul Yancey a biology professor at Whitman College, Washington State and one of the study authors, told BBC News. Yancey said the myosin protein in muscle needs to flex for muscles to move, and too much TMAO would stop this happening.

The team sought their answers to depth limits in fish by looking at hadal snailfish, recovered from the bottom of the Kermedec Trench north of New Zealand. "This is by far the deepest fish we've caught and analyzed, and they have the highest levels of this TMAO molecule," Yancey said in the BBC report.

"By capturing the world's second-deepest known fish," the team wrote in their study," the hadal snailfish Notoliparis kermadecensis from 7,000 m, we find that they have the highest recorded TMAO contents, which, moreover, yield an extrapolated maximum for fish at about 8,200 m. This is previously unidentified evidence that biochemistry may constrain depth for a large taxonomic group."

Study authors are Paul Yancey, Mackenzie Gerringer, Jeffrey Drazen, Ashley Rowden, and Alan Jamieson. Author affiliations are Whitman College, Walla Walla, Washington, University of Hawaii, the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, New Zealand; and University of Aberdeen, UK.

Explore further: Rarely seen animals studied in New Hebrides Trench

More information: PNAS DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1322003111

Abstract
No fish have been found in the deepest 25% of the ocean (8,400–11,000 m). This apparent absence has been attributed to hydrostatic pressure, although direct evidence is wanting because of the lack of deepest-living species to study. The common osmolyte trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) stabilizes proteins against pressure and increases with depth, going from 40 to 261 mmol/kg in teleost fishes from 0 to 4,850 m. TMAO accumulation with depth results in increasing internal osmolality (typically 350 mOsmol/kg in shallow species compared with seawater's 1,100 mOsmol/kg). Preliminary extrapolation of osmolalities of predicted isosmotic state at 8,000–8,500 m may indicate a possible physiological limit, as greater depths would require reversal of osmotic gradients and, thus, osmoregulatory systems. We tested this prediction by capturing five of the second-deepest known fish, the hadal snailfish (Notoliparis kermadecensis; Liparidae), from 7,000 m in the Kermadec Trench. We found their muscles to have a TMAO content of 386 ± 18 mmol/kg and osmolality of 991 ± 22 mOsmol/kg. These data fit previous extrapolations and, combined with new osmolalities from bathyal and abyssal fishes, predict isosmotic state at 8,200 m. This is previously unidentified evidence that biochemistry could constrain the depth of a large, complex taxonomic group.

via BBC: www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-26423203

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Ocean acidification leaving fish in the dark

Jan 30, 2014

Increasing carbon dioxide in the world's oceans could hamper fishes' eyesight, slowing their reaction times and leaving them vulnerable to predators or unable to hunt, new research has shown.

Recommended for you

Study indicates large raptors in Africa used for bushmeat

10 hours ago

Bushmeat, the use of native animal species for food or commercial food sale, has been heavily documented to be a significant factor in the decline of many species of primates and other mammals. However, a new study indicates ...

Noise pollution impacts fish species differently

12 hours ago

Acoustic disturbance has different effects on different species of fish, according to a new study from the Universities of Bristol and Exeter which tested fish anti-predator behaviour.

Invertebrate numbers nearly halve as human population doubles

12 hours ago

Invertebrate numbers have decreased by 45% on average over a 35 year period in which the human population doubled, reports a study on the impact of humans on declining animal numbers. This decline matters because of the enormous ...

Insecticides similar to nicotine widespread in Midwest

13 hours ago

Insecticides similar to nicotine, known as neonicotinoids, were found commonly in streams throughout the Midwest, according to a new USGS study. This is the first broad-scale investigation of neonicotinoid ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

verkle
5 / 5 (3) Mar 05, 2014
It's truly astounding that fish can go up to 8,200m deep in the first place. That's about 250 Bar.

Doug_Huffman
1.4 / 5 (7) Mar 05, 2014
Humans appear absent from the great deserts and likely a biochemical correlation could be found.
DistortedSignature
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 05, 2014
@Doug: Biochemical? Are you talking about our body's ability to disperse heat would be the main reason why we don't live in deserts? Surely the accessibility of food and water are bigger culprits.

Why not say, "Humans appear absent from most of planets in our solar system and likey a biochemical correlation could be found." Or even "Humans appear absent from altitudes above x and likely a biochemical correlation could be found".

I am confused on if you're saying that this finding is obvious (already proven, etc.) or you are against actually understanding why things are the way they are. In this case, why fish don't live in the deepest depths of the ocean, and what determines this limit.
Lex Talonis
not rated yet Apr 11, 2014
No the real reason why fish don't go "down there" is that there are scarey things in the dark basement.....