Mystery of bottle gourd migration to Americas solved

Feb 11, 2014 by Bob Yirka report
Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl. Credit: Wikipedia.

(Phys.org) —A team with members from several institutions in the U.S. has finally set to rest the mystery of how the bottle gourd found its way to the Americas. In their paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the team explains that new DNA analysis has revealed that the bottle gourd made its way to South America by floating over from Africa.

For several decades, scientists have been wrangling with the mystery of how the bottle gourd, which is believed to be native to Africa and Asia, made its way to the Americas where it grew wild approximately 10,000 years prior to being domesticated. Some believed the mystery had been solved when a research team using DNA techniques reported back in 2005 that the bottle gourd in the Americas had Asian DNA, suggesting the gourd made its way to North America by early people carrying it across the land bridge that existed between what is now Alaska and Russia. In this new effort, the research team contradicts that earlier finding claiming that newer DNA analysis tools show that gourds in the Americas actually have African DNA, which suggests they made it to the New World by floating across the ocean.

To settle the matter once and for all, the researchers analyzed 86,000 base pairs taken from samples, rather than the meager three markers used in the 2005 study. It proved, the team says, that the bottle gourd found its way to the Americas from Africa on its own, grew wild for a time and was then cultivated. To further bolster their claim, the team created a computer simulation of bottle gourds and the waters through which they would have had to travel. The simulation showed it was possible the gourds could have traveled to the ocean via African rivers or streams, then made their way across the ocean via currents to the coast of South America, all in just nine months—a short enough span to allow for the seeds contained within to grow once reaching land.

The new research appears to settle the matter of how the bottle gourd got to the New World, but questions still remain, such as how it got to Asia, and why are there so few wild variants of the bottle gourd anywhere in the world today?

Explore further: Bottle released by US scientist in 1956 found

More information: "Transoceanic drift and the domestication of African bottle gourds in the Americas," by Logan Kistler et al. PNAS, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1318678111

Abstract
Bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) was one of the first domesticated plants, and the only one with a global distribution during pre-Columbian times. Although native to Africa, bottle gourd was in use by humans in east Asia, possibly as early as 11,000 y ago (BP) and in the Americas by 10,000 BP. Despite its utilitarian importance to diverse human populations, it remains unresolved how the bottle gourd came to be so widely distributed, and in particular how and when it arrived in the New World. A previous study using ancient DNA concluded that Paleoindians transported already domesticated gourds to the Americas from Asia when colonizing the New World [Erickson et al. (2005) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(51):18315–18320]. However, this scenario requires the propagation of tropical-adapted bottle gourds across the Arctic. Here, we isolate 86,000 base pairs of plastid DNA from a geographically broad sample of archaeological and living bottle gourds. In contrast to the earlier results, we find that all pre-Columbian bottle gourds are most closely related to African gourds, not Asian gourds. Ocean-current drift modeling shows that wild African gourds could have simply floated across the Atlantic during the Late Pleistocene. Once they arrived in the New World, naturalized gourd populations likely became established in the Neotropics via dispersal by megafaunal mammals. These wild populations were domesticated in several distinct New World locales, most likely near established centers of food crop domestication.

Related Stories

Bottle released by US scientist in 1956 found

Feb 07, 2014

It was April 1956, and the No. 1 song was Elvis Presley's "Heartbreak Hotel." At the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on Cape Cod, scientist Dean Bumpus was busy releasing glass bottles into the Atlantic Ocean as part ...

Research reveals the origins of chooks

Aug 06, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- The question of whether the egg or the chicken came first may not have been solved, but University of Queensland research is helping find how the humble chook moved around the world.

Recommended for you

Dogs can be pessimists too

7 hours ago

Dogs generally seem to be cheerful, happy-go-lucky characters, so you might expect that most would have an optimistic outlook on life.

Transparent larvae hide opaque eyes behind reflections

21 hours ago

Becoming invisible is probably the ultimate form of camouflage: you don't just blend in, the background shows through you. And this strategy is not as uncommon as you might think. Kathryn Feller, from the University of Maryland ...

Peacock's train is not such a drag

22 hours ago

The magnificent plumage of the peacock may not be quite the sacrifice to love that it appears to be, University of Leeds researchers have discovered.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TopCat22
3 / 5 (3) Feb 11, 2014
a more interesting question would be ... How did the plant evolve to be a bottle in the first place? What possible evolutionary value was there to the plant to be a receptacle? Could it be that hominids have been instrumental in its evolution as a tool for a million years?
shavera
1 / 5 (1) Feb 11, 2014
Hollow things float?

The fact that some other species can use its hollow nature could be a side effect. That being said, being useful to humans has helped plant species in the past (really interesting documentary on the subject: "Botany of Desire")
Caliban
1 / 5 (1) Feb 11, 2014
There should have been some effort made to explain what constitutes wild vs domesticated. Does the mere act of planting a seed from a wild gourd qualify it as cultivated, or are there any genetic changes involved?

These findings, as presented, seem to be highly doubtful in terms of providing the basis for a definite conclusion.

They also ignore -as a matter of course-- the other obvious possibility, which is that they were transported to the new world by seafaring prehistoric Africans, which is just as likely as some lone gourd being carried across the Atlantic and finding some highly improbable fertile ground on the seacoast of South America.

If they want to say it was mere chance, then they will need to locate the epicenter where this gourd made landfall and from whence its modern range subsequently radiated, and at the same time detail what distinguishes wild from cultivated.