(Phys.org) —A team of researchers with representatives from the U.S., Germany and France has found evidence of western Eurasian genes in Khoisan tribes living in southern Africa. This suggests, the researchers conclude in a paper they've had published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, that a migration from the Middle East back to Africa occurred approximately 3000 years ago.
Scientists believe humans evolved from ancestral primates in Africa several hundred thousand years ago, but it wasn't until approximately 65,000 years ago that they made their way out of Africa and into the Middle East and eventually the rest of the world. Until recently, that migration has been viewed by most scientists as a one-way trip. Gene studies over the past several years has turned that thinking around, however, as its been found that many people in several parts of Africa have European or Asian gene segments in their DNA. In this latest study, the researchers have found evidence of Eurasian genes in tribespeople who were thought to have a purely African ancestry.
The Khoisan tribespeople of today still live much as their ancestors did—they are hunter-gathers who are also pastoralists—they are most familiar to westerners as the people who speak with distinctive clicking noises. Until now, they were believed to have the purest African gene pool due to their thousands of years of isolationist practices.
The team acquired DNA samples from 32 people living in Khoisan tribes in southern Africa—an analysis revealed Eurasian gene segments in all of them. But that wasn't the end of the story. To understand how the gene fragments got into the Khoisan tribespeople, the researchers turned to archeological and linguistic evidence to build a possible time-line of events. In so doing, they've found what they believe to have been a migration back into Africa by people of the Middle East (ancestors of the people that migrated to Europe and Asia) approximately 3000 years ago. Those people made their way to various parts of the continent, including a part of eastern Africa from which the Khoisan tribespeople had migrated south approximately 900 and 1800 years ago.
The researchers found something else—the Khoisan tribespeople also had snippets of Neanderthal DNA in their genes as well—courtesy of their Eurasian heritage.
Explore further:
Genetic admixture in southern Africa: Ancient Khoisan lineages survive in contemporary Bantu groups
More information: Ancient west Eurasian ancestry in southern and eastern Africa, Joseph K. Pickrell, PNAS, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1313787111
Abstract
The history of southern Africa involved interactions between indigenous hunter–gatherers and a range of populations that moved into the region. Here we use genome-wide genetic data to show that there are at least two admixture events in the history of Khoisan populations (southern African hunter–gatherers and pastoralists who speak non-Bantu languages with click consonants). One involved populations related to Niger–Congo-speaking African populations, and the other introduced ancestry most closely related to west Eurasian (European or Middle Eastern) populations. We date this latter admixture event to ∼900–1,800 y ago and show that it had the largest demographic impact in Khoisan populations that speak Khoe–Kwadi languages. A similar signal of west Eurasian ancestry is present throughout eastern Africa. In particular, we also find evidence for two admixture events in the history of Kenyan, Tanzanian, and Ethiopian populations, the earlier of which involved populations related to west Eurasians and which we date to ∼2,700–3,300 y ago. We reconstruct the allele frequencies of the putative west Eurasian population in eastern Africa and show that this population is a good proxy for the west Eurasian ancestry in southern Africa. The most parsimonious explanation for these findings is that west Eurasian ancestry entered southern Africa indirectly through eastern Africa.

akka69
1.7 / 5 (6) Feb 04, 2014Frank0001
1.8 / 5 (10) Feb 04, 2014Jeffhans1
4.9 / 5 (11) Feb 04, 2014Humans in coastal fishing boats have survived journeys of thousands of miles and could have bred with local people where they ended up. If those descendants have beneficial traits either through learned behavior or genetic benefits, they will be more likely to have surviving offspring and pass those genes on. I would imagine people living in the middle east would have a number of different tech developments that would greatly enhance the tribes' overall ability to survive.
Frank0001
1 / 5 (6) Feb 04, 2014Agreed but what does that have to do with the folly of this article?
scottfos
4.2 / 5 (5) Feb 04, 2014I've been thinking about this recently. Was there any good reason why folks thought this? Or was it just a common assumption?
And I agree, Frank - this would have been (more) interesting to me if it were 30,000 years ago, not 3,000....
Osiris1
3.8 / 5 (4) Feb 04, 2014JVK
1.4 / 5 (11) Feb 04, 2014That's only the most parsimonious explanation if you believe in the ridiculous theory of mutation-initiated natural selection. If you believe the experimental evidence, it shows why ecological adaptations make it appear that Neandertal DNA is so widespread that theorists must keep changing their misrepresentations of migrations to make the experimental evidence fit their ridiculous theories.
Social pseudoscientists may believe that nonsense, but serious scientists have examined the experimental evidence and simply laugh at the nonsense evolutionary theorists keep touting.
Genetic incompatibilities are widespread within species
http://www.nature...678.html
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
4.4 / 5 (7) Feb 05, 2014Bummer #1: that may mean the previously seen signal of african introgression from human ancient populations is not indicative of a 4th population besides the eurasian Neanderthal, Denisovan and H. erectus admixture.
Bunner #2: the anti-evolutionist pheromone troll strikes a science web site again.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
3.7 / 5 (3) Feb 05, 2014These africans never exited Africa (read here); of those who did, they are _us_ (read here; but also elsewhere); and your anecdotal but possible phenotype characteristics aren't tied to genome results (read elsewhere; and don't make stuff up).
@scottfos: It was based on anthropology (no evidence of back-migration) but also genomes (most variation in africans indicate undiluted root).
@Osiris: "redarken"? Your model is overfitted. And "Essarhaden" seems to be religious myth (from the Dead Sea scrolls), not historical data. [ http://www.ao.net...-trn.htm ]
And how fast do you think skin tones change anyway? Last week it was announced that the original hunter-gatherers of Europe were dark skinned up to 8 ky ago.
tekram
4.8 / 5 (5) Feb 05, 2014"the Ethiopian Y chromosomes that fall into Groups VI, VIII, and IX may be explained by back migrations from Asia. The first observation confirms the ancestral affinity between the Ethiopians and the Khoisan, which has previously been suggested by both archaeological and genetic findings."
Surly
5 / 5 (5) Feb 05, 2014Can't find what you haven't looked for, and small amounts of admixture are hard to detect.
Yes, the Khoisan have the earliest divergence date and are absolutely the oldest group of people living. *But*, we're now finding out that they occasionally interbred with people who returned from Europe to Africa.
The fact that some people returned from Europe to Africa isn't a surprise; we knew that from finding R1b in Africa.
@Osiris1: How are you defining "Nubian"? There were pretty big Khoisan populations in Ethiopia in historic times, which later migrated south - that's probably how these genes got to southern Africa.
Ens
5 / 5 (3) Feb 06, 2014tadchem
not rated yet Feb 07, 2014Jeffro1969
3 / 5 (2) Feb 07, 2014baudrunner
2.3 / 5 (3) Feb 08, 2014The Shootist
2.7 / 5 (3) Feb 09, 2014I dunno, but, His Imperial Majesty Haile Selassie I, Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah, King of Kings of Ethiopia, Elect of God, was Caucasian, or so he said. And who are we to gainsay His Majesty?
Agreed, I should have reparations for slavery and colonialism in compensation for the Roman deprivations in Britannia and Caledonia.
baudrunner
not rated yet Feb 09, 2014selfsimilarity1_61803399
not rated yet Feb 09, 2014jennifer_shaw_5249
not rated yet Feb 13, 2014It seems that people in south west Asia spread into northern Africa bringing the Afro-Asiatic languages with them. Some spread to Ethiopia and some of these moved south along the eastern branch of the Rift Valley to central Tanzania. They were in contact with the indigenous Khoisan-speaking hunter-gatherers, some of whom adopted herding from them.
These Khoisan-speaking herders were the ancestors of both the Sandawe people and the Khoi-khoi people who eventually made their way from eastern Africa to southern Africa.