Why bigger accelerators are better in particle physics

Feb 27, 2014 by Nitesh Soni
CERN’s vision for a FCC (grey dotted line) and the LHC (blue line). Credit: CERN

While the world's largest circular particle accelerator – the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) – will continue operation for the next few years, scientists have already started the conversation to build a much bigger, post-LHC circular accelerator.

A five-year feasibility study of the Future Circular Collider (FCC) was launched in a meeting of scientists earlier this month near Geneva, under the leadership of the European particle physics laboratory CERN, which hosts the LHC.

The proposed accelerator would be housed underground in an 80-100km tunnel – roughly four times longer than the existing LHC's 27km tunnel.

But what's the point of building a bigger version of what we already have? And with confirmation of the discovery of the Higgs boson last year, what's left to explore?

Designing the FCC

The modern powerful and high-energy experimental facilities are highly complex and technologically challenging to build, so require comprehensive studies before coming up with a final design.

Proposals for the current LHC began in the early 1980s but the machine wasn't actually completed and switched on until 2009. So while the LHC will continue to run experiments until around 2030 (or slightly beyond), now is the perfect time to start talking about its successor.

The FCC design study will have input from scientists across the globe from national laboratories, institutes and universities.

There are a few contenders to host the gigantic machine. The obvious front-runner is the CERN who is banking on the success of the LHC and their existing research and development accelerator infrastructures – but there is strong interest from Japan and China too.

If the machine is built in Geneva then the brand new tunnel will straddle the Switzerland-France border, go under Lake Geneva and kiss the Alps in the east and the Jura mountains in the west.

Deciding what to throw in the collider pot

The FCC would require to operate nearly an order of magnitude higher energy than the LHC, but this could be achieved with the assembly of different types of superconducting steering magnets to accelerate particles through the tunnel.

The total length of a collider's arc is measured by the number of the magnets and their strength. In a realistic scenario, if the FCC's magnetic system were to provide a magnetic field of 16 Tesla (maximum 20 Tesla) – around twice the value of the LHC magnetic field – then we'd require the accelerator complex to have a circumference of 100km.

This assembly would accelerate the particles very close to the speed of light.

When the LHC switches on again next year we might get a peek at the secrets behind supersymmetry, dark matter or other exotic phenomena (all collectively known as the New Physics).

Those results would build a strong physics case for the FCC. There is tons of theoretical physics work that can only be confirmed or ruled out experimentally at higher energies (in other words, with faster acceleration and higher speeds).

There is open debate on the types of particles to smash together in the FCC:

  1. proton-proton (hadron collider) – needing roughly an order of magnitude higher energy than the LHC
  2. electron-positron (lepton collider) as a potential intermediate step towards realisation of the hadron facility. For this option, combining with the International Linear Collider – a proposed electron-positron 31km long linear collider – would also be considered
  3. electron-proton.

The LHC currently hosts seven experiments but it is probably too early to say how many experiments the FCC would host. In addition, there is no official funding number for this project yet. We might have to wait a little while for those figures, but the five-year study will provide cost and energy optimisation.

Colliders help us to understand the nature deeper and at a very minute level – and, with talks beginning now, they have the added benefit of galvanising industries to develop and provide cutting edge technologies.

If the post-LHC circular collider becomes a reality then it will easily snatch the title of The Lord of the Particle Ring from the LHC.

Explore further: CERN eyes new giant particle collider

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

CERN eyes new giant particle collider

Feb 06, 2014

Europe's physics lab CERN said Thursday it was eyeing plans for a circular particle collider that would be seven times more powerful than the facility which discovered the famous "God particle." ...

CERN prepares its long-term future

Feb 06, 2014

Particle physics takes the long-term view. Originally conceived in the 1980s, the LHC took another 25 years to come into being. This accelerator, which is unlike any other, is just at the start of a programme ...

Physics group looks ahead past LHC to LEP3

Aug 08, 2012

(Phys.org) -- A group of physicists is looking beyond the usefulness of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) to a new collider that would sit in the tunnel still occupied by the LHC, to an updated version of what ...

Test magnet reaches 13.5 tesla – a new CERN record

Nov 18, 2013

The Short Model Coil (SMC) programme tests new magnet technologies with magnets about 30 centimetres long. The technology developed in the SMC will eventually help engineers build more powerful magnets for ...

Long shutdown to consolidate LHC magnet interconnections

Feb 11, 2014

Since April last year, the Superconducting Magnets And Circuits Consolidation (SMACC) team has been strengthening the electrical connections of the superconducting circuits on the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). ...

Recommended for you

IHEP in China has ambitions for Higgs factory

15 hours ago

Who will lay claim to having the world's largest particle smasher?. Could China become the collider capital of the world? Questions tease answers, following a news story in Nature on Tuesday. Proposals for ...

The physics of lead guitar playing

17 hours ago

String bends, tapping, vibrato and whammy bars are all techniques that add to the distinctiveness of a lead guitarist's sound, whether it's Clapton, Hendrix, or BB King.

The birth of topological spintronics

18 hours ago

The discovery of a new material combination that could lead to a more efficient approach to computer memory and logic will be described in the journal Nature on July 24, 2014. The research, led by Penn S ...

The electric slide dance of DNA knots

21 hours ago

DNA has the nasty habit of getting tangled and forming knots. Scientists study these knots to understand their function and learn how to disentangle them (e.g. useful for gene sequencing techniques). Cristian ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Bonia
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (2) Mar 01, 2014
more distant the collider energy scale is from common life energy scales

@Z
we are not trying to mimic the energy levels in cellular reproduction, colliders are trying to mimic the power/energy levels of the early universe as close as possible giving insight to fundamental science so that our standard model can be as accurate as possible giving us the ability to create a strong, applicable, functional base for future physics

EVERYTHING, including your precious LENR/Cold Fusion and even your Aether is underpinned by fundamental science
colliders either prove or disprove a great deal by providing evidence for or against known models

now about your black holes cite:
1- energy level issues
2- stability issues
3- all of our accelerators are under 1000 light years in diameter
4- IF they were a given consequence of colliders at levels today, THEN we would have died already long ago given that we have much higher collisions in our upper atmosphere from cosmic rays
Bonia
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (1) Mar 01, 2014
Or rather should be

@Z
you think they are not?
Justification for that?
such a black holes are routinely formed in collider experiments - they're just a common atom nuclei

nonsensical conjecture
justification?
What makes you think that LHC routinely creates black holes?
Bonia
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Bonia
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Bonia
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Bonia
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Bonia
Mar 01, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
gwrede
not rated yet Mar 02, 2014
From the aritcle: "This assembly would accelerate the particles very close to the speed of light."

Sigh. About as informative and newsworthy as stating that "the surface of the sun is very hot".