Computerizing people may be next step in tech

Dec 24, 2013 by Steve Johnson

It's likely the world in the not-so-distant future will be increasingly populated by computerized people like Amal Graafstra.

The 37-year-old doesn't need a key or password to get into his car, home or computer. He's programmed them to unlock at the mere wave of his hands, which are implanted with tags. The rice-size gadgets work so well, the Seattle resident says, he's sold similar ones to more than 500 customers through his company Dangerous Things.

The move in the Bay Area and beyond to outfit people with that can be swallowed, implanted in their bodies or attached to their skin via "smart tattoos" could revolutionize and change the way people interact with devices and one another. Critics call the trend intrusive, even sacrilegious. But others say it ultimately will make life better for everybody. Some researchers and executives envision a day when devices placed in people will enable them to control computers, and many other things solely with their thoughts.

"In the next 10 to 20 years we will see rapid development in bioengineered and man-machine interfaces," predicted Graafstra, who wrote a book about the technology, adding that the trend is going to "push the boundaries of what it means to be human."

Companies and researchers are keenly interested in the topic.

In a patent application made public in November, Google's Motorola Mobility branch proposed an "electronic skin tattoo" for the throat - with a built-in microphone, battery and wireless transceiver - that would let someone operate other devices via voice commands.

When asked, Google said it often seeks patents on employee brainstorms and that, while "some of those ideas later mature into real products or services, some don't." But Google CEO Larry Page apparently is intrigued with enhancing people electronically. A 2011 book about the Mountain View search giant quoted him saying, "eventually you'll have an implant, where if you think about a fact, it will just tell you the answer."

Similar notions are under study by others, including UC Berkeley researchers. In a scholarly paper published in July, they proposed implanting people's brains with thousands of tiny sensors they called "neural dust."

The idea initially is to have the little circuits gather detailed data on brain functions. But eventually, lead researcher Dongjin Seo said, the electronic swarms may prove useful for "controlling devices via thought" or stimulating malfunctioning brain regions to restore "limb motor control for paralyzed patients."

Among the most widely anticipated uses for implants, smart pills and electronic tattoos are medical.

In October, Stanford doctors implanted the brain of a Parkinson's disease sufferer with a new device that gathers detailed data on the "neural signatures" of his illness. They hope to use the information to make a gadget that will ease Parkinson's symptoms with electrical impulses that adjust to any activity the patients do.

Last year, Proteus Digital Health of Redwood City, Calif., won approval to sell a pill that relays information about a person's vital signs via a mobile phone to their doctor. And officials at Santa Clara, Calif.,-based Intel envision their microchips one day in devices ingested or implanted for medical and other uses.

Some fear implants might become mandatory for or jobs.

After learning about a Cincinnati video surveillance firm that required employees to have a chip inserted in them, California Sen. Joe Simitian introduced a bill that became law in 2008 forbidding anyone in this state from making similar demands.

Two years later, when the Virginia House of Delegates passed a similar measure, some of the lawmakers - citing biblical references about the Antichrist - denounced implanted chips as "the mark of the beast."

It's unclear how widespread those concerns are. A study Intel made public this month found that 70 percent of the 12,000 adults it surveyed were receptive to having their health data collected by various means, including "swallowed monitors."

Nonetheless, Intel futurist Brian David Johnson thinks the public initially will be more amenable to smart tattoos than computerized pills or gadgets inserted into them, because "something on your skin, that's a baby step" compared to a swallowed or surgically implanted device.

One tattoo being developed by MC10 of Cambridge, Mass., would temporarily attach to the skin like an adhesive bandage and wirelessly transmit the wearer's vital signs to a phone or other device. The company, which has a contract for a military version, plans to introduce one next year for consumers, according to MC10 official Barry Ives Jr. who touted its use for "athletes, expectant and new moms, and the elderly."

In a recent , Finnish phone-maker Nokia proposed a tattoo that would vibrate when the person gets a phone call or serve as a mobile-device password and attach to the skin with "ferromagnetic powder."

Other envisioned gadgets would go under the skin.

MICROCHIPS of Lexington, Mass., recently reported success testing a microchip implanted waist high that automatically provided daily doses of medicine to osteoporosis patients. In February, regulators approved an eye implant by Second Sight Medical Products of Sylmar that lets the visually impaired see shapes and movements transmitted to the implant from a camera on their glasses. And University of Southern California scientists are studying implanted chips to restore memories in people with dementia, strokes or other brain damage.

Among the critical issues to be resolved is how to keep implanted devices updated with the latest software, maintain their battery power and shield them hackers. But Eric Dishman, who heads Intel's health care innovation team, predicts the - particularly those providing health benefits - will become common some day.

"There's going to be an ecosystem of things on and in the body," he predicted, adding, "this is the ultimate in personalized medicine."

Explore further: Neck tattoo patent filing from Motorola targets improved sound

4.9 /5 (7 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Intel prepared for shifts in computing, new CEO says

Sep 11, 2013

Discounting critics who contend it is mired in the slowing personal-computer market, microchip giant Intel Corp. assured a gathering of industry experts Tuesday that it is well-positioned to profit from the fast-changing ...

FDA approves use of electronic chips in medications

Aug 01, 2012

(Medical Xpress) -- The Food and Drug Administration in the United States has approved a request by Proteus Digital Health to allow for the inclusion of tiny digestible microchips into medicines to assist ...

Recommended for you

White House backs use of body cameras by police

2 hours ago

Requiring police officers to wear body cameras is one potential solution for bridging deep mistrust between law enforcement and the public, the White House said, weighing in on a national debate sparked by the shooting of ...

Apple helps iTunes users delete free U2 album

11 hours ago

Apple on Monday began helping people boot U2 off their iTunes accounts after a cacophony of complaints about not wanting the automatically downloaded free album by the Irish rock band.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TheGhostofOtto1923
3.7 / 5 (3) Dec 24, 2013
Well sure, many people will soon be tagged with networks of interacting implants which will be impossible to remove without alerting authorities. Children will probably be tagged first and constantly monitored per location, physical and emotional state. This will be essential in the coming surveilled world where crime will be impossible.

Most everything of value will be tagged and constantly monitored by AI. AI will detect rage or delirium and dispatch help and restraint before crimes can be committed.

Implants will be able to record everything we ingest and determine how our bodies react to it, recommending supplements, drugs, and dietary changes as needed.

Soon artificial livers and kidneys which function far better than the originals will begin removing toxins, contagions, and metastases and dosing us with hormones and nutrients. We will have these replaced like we replace the filters in our cars.

And obamacare will pay for all of it. That's what it is for.
Anda
not rated yet Dec 25, 2013
I won't personally touch my brain...
How are we supposed to enhance something that we don't know yer how it works?
That's really stupid right now
TheGhostofOtto1923
3.7 / 5 (3) Dec 25, 2013
I won't personally touch my brain...
How are we supposed to enhance something that we don't know yer how it works?
That's really stupid right now


I won't personally touch my brain...
How are we supposed to enhance something that we don't know yer how it works?
That's really stupid right now
We began augmenting our brains when we started writing things down. We augment our brains with computers, phones, and eyeglasses. Implanting these things is no different.
Osiris1
not rated yet Dec 29, 2013
Arnold Schwarzeneggar, move over for the real 'SkyNet'! Da 'Rise of the Machines, Judgement Day' is coming to a surgeon near you for your mind controller (AKA life termination switch when you do not obey) brain and heart implant. Probably come with its own GPS to make sure no one is near for 'collateral damage' when the NSA satellite sends down the signal to trigger your autotermination. Course maybe Iranian or Chinese hackers will hack that satellite and terminate all Americans with one keypress, just like they took over that American recon drone just a few months ago. Iranians landed it intact, reverse engineered it and now their own 'bootleg' copies are flying all over the place. Maybe ALL over the world too!