Cheating students more likely to want government jobs, study finds

Nov 20, 2013 by Emily Alpert Reyes

College students who cheated on a simple task were more likely to want government jobs, researchers from Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania found in a study of hundreds of students in Bangalore, India.

Their results, recently released as a working paper by the National Bureau of Economic Research, suggest that one of the contributing forces behind could be who gets into government work in the first place.

For instance, "if people have the view that jobs in government are corrupt, people who are honest might not want to get into that system," said Rema Hanna, an associate professor at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. To combat that problem, governments may need to find new ways to screen people seeking jobs, she said.

Researchers ran a series of experiments with more than 600 students finishing up college in India. In one task, students had to privately roll a die and report what number they got. The higher the number, the more they would get paid. Each student rolled the die 42 times.

Although researchers do not know for sure if any one student lied, they could tell whether the numbers each person reported were wildly different from what would turn up randomly - in other words, whether there were a suspiciously high number of 5s and 6s in their results.

Cheating seemed to be rampant: More than a third of students had scores that fell in the top 1 percent of the predicted distribution, researchers found. Students who apparently cheated were 6.3 percent more likely to say they wanted to work in government, the researchers found.

"Overall, we find that dishonest individuals - as measured by the dice task - prefer to enter government service," wrote Hanna and co-author Shing-yi Wang, an assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School.

They added, "Importantly, we show that cheating on this task is also predictive of fraudulent behaviors by real government officials."

The same test, given to a smaller set of government nurses, showed that those who appear to have cheated with the dice were also more likely to skip work. Previous studies suggest that the bulk of such absenteeism is fraudulent, Hanna said.

Researchers also ran other tests to gauge character: In another experiment, students played a game in which they could send a message anonymously to another player, either telling them honestly what move would earn them more money, or dishonestly nudging them toward a worse choice. Tricking the other student would help them gain more money.

A third test asked students to divide up a sum of rupees between themselves and a charity of their choice; for each rupee they chose to donate, the amount given to charity would double. Still other tests measured their memory and cognitive ability, or quizzed students about whether they would cheat on exams or believed that most businesses paid bribes.

Their findings differed from test to test: In the charity test, keeping more rupees for themselves was more common among government worker wannabes. However, lying during the message game seemed to have no correlation with whether students wanted to go into government work.

Researchers speculated that the difference between that game and the dice test, both of which measure dishonesty, could be that students felt differently about stealing from other than "the experimenters" who ran the dice game. Hanna added that it's harder to tell if a particular person cheated during the dice game, which might affect their actions.

Surveying people about corruption also did little to predict whether people were prone to lie in real life, the researchers concluded - a troubling finding for governments that have folded such questions into job screening. Nor did ability seem to make a difference.

Complaints of corruption have stirred up past scandals in India, which ranked 94th out of 176 countries and territories in perceived corruption, according to a Transparency International index. Hanna said she was curious whether the same results turn up in other countries where workers get higher wages and corruption is seen as less of a problem.

Explore further: Study finds Harlem charter school students more likely to attend college

4.9 /5 (10 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

When rulers can't understand the ruled

13 hours ago

Johns Hopkins University political scientists wanted to know if America's unelected officials have enough in common with the people they govern to understand them.

When casualties increased, war coverage became more negative

17 hours ago

As the number of U.S. casualties rose in Afghanistan, reporters filed more stories about the conflict and those articles grew increasingly negative about both the war effort and the military, according to a Penn State researcher. ...

Poll surveys residents of two war-torn African nations

22 hours ago

Researchers fanned out in one of the most dangerous corners of the globe late last year, asking residents of a brutalized part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) their thoughts on violence, security, ...

Drunk driving women treated differently than men

22 hours ago

A study by Victoria University of Wellington's Health Services Research Centre explores attitudes and behaviours surrounding women and drink-driving, and the extent to which they have changed over the past decade.

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

bearly
5 / 5 (2) Nov 20, 2013
Sooo.. it would seem that not only the politicians are corrupt but their staff as well.
jalmy
2 / 5 (8) Nov 20, 2013
Just as criminal minds drift toward criminal enterprise so do the unscrupulous drift toward government jobs. It is simple supply and demand, government jobs supply the most possibilities to cheat the average Joe. Second only to C.F.O's.
Lurker2358
1 / 5 (7) Nov 21, 2013
This reminds me of police officers who use Entrapment to catch people buying drugs.

The Officer is treated as a reliable witness to the "Crime", which he entraps the buyer in by lying and other forms of deception, to claim to be selling the drug, such as Cocaine or Heroin.

Now if we know the Officer is a liar, because he uses lying to try to catch drug addicts and drug dealers, then how can you trust a guy who is and must be a habitual liar when he is on the stand giving testimony?

He could make up shit, and it's his word vs the defendant, and people will take the officer's word nearly every time. These guys could easily arrest 50 people per day with this scam if they wanted to....even make up completely fake charges. Who would believe the defendant if an officer claims he had a dime bag of marijauna or some rocks? Nobody. that's who.
Agomemnon
1.5 / 5 (8) Nov 21, 2013
birds of a feather
QuixoteJ
1 / 5 (6) Nov 21, 2013
In one task, students had to privately roll a die and report what number they got. The higher the number, the more they would get paid. Each student rolled the die 42 times... Cheating seemed to be rampant.
The article also suggests that these students will be more successful at Dungeons and Dragons.
jalmy
1.6 / 5 (7) Nov 22, 2013
The article also suggests that these students will be more successful at Dungeons and Dragons.

Fortunately unlike the government. Dungeons and Dragons has built in checks and balances designed to thwart cheating.
NikFromNYC
1.7 / 5 (6) Nov 24, 2013
Don't leave out government scientists too. The Food Pyramid comes to mind, and environmentalism.