Brand loyalty not always a benefit, study finds

November 11, 2013 by Victoria Fryer

Brand commitment might not always be a good thing, and in the case of high-severity recalls, consumers with a high level of brand commitment may actually respond more negatively than those with less loyalty, according to researchers.

The findings come from a study by a team of researchers that included Raj Grewal, Irving & Irene Bard Professor of Marketing at the Penn State Smeal College of Business.

Brand commitment is found in consumers who are "attached to brands, form close relationships with them and have a general desire to maintain this close relationship," said the researchers, who have published their findings in Marketing Letters: A Journal of Research in Marketing.

The prevailing wisdom is that brand commitment will help brands retain their standing among consumers in the case of negative attention like a product recall, but the researchers found the reality to be more nuanced.

In cases of high-severity recalls—recalls of products that could cause serious injury or death—Grewal and his colleagues found that brand commitment actually acted as a liability.

"Committed consumers may come to expect more from the brand they like and thus feel especially disappointed when the brand gets recalled," the researchers wrote. "Indeed, committed consumers might view a as a 'breach of contract,' and hence might exhibit more negative responses following a recall announcement than their less committed counterparts."

On the other hand, in cases of low-severity or ambiguous product recalls, Grewal and his colleagues confirm that brand commitment can help mitigate fallout. Previous research shows that tend to resist negative information regarding brands they love, so brand can be helpful in the case of recalls that have a lower possibility of negative effects.

Explore further: The Starbucks effect: Committed customers don't like logo redesigns, research finds

More information: "Product Recalls and the Moderating Role of Brand Commitment" is currently available online: link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11002-013-9250-5

Related Stories

Brand-conscious consumers take bad news to heart

August 15, 2011

Consumers with close ties to a brand respond to negative information about the beloved brand as they do to personal failure – they experience it as a threat to their self-image, according to a new study by a University ...

Value or attention: Why do consumers prefer familiar products?

December 11, 2012

Consumers are more likely to purchase a product if they have previously focused their attention on it but are less likely to purchase a product they have previously ignored, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer ...

Recommended for you

Early human diet explains our eating habits

August 31, 2015

Much attention is being given to what people ate in the distant past as a guide to what we should eat today. Advocates of the claimed palaeodiet recommend that we should avoid carbohydrates and load our plates with red meat ...

Just how good (or bad) is the fossil record of dinosaurs?

August 28, 2015

Everyone is excited by discoveries of new dinosaurs – or indeed any new fossil species. But a key question for palaeontologists is 'just how good is the fossil record?' Do we know fifty per cent of the species of dinosaurs ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.