Most Americans pay little attention to genetically modified foods, survey says

Nov 04, 2013
Most Americans pay little attention to genetically modified foods, survey says

A national survey shows that most Americans pay little attention to the debate over genetically modified foods, despite extensive media coverage of the issue.

The survey, released by researchers at Rutgers University, found that more than half (53 percent) say they know very little or nothing at all about genetically modified (GM) foods, and one in four (25 percent) say they have never heard of them. Even with the media attention resulting from recent ballot initiatives in California (Proposition 37) and Washington State (Initiative 522) and legislative actions in at least 20 other states that would require labeling of GM foods, the Rutgers study found that only about a quarter (26 percent) of Americans realize that current regulations do not require GM products to be labeled.

"Americans do care about what's in their food, and they do read ," said William Hallman, professor of human ecology in Rutgers' School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, and lead author of the study. "Eighty-two percent of the respondents told us they sometimes or frequently or always read . But determining what labeling information they value is not a straightforward task. Whether consumers say they want GM food labels depends on how you ask the question, so we asked about it in several ways."

Before introducing the idea of GM foods, the survey participants were asked simply "What information would you like to see on food labels that is not already on there?" In response, only 7 percent raised GM food labeling on their own. A similar number (6 percent) said they wanted more information about where the food product was grown or processed. In contrast, when asked directly whether GM foods should be required to be labeled, 73 percent said yes.

The survey asked respondents to rate the importance of various kinds of information on food labels. Fifty-nine percent said that it was very or extremely important to have information about whether the product contains GM ingredients on a label. This is about the same number who indicated that it was similarly important to have information about whether the product was grown using hormones (63 percent), pesticides (62 percent), or antibiotics (61 percent), whether it was grown or raised in the United States (60 percent), and whether the product contains allergens (59 percent).

Genetic modification of food involves the transfer of one or more genes to a plant or animal using the tools of biotechnology in order to express a desired trait, such as pest resistance. Recent estimates suggest that 90 percent of the corn, 93 soybeans and 95 percent of the sugar beets grown in the United States are GM varieties. Experts say most processed foods in the United States contain an ingredient from a GM crop.

Nonetheless, the survey showed considerable confusion regarding GM food and food ingredients. Fewer than half of Americans (43 percent) are aware that such products are available in supermarkets, and only about one quarter (26 percent) believe that they have ever eaten food containing GM ingredients.

Even those who say they are aware of the presence of GM foods in American stores are unclear about which foods are available. While three quarters correctly recognized that GM corn products are on store shelves, more than half mistakenly believed that GM tomatoes, wheat and chicken products are in supermarkets. More than 40 percent believe incorrectly that GM apples and rice are on the market, and more than a third believe that GM salmon and GM oranges are currently on offer.

Proponents of GM food labeling say that this confusion presents a strong case for mandatory labels. Opponents argue that mandatory labels would lead consumers to avoid GM foods altogether, despite the fact that the FDA and other food safety agencies have found that GM food products are safe. In fact, only 45 percent agreed that they thought it was safe to eat GM foods (only 8 percent strongly agreed), 63 percent of Americans report they would be upset if they were served GM food in a restaurant without knowing it, and 54 percent say they would be willing to pay more for food that was not genetically modified.

"Supporters and opponents of GM labeling have spent tens of millions of dollars to influence public opinion about GM labels around the country," Hallman said. "However, the results of our study suggest that most Americans still don't know much about GM foods, don't know they are eating them and are unaware that they don't have to be labeled. As a result, whether consumers want GM labels depends a great deal on how you ask the question."

The respondents were part of a nationally representative Internet-based panel, and the data reported here have been weighted to be nationally representative, with a +/- 3% margin of error. A summary of the study's findings is available online at humeco.rutgers.edu/documents_P… elingperceptions.pdf . The study authors are Hallman, Cara L. Cuite, and Xenia K. Morin, all of the School of Environmental and Biological Sciences.

Explore further: Critical consumers do often buy genetically modified food

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Critical consumers do often buy genetically modified food

Oct 15, 2013

Many people disapprove of genetically modified food. You would therefore expect them to avoid these products in supermarkets. Dutch researchers at TU Delft have revealed that by no means all European consumers ...

US state moves to regulate GM foods

Jun 04, 2013

The small US state of Connecticut became the first to pass legislation requiring food products with genetically modified ingredients to be labeled as such.

Key points in the genetically modified food debate

Aug 02, 2013

One of the biggest stumbling blocks to securing a massive free trade agreement between the United States and Europe is a sharp disagreement on genetically modified foods. Much of the corn, soybean, sugar beets and cotton ...

EU recommends testing of US wheat after GM find

May 31, 2013

The European Union is urging its 27 member states to test certain wheat shipments from the United States after unauthorized genetically modified grains were found on a U.S. farm, officials said Friday.

GMO corn, soybeans dominate US market

Jun 04, 2013

The discovery of unauthorized genetically engineered wheat growing on a farm in the US state of Oregon has cast a spotlight on agricultural biotechnology and the debate about its safety.

Monsanto drops bid to grow new GM foods in EU

Jul 18, 2013

US agro-chemicals giant Monsanto said Thursday it will drop all requests to be allowed to grow new genetically modified foods in the European Union, which has for years held up approval.

Recommended for you

Controlling the transition between generations

4 hours ago

Rafal Ciosk and his group at the FMI have identified an important regulator of the transition from germ cell to embryonic cell. LIN-41 prevents the premature onset of embryonic transcription in oocytes poised ...

Iberian pig genome remains unchanged after five centuries

Sep 17, 2014

A team of Spanish researchers have obtained the first partial genome sequence of an ancient pig. Extracted from a sixteenth century pig found at the site of the Montsoriu Castle in Girona, the data obtained indicates that ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Chromodynamix
not rated yet Nov 05, 2013
I am not of the anti GMO brigade, but think GMO labeling of products should be done. (90% of processed food contain GMOs anyway). People should not be 'tricked' into consuming GMOs and still be given the choice.
This survey indicates most wouldn't be bothered!
kochevnik
1 / 5 (2) Nov 05, 2013
Most Chinese pay little attention to foods cooked in oil scraped from sewers and drains. They call it gutter oil. So by the logic of this survey, eating sewage is no problem
Mike_Massen
3 / 5 (2) Nov 12, 2013
kochevnik could do with some bacteriology before uttering this
Most Chinese pay little attention to foods cooked in oil scraped from sewers and drains.They call it gutter oil. So by the logic of this survey, eating sewage is no problem
If a survey has been done on the perception amongst the Chinese then spill the beans kochevnik otherwise your arbitrary opinionated claim has no credibility or merit.

It is likely deception is common where food is cooked and the consumer is none the wiser.

The good thing is, for the most part frying in oils from such sources might not be that bad as the temperature will kill all pathogens even spore formers as its > 132 deg C. However its unclear if the various bacterial toxins such as from S.Aureus will be changed as such to reduce toxicity or just be bound deeper into fats so they arent so readily absorbed.

In any case its likely those collecting such oils would consider appearance of some import and likely to wash the oil to a fair degree.