A glimpse into the future of robotic technology

Aug 23, 2013
A glimpse into the future of robotic technology
Credit: Shutterstock

Replicating human behaviour in robots has long been a central objective of scientists working in the field of information and communication technologies (ICT).

However, a major obstacle towards accomplishing this has been controlling the interaction between movement and vision. Indeed, achieving accurate spatial perception and smooth visual-motor coordination have proved elusive.

Tackling this issue was the main aim of an EU-funded project EYESHOTS ('Heterogeneous 3-D perception across visual fragments'). By simulating human learning mechanisms, the project successfully built a prototype robot capable of achieving awareness of its surroundings and using its memory to reach smoothly for objects.

The implications of this breakthrough are not limited to potential improvements in robotic mechanics - they will also help to achieve better diagnoses and rehabilitation techniques for degenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease.

The project began by examining human and animal biology. A multi-disciplinary team involving experts in robotics, neuroscience, engineering and psychology built computer models based on neural coordination in monkeys (very similar to how human coordination works).

The key was recognising that our eyes move so quickly that the images produced are in fact blurred - it is up to the brain to piece together these blurred fragments and present a more coherent image of our surroundings.

Using this neural information, the project built a unique computer model that combined visual images with movements of both eyes and arms, similar to what occurs in the cerebral cortex of the human brain.

In effect, the project was built on the premise that being fully aware of the visual space around you can only be achieved through actively exploring it. This, after all, is how humans learn to understand the physical world - by looking around, reaching out and grabbing things.

In everyday life, the experience of the 3D space around us is mediated through movements of the eyes, head and arms, which allow us to observe, reach, and grasp objects in the environment. From this perspective, the motor system of a humanoid robot should be an integral part of its perceptual machinery.

The end result of this approach is a humanoid robot that can move its eyes and focus on one point, and even learn from experience and use its memory to reach for objects without having to see them first. The robotic system comprises a torso with articulated arms and a robot head with moving eyes.

Through the application of neuroscience, the EYESHOTS project, completed in 2011, successfully identified a means of giving robots a sense of sight similar to human vision. This represents an important milestone in creating a that can interact with its environment and perform tasks without supervision.

Explore further: Q&A: Drones might help explain how tornadoes form

More information: EYESHOTS www.eyeshots.it/

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Humanoid robot that sees and maps

Jul 02, 2013

(Phys.org) —Computer vision algorithms that enable Samsung's latest humanoid robot, Roboray, to build real-time 3D visual maps to move around more efficiently have been developed by researchers from the ...

Robots: How long before they're part of the family?

Aug 06, 2013

Low-cost, high-performance sensors, such as digital cameras, and advances in computer vision and artificial intelligence are bringing the age of robots ever closer, says QUT robotics scientist Dr Feras Dayoub.

Dragonflies can see by switching 'on' and 'off'

Aug 15, 2013

(Phys.org) —Researchers at the University of Adelaide have discovered a novel and complex visual circuit in a dragonfly's brain that could one day help to improve vision systems for robots.

Flying robots get off the ground

Jun 17, 2013

Attaching a platform to a high-rise building to evacuate people in an emergency, or creating a landing stage for an aircraft on uneven terrain - these are just two areas in which flying robots could have ...

Recommended for you

Fuel cells to connect our smartphones to the outside world

4 minutes ago

The potential of hydrogen and fuel cell applications goes way beyond the development of green cars. The FCPOWEREDRBS team is determined to prove this with a Fuel Cell technology to power off-grid telecom stations. They believe ...

China condemns 'cyber terrorism' in wake of Sony attack

2 hours ago

China's foreign minister condemned all forms of "cyber terrorism" in talks with his American counterpart, a statement said Monday, as the US accused Beijing's ally North Korea with being behind a cyber attack on Sony Pictures.

BlackBerry rides with Boeing on self-destruct phone

2 hours ago

The news from Reuters on Friday came as no shock to those who know Blackberry's strong rep for security (John Chen, the company's CEO, is not shy about promoting the company's branding message of safety. ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Egleton
1 / 5 (1) Aug 23, 2013
We are going to need robots if we are to survive a 35 year population doubling time.
We cannot build the necessary habitats out of this gravity well. We need shielding from ionizing radiation.
It will be an existential wrench to realize that this planet of our is not the vast majority of
reality.
At the moment we only acknowledge this on an intellectual level.
We say "Yes of cause the planet is just a blue dot. I know that!"
But we continue to act as though the dot is all that the Cosmos has to offer us.
For this flaw we will die in our billions.
Many orders of magnitude more people can live at either of the legange points than exist on this planet. And they are not all that is on offer.
Time to leave the womb.
BetAmakeR
not rated yet Aug 23, 2013
We are going to need robots if we are to survive a 35 year population doubling time.
We cannot build the necessary habitats out of this gravity well. We need shielding from ionizing radiation.
It will be an existential wrench to realize that this planet of our is not the vast majority of
reality.
At the moment we only acknowledge this on an intellectual level.
We say "Yes of cause the planet is just a blue dot. I know that!"
But we continue to act as though the dot is all that the Cosmos has to offer us.
For this flaw we will die in our billions.
Many orders of magnitude more people can live at either of the legange points than exist on this planet. And they are not all that is on offer.
Time to leave the womb.


Great hypothesis, fully support your endeavour

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.