Silicon Valley idealists crash into reality in spy row

Jun 10, 2013 by Rob Lever
The "Facebook" logo is seen on a tablet screen on December 4, 2012 in Paris. The idealists who founded some of the most successful technology companies now find themselves entangled in controversy over the vast US government surveillance program denounced as Orwellian.

The idealists who founded some of the most successful technology companies now find themselves entangled in controversy over the vast US government surveillance program denounced as Orwellian.

Ironically, the firms accused of being part of a Big Brother network began with lofty ideals such as 's to make the world "more open and connected" or 's "to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful."

"By the times the companies are making billions of dollars they are probably not that idealistic anymore," said Roger Kay, an analyst and consultant with Endpoint Technologies Associates who has followed the sector since the early days of the Internet.

"They have had to make decisions to make money rather than protecting the rights of their users," he added.

Joseph Hall, senior technologist at the Washington-based Center for Democracy and Technology, said companies like Google, Facebook and Apple end up collecting vast amounts of data in a quest to "monetize" their large user base, and thus become important targets for law enforcement.

"The move to the cloud is significant," Hall said. "All that data is available because so much and storage is sourced so quickly."

Hall said that as companies mature after public share offerings, "there is a lot of pressure to do things that are different from their idealistic missions. They have to create value for the shareholders."

Under the PRISM program, revealed in the past week, the secretive can issue directives to demanding access to emails, online chats, pictures, files, videos and more, uploaded by foreign users.

Some of the biggest tech firms were caught up in the program, including Microsoft, Yahoo!, Google, Facebook, Apple, PalTalk, AOL, and YouTube.

The service providers deny they have given the government backdoor access to , insisting they provide data only when compelled by law.

A picture shows logos of Google on December 4, 2012 during LeWeb Paris 2012 in Saint-Denis near Paris.

The polemic in the United States comes at the same time as other nations, including China, use online technology to spy on their citizens, highlighting concerns that the Internet is being subverted by governments.

"Unwarranted government surveillance is an intrusion on basic human rights that threatens the very foundations of a democratic society," Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, said in a statement to the Financial Times.

"I call on all Web users to demand better legal protection and due process safeguards for the privacy of their online communications, including their right to be informed when someone requests or stores their data."

Lee and other Internet pioneers have always viewed the Internet as a means to enhance personal freedom. His World Wide Web Foundation is dedicated "to achieving a world in which all people can use the Web to communicate, collaborate and innovate freely, building bridges across the divides that threaten our shared future."

CDT's Hall said that "the epitome of idealism is two people in their garage creating great services," but that when companies grow, "it becomes more complicated."

These firms "come off looking very Big Brother, but to be fair, we don't really know what is going on without getting classified briefings."

He noted, however, that "their continued success depends on protecting user privacy" and they need to reassure their customers that data is protected.

Kay noted that customers of the tech giants "always felt they could trust the companies" and that there is a danger that "the customers may become cynical."

Kay said many facets of PRISM remain unclear, including why some firms have remained outside the system, and why Apple was not a participant until 2012, after the death of founder Steve Jobs.

"I imagine that Steve Jobs told the government to forget about it," Kay said.

Kay said that tracking technology has been around for some time, but that revelations of the PRISM suggest "a sea change."

"Even though this has been coming a long time, the 'total information awareness' world is upon us, and it arrived rather suddenly," he said.

Explore further: Entrepreneur, activist Sina Khanifar on digital copyright reform

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Google, Facebook condemn online spying

Jun 08, 2013

Google chief Larry Page and Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg condemned online spying Friday and called for governments to be more revealing about snooping on the Internet.

US data mining system technical details murky

Jun 08, 2013

The US government's vast online data collection system revealed this week could tap into companies like Google and Facebook without the knowledge of top executives, experts said.

Push for US Internet 'wiretap' law faces tough road

Jun 02, 2013

The FBI is stepping up its effort to get broader authority to put "wiretaps" on the Internet to catch criminals and terrorists. But the move is drawing fire from civil liberties groups, technology firms and others who claim ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

VendicarE
3.4 / 5 (5) Jun 10, 2013
So now the U.S. government knows, just as Google knows, that RyggTard is a major consumer of Donkey Porn.

BSD
1 / 5 (3) Jun 16, 2013
Idealism is another word for naivety. Really. Did anyone seriously think there was privacy on the Internet?

So now the U.S. government knows, just as Google knows, that RyggTard is a major consumer of Donkey Porn.


Guffaw :P