Throwing the bum out: When should scandal-hit politicians stage a come back?

Jun 17, 2013

As Anthony Weiner enters the New York mayoral race two years after scandal forced him from office, a new study in Social Science Quarterly explores the lingering effect of scandals and asks how long a politician need wait before hitting the come-back trail.

Using research into 'brand crisis' this study is the first systematic test of the idea that scandals can linger in voters' minds and damage a 's . The authors find evidence that this lingering effect ensures politicians do not return to their pre-scandal predicted margins of victory until four to six years after the event.

Voter turnout was also found to increase following a scandal, but rather than an increase in votes for the incumbent, this was linked to the voters' desire to 'kick the bum out.'

However, if a politician succeeds in surviving a reelection bid despite a scandal, they can expect to recover two-thirds of their support within one cycle, moving them out of the '' into which their scandal pushed them.

"Even though scandals are one of the few ways incumbents become vulnerable at the , challengers must strike while the iron is hot," said Dr Rodrigo Praino. "Scandal-ridden incumbents do lose votes in the election immediately after the scandal, but those who manage to stay in office regain the ground that they have lost in only two election cycles. Coupled with the fact that the elections right after the scandal tend to present slightly higher levels of voter turnout, challengers have a very short, but clear, window of opportunity to convince voters to 'throw the bum out'."

Explore further: Local education politics 'far from dead'

More information: Rodrigo Praino, Daniel Stockemer, Vincent G. Moscardelli, 'The Lingering Effect of Scandals in Congressional Elections: Incumbents, Challengers, and Voters', Social Science Quarterly, June 2013, DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12046

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Would you buy a product endorsed by Lance Armstrong?

Oct 22, 2012

It's much easier for consumers to justify continued support of a celebrity or politician disgraced by scandal when they separate moral judgments about a public figure from assessments of their professional performance, according ...

Cashing in on scandal

Jun 23, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Scandals in sport are unavoidable and managers and sponsors should start looking for marketing opportunities in bad behaviour, according to a new study.

Recommended for you

Local education politics 'far from dead'

9 hours ago

Teach for America, known for recruiting teachers, is also setting its sights on capturing school board seats across the nation. Surprisingly, however, political candidates from the program aren't just pushing ...

First grade reading suffers in segregated schools

9 hours ago

A groundbreaking study from the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute (FPG) has found that African-American students in first grade experience smaller gains in reading when they attend segregated schools—but the ...

Why aren't consumers buying remanufactured products?

11 hours ago

Firms looking to increase market share of remanufactured consumer products will have to overcome a big barrier to do so, according to a recent study from the Penn State Smeal College of Business. Findings from faculty members ...

Expecting to teach enhances learning, recall

11 hours ago

People learn better and recall more when given the impression that they will soon have to teach newly acquired material to someone else, suggests new research from Washington University in St. Louis.

Understanding the economics of human trafficking

Jul 28, 2014

Although Europe is one of the strictest regions in the world when it comes to guaranteeing the respect of human rights, the number of people trafficked to or within the EU still amounts to several hundred ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mvg
1 / 5 (2) Jun 17, 2013
Perhaps the low 'scandal memory' simply reflects the present low ethics of the electorate itself.

Sleaze is something they can identify with.