Throwing the bum out: When should scandal-hit politicians stage a come back?

June 17, 2013

As Anthony Weiner enters the New York mayoral race two years after scandal forced him from office, a new study in Social Science Quarterly explores the lingering effect of scandals and asks how long a politician need wait before hitting the come-back trail.

Using research into 'brand crisis' this study is the first systematic test of the idea that scandals can linger in voters' minds and damage a 's . The authors find evidence that this lingering effect ensures politicians do not return to their pre-scandal predicted margins of victory until four to six years after the event.

Voter turnout was also found to increase following a scandal, but rather than an increase in votes for the incumbent, this was linked to the voters' desire to 'kick the bum out.'

However, if a politician succeeds in surviving a reelection bid despite a scandal, they can expect to recover two-thirds of their support within one cycle, moving them out of the '' into which their scandal pushed them.

"Even though scandals are one of the few ways incumbents become vulnerable at the , challengers must strike while the iron is hot," said Dr Rodrigo Praino. "Scandal-ridden incumbents do lose votes in the election immediately after the scandal, but those who manage to stay in office regain the ground that they have lost in only two election cycles. Coupled with the fact that the elections right after the scandal tend to present slightly higher levels of voter turnout, challengers have a very short, but clear, window of opportunity to convince voters to 'throw the bum out'."

Explore further: Average voter is unable to accurately assess politicians, new research shows

More information: Rodrigo Praino, Daniel Stockemer, Vincent G. Moscardelli, 'The Lingering Effect of Scandals in Congressional Elections: Incumbents, Challengers, and Voters', Social Science Quarterly, June 2013, DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12046

Related Stories

Would you buy a product endorsed by Lance Armstrong?

October 22, 2012

It's much easier for consumers to justify continued support of a celebrity or politician disgraced by scandal when they separate moral judgments about a public figure from assessments of their professional performance, according ...

Cashing in on scandal

June 23, 2010

( -- Scandals in sport are unavoidable and managers and sponsors should start looking for marketing opportunities in bad behaviour, according to a new study.

Recommended for you

Ancient burials suggestive of blood feuds

October 24, 2016

There is significant variation in how different cultures over time have dealt with the dead. Yet, at a very basic level, funerals in the Sonoran Desert thousands of years ago were similar to what they are today. Bodies of ...

Meet Savannasaurus, Australia's newest titanosaur

October 21, 2016

The outback region around Winton in central Queensland is arguably Australia's ground zero for giant dinosaur fossils. Here, graziers occasionally stumble across petrified bones on their paddocks, amid the stubbly grass and ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Jun 17, 2013
Perhaps the low 'scandal memory' simply reflects the present low ethics of the electorate itself.

Sleaze is something they can identify with.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.