Study finds racial diversity of students beneficial in higher education

Aug 10, 2012

(Phys.org) -- A racially diverse law student body provides educational benefits for students, their institution and society, according to a 10-year multidisciplinary research study conducted by four professors, including two faculty members at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

An article on the study’s results, “Does Race Matter in Educational Diversity? A Legal and Empirical Analysis,” will be published in the summer issue of “Rutgers Race & the Law Review.” The article is available online at Social Science Research Network: ssrn.com/abstract=2101253 .

The study’s release is particularly timely since the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it will hear arguments in the fall on Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, a case involving the consideration of race in college admissions. Today UNC filed an amicus brief in the case, one of about 10 universities expected to do so.

“The question of whether race may be considered in admissions of students to professional programs, as well as undergraduate schools, has been a subject of controversy at least since 1978 when the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, upheld limited use of race in admission decisions,” said study co-author Charles E. Daye, Henry Brandis Professor of Law at the UNC School of Law and deputy director of the UNC Center for Civil Rights. “This is an important educational, political and societal question and one that is still being raised.”

When retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in a 2010 essay that “further social science research is needed in order to refine our appreciation of diversity’s value,” the researchers for this study – the Educational Diversity Project – had already been collecting data on the value of diversity in education for eight years.

“It’s so gratifying to see a study that is rigorously designed, multidisciplinary and involving data from many sources to address a critical issue in higher education today,” said study co-author Abigail T. Panter, Bowman and Gordon Gray Professor of Psychology at UNC. “Collaborative groups like ours can produce data that are useful for people to evaluate, which is especially important in the current climate when the will be involved.”

The research team was itself diverse, coming from the disciplines of law (Daye), psychology (Panter), sociology (Walter R. Allen of the University of California, Los Angeles) and educational research methodology (Linda F. Wightman of UNC Greensboro).

Over a decade, the researchers examined links of race (and other factors) with educational diversity, tracking law students from their enrollment in law school through graduation. The study used national data from more than 6,500 incoming law students attending a random representative sample of 50 American Bar Association-approved U.S. law schools.

The researchers found that many observed racial differences among students contribute to learning because differences foster richer interactions and positive educational outcomes that benefit students, institutions and society. In addition, when a law school’s racial diversity was significant and group interaction was high, graduating perceived their law school as more open and respectful of diverse ideas.

This exposure to a diversity of viewpoints prepares the students to be better lawyers, making them more “culturally competent,” the researchers found. “Unless you plan to practice in a box, you’re going to be dealing with all kinds of races when you graduate, so you better have some of that respect or that appreciation that people can think differently,” said Aaron, a Northern California student quoted in the article.

“Our conclusion is that, because race matters and contributes to educational diversity, it would be a tragedy if educational institutions were told that the of applicants could not be in any way considered,” Daye said. “There is no other factor that will adequately target the qualities needed in a student body in which the can interact and learn from each other and learn the ways the others see the world.”

Explore further: Change 'authoritarian' football culture to produce future stars, says research

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The ever-expanding definition of 'diversity'

Feb 29, 2012

(Medical Xpress) -- Diversity has become a goal for all sorts of institutions—but what it means may depend on who you ask. A new study published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Scienc ...

Schools lose records; English learners pay

Apr 11, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Poor recordkeeping keeps California schools from getting all of the funding that they have coming, a failing that especially hurts English learners, according to research from the University of California, ...

Recommended for you

Male-biased tweeting

10 hours ago

Today women take an active part in public life. Without a doubt, they also converse with other women. In fact, they even talk to each other about other things besides men. As banal as it sounds, this is far ...

Developing nations ride a motorcycle boom

11 hours ago

Asia's rapidly developing economies should prepare for a full-throttle increase in motorcycle numbers as average incomes increase, a new study from The Australian National University has found.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

CapitalismPrevails
5 / 5 (1) Aug 10, 2012
because race MATTERS and contributes to educational diversity, it would be a tragedy if educational institutions were told that the race of applicants could not be in any way considered


This conclusion is inherently racist. So universities should be forced to make race distinctions in their student application process?

There is no other FACTOR that will adequately target the qualities needed in a student body

So should students try cosmetic race change operations? Apparently prior academic achievement isn't a relevant priority anymore but race is. We need to make ourselves feel good with affirmative action.
RogerClegg
5 / 5 (2) Aug 10, 2012
The fact that the study is completed just in time to be featured in a Supreme Court amicus brief should tell you something about its rigor; and if you have any doubt that this is more rhetoric than rigor, just read the call-to-arms language of the Conclusion.

It's ironic that the focus should be on law schools (not directly at issue in Fisher v. University of Texas, of course). This is an area where the mismatch problem has been shown to be extremely significant, but the word "mismatch" does not appear in the study, and there is only one (general and inapposite) cite to Richard Sander (who has published widely on the problem of mismatch, particularly in law schools). How can the benefits of diversity be shown to be compelling if the costs are ignored?

The real issue (to which the study doesn't speak) is whether there is a justification for using race as a PROXY for different backgrounds and perspectives. There isn't. Don't engage in race stereotyping; look for diversity of thought.
HerdAsperser
not rated yet Aug 14, 2012
This study is a perfect example of circular reasoning.

Their conclusion is basically saying, "Diversity is good because it creates diversity":

"The researchers found that many observed racial differences among students contribute to learning because differences foster richer interactions and positive educational outcomes that benefit students, institutions and society. In addition, when a law schools racial diversity was significant and group interaction was high, graduating law students perceived their law school as more open and respectful of diverse ideas."

hb_
not rated yet Aug 15, 2012
To add to the poor quality, is the fact that the authors have only showed that the students believe that they have become more open. Where is the objective measure of their perceived increase in "respect of diverse ideas"?

Do the students become less racist - not just more open to diverse perspectives - because of the mixed campus, and if so, where is the evidence?

"Researches" in humanistics simply lack achademic rigour and logic.

More news stories

Not just the poor live hand-to-mouth

When the economy hits the skids, government stimulus checks to the poor sometimes follow. Stimulus programs—such as those in 2001, 2008 and 2009—are designed to boost the economy quickly by getting cash ...

Male-biased tweeting

Today women take an active part in public life. Without a doubt, they also converse with other women. In fact, they even talk to each other about other things besides men. As banal as it sounds, this is far ...

Archaeologists, tribe clash over Native remains

Archaeologists and Native Americans are clashing over Indian remains and artifacts that were excavated during a construction project in the San Francisco Bay Area, but then reburied at an undisclosed location.

Math modeling handbook now available

Math comes in handy for answering questions about a variety of topics, from calculating the cost-effectiveness of fuel sources and determining the best regions to build high-speed rail to predicting the spread ...