Research examines decades of religious differences in attitudes about social issues

Aug 21, 2012 By Dawn Fuller
Paul Anderson

(Phys.org) -- New research out of the University of Cincinnati suggests that while some religious groups are becoming more tolerant in regard to some heated social issues, all are growing increasingly more conservative in their viewpoints on legalized abortion. Paul Anderson, a University of Cincinnati doctoral student in the UC Department of Sociology, will present his research on Aug. 20, at the 107th annual meeting of the American Sociological Association in Denver.

Anderson examined 38 years of data from the , a nationally representative survey of Americans that has been conducted on an annual or biennial basis since 1972. The data represented 55,087 participants from 1972-2010. On a scale ranging from one to four with higher numbers representing more liberal views, Anderson examined views of religious groups on four topics: elective abortion, traumatic abortion, homosexuality and .

Anderson also examined whether frequency of service attendance factored into dividing conservative and more liberal viewpoints on the four issues.

The GSS data centered on the following religious affiliations: Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, none and other. Protestants were divided into Fundamentalists, moderate and liberal.

On questions examining opinion on elective legal abortion, the GSS asked if it should be possible for a woman to obtain a legal abortion if:

  • The family was low-income and could not afford more children
  • A woman was married but did not want more children
  • A woman was not married, but did not want to marry the man involved in the pregnancy
On questions regarding traumatic legal abortion, the survey asked if it should be possible for a woman to obtain a legal abortion if:
  • There was a strong chance of serious defect in the
  • The woman became pregnant because of rape
  • The woman’s own health was seriously endangered by the pregnancy
Anderson says the study found that views toward legal abortion, whether for elective or traumatic reasons, had become more conservative over time. “The study indicates that American opinions toward legal abortion for elective reasons have significantly become more conservative in the past 38 years,” says Anderson. He says the data found that Catholics who frequently attended services remained persistently against abortion over the time period, while low-attending Catholics became more anti-abortion over the time period.

He says he also found a significant shift from 1972 to 2010 toward conservatism on opinions toward legal abortion for traumatic reasons.

However, he says the data indicates that American opinions on “whether or not is wrong have significantly liberalized since 1972, with American opinion moving from 1.69 in the earliest average to 2.30 in the latest average. This is a shift from an average viewpoint of always or almost wrong in 1972 to almost always and sometimes wrong in 2010,” states Anderson. “While this average still indicated negative views toward gay and lesbian relationships, the data indicates that Americans are becoming more accepting of gay and lesbian sexual relationships,” says Anderson.

In addition, the data indicated a slight increase toward acceptance of premarital sex.

“I also found that church attendance matters, with the less intensely religious reporting more tolerant views than the more intensely religious,” says Anderson. He says Fundamentalists, whether active or non-active, often produced the most conservative opinions on all four issues, while Liberal Protestants, whether active or non-active, held the most progressive views on the issues. Anderson writes that Catholics, with the exception of abortion, showed indications of becoming slightly more liberal over time on the issues, compared with the other religious groups, while conservative increasingly became more conservative.

Anderson says his future research will add geographic locations to examining whether Americans are becoming more polarized on divisive .

Explore further: Researchers study why we buy so much for Christmas

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

UK legislators reject curb on abortion advice

Sep 07, 2011

(AP) -- Britain's House of Commons has rejected a proposal to bar abortion providers from counseling women about their decisions on whether to terminate their pregnancies.

International team explores the stigma surrounding abortion

Jun 28, 2011

An international team of researchers says abortion stigma is under-researched, under theorized and over emphasized in one category: women who've had abortions. As a result, they're launching a new direction into research ...

Recommended for you

Gypsies and travellers on the English Green Belt

Oct 17, 2014

The battle between Gypsies, Travellers and the settled community over how land can be used has moved to the Green Belt, observes Peter Kabachnik of the City University of New York.

Cadavers beat computers for learning anatomy

Oct 16, 2014

Despite the growing popularity of using computer simulation to help teach college anatomy, students learn much better through the traditional use of human cadavers, according to new research that has implications ...

Mongolian women 'want status over big families'

Oct 16, 2014

A new study suggests the aspirations of women in Mongolia have rapidly shifted. Before the rapid economic transition of the 1990s, the wealthiest women in the Communist-style era had big families. However, ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rwinners
not rated yet Aug 21, 2012
There is a very simple answer to this phenomenon.
Religions, by and large, rely heavily on new births into their cults to offset those who fall away later... or just die.
It can be expected that more strident religious teachings strive to eliminate the loss that abortion causes the 'faithful'.