Nanoparticles seek and destroy groundwater toxins

June 4, 2012
Dr. Denis O'Carroll and colleagues at groundwater test site in Ontario, Canada

(Phys.org) -- Iron nanoparticles encapsulated in a rust-preventing polymer coating could hold incredible potential for cleaning up groundwater contaminated with toxic chemicals, a leading water expert says.

Hundreds of sites around Sydney where soils have been contaminated from past industrial waste, landfills and are known to exist, including the former HMAS Platypus submarine base in Neutral Bay and the Orica site in Botany Bay.

“Toxic contamination of soils is an historical problem,” says Dr. Denis O’Carroll, a visiting academic at the UNSW Water Research Lab. “Until the 1970s, people wrongly believed that if we put these toxins into the ground they would simply disappear – that the subsurface would act as a natural filtration unit.”

“The possibility of this waste polluting the environment, and potentially contaminating groundwater sources and remaining there for decades was ignored,” he says.

Far from magically disappearing, chemical contaminants from spilled gas and solvents, when not directly polluting surface waters, seep down into the earth, travelling through microscopic soil cracks, where they accumulate and can eventually reach the groundwater table.

Traditional clean-up methods have focussed on pumping out the contaminated water or flushing out toxins with a specially designed cleansing solution, but these are limited by difficulties in accurately pinpointing and accessing locations where contamination has occurred, says O’Carroll.

His approach is to tackle toxic contaminants with nanotechnology. O’Carroll, who is visiting UNSW from the University of Western Ontario in Canada, has been trialling an innovative new clean-up technology using metal nanoparticles 500 to 5,000 times narrower than a human hair.

The iron particles are injected directly into contaminated soil where they flow to the contaminants and initiate a redox reaction, whereby electrons are transferred between the particle and the pollutant. This reaction changes the oxidation state of the pollutant and diminishes its overall toxicity to safer levels, says O’Carroll. 

“The tiny scale of these nanoparticles allows them to move through microscopic flow channels in and rock to reach and destroy pollutants that larger particles cannot,” says O’Carroll.

In addition, iron nanoparticles are particularly safe for use in the environment as they are not very mobile and dissolve quickly, says O’Carroll. This, in fact, is somewhat of a detriment as it limits the nanoparticles’ ability to seek out and degrade toxins. 

To optimise the nanoparticles, O’Carroll is experimenting with different formations of iron, and encapsulating the particles in a rust-preventing polymer, which slows the dissolution process and increases their mobility, without any adverse environmental impacts.  

Two contaminated sites in Ontario have been used for field trials of the novel technology and “significant degradation of the contaminants at both sites has been observed”, says O’Carroll, whose research has been featured on David Suzuki's The Nature of Things

Explore further: Researcher finds differences but no general trends when potential contaminants bond to nanoparticles

Related Stories

Beer-barrel bacteria breathe toxic brew

August 1, 2011

University of New South Wales researchers have shown that they can safely destroy hazardous industrial toxins in groundwater arising from PVC plastic production by injecting naturally occurring bacteria into a contaminated ...

Could silicon be ideal in quantum computing?

September 16, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- "Quantum computing could provide a way to significantly speed up the way we process certain algorithms," Malcolm Carroll tells PhysOrg.com. "The primary issue, though, is that you need a well controlled two-level ...

Climate risk of toxic shock

February 6, 2012

The effects of climate change could expose Australians to greater risks from toxic contamination, a leading scientist has warned.

New nanoparticle technology cuts water use, energy costs

April 13, 2012

Nuclear and coal power plants are some of the thirstiest machines on earth. The turbines that spin inside of them to generate electricity require tons and tons of steam, and all of that water has to come from somewhere.

Recommended for you

For 2-D boron, it's all about that base

September 2, 2015

Rice University scientists have theoretically determined that the properties of atom-thick sheets of boron depend on where those atoms land.

Electrical circuit made of gel can repair itself

August 25, 2015

(Phys.org)—Scientists have fabricated a flexible electrical circuit that, when cut into two pieces, can repair itself and fully restore its original conductivity. The circuit is made of a new gel that possesses a combination ...

An engineered surface unsticks sticky water droplets

August 31, 2015

The leaves of the lotus flower, and other natural surfaces that repel water and dirt, have been the model for many types of engineered liquid-repelling surfaces. As slippery as these surfaces are, however, tiny water droplets ...

Scientists grow high-quality graphene from tea tree extract

August 21, 2015

(Phys.org)—Graphene has been grown from materials as diverse as plastic, cockroaches, Girl Scout cookies, and dog feces, and can theoretically be grown from any carbon source. However, scientists are still looking for a ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mrego
not rated yet Jun 05, 2012
Is there any worry about iron contamination?

Can this technology be used to remove a simple contaminant: salt?
eachus
not rated yet Jun 05, 2012
Is there any worry about iron contamination?

Iron as such is not a serious contaminant in groundwater. The problems occur when organic contamination results in anaerobic conditions turning insoluble ferric iron into soluble ferrous ions. See http://2the4.net/iron.htm for a short summary.

Can this technology be used to remove a simple contaminant: salt?

Short answer: reverse osmosis is the best way to remove salt. I'd have to know what you were trying to do to answer further. Metallic iron will react with salt water to remove the chlorine as Fe(Cl)3, but then you have to do something with the lye (NaOH) such as react it with fatty acids to make soap. Soapy water is not something you want to drink, but it is much better than a lye solution, even if it is still worse than the salt water you started with...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.