Research suggests that ancient granites made advanced life possible

Jun 21, 2012 By Chris Gorski
John Parnell examining granite in Laxford Brae, Sutherlandshire, U.K. Image credit: University of Aberdeen

A little less than 2 billion years ago, metals including copper, molybdenum and zinc became available to primitive cells, at the same time that the cells began to become much more complex. Scientists indicate that they have identified the event that introduced these metals, which made it possible for those primitive cells to develop, evolve, and spread.

The secret, according to researchers, was granite.

The new research suggests that the large amount of heat within the Earth at this time caused metal-laden magmas to rise from great depths, which cooled into granites near the surface. The scientists conclude that this event caused the substantial change in the Earth's surface and ocean chemistry that began about 2 billion years ago.

This hypothesis challenges the prevailing consensus that changes in were responsible for enabling life to undertake this transition.

"There's no doubt that probably a lot of metal was locked up in the oceans," said John Parnell, a geologist from the University of Aberdeen, in the U.K. "[We're] suggesting that it's the where the metal was really being made newly available."

Parnell brought together several pieces of evidence to show that granites formed, came to the surface of continents, then weathered. freed up metals, he said, which traveled with runoff to fill lakes and shallow seas, places where could incorporate the metals and become more complex.

"We propose that metals were delivered due to a critical combination of continental growth, near-surface concentration, and erosion into the surface environment during the Mesoproterozoic [a time period from roughly 1.6-1.0 billion years ago]," Parnell and his colleagues wrote in their paper, published this month in Geology.

Life originated more than 3.5 billion years ago, as basic prokaryotic cells, which did not have a nucleus. Advanced cells -- called eukaryotes -- added a nucleus. They evolved around 2 billion years ago. Then, sometime between 2 billion and 1 billion years ago, these cells proliferated, sexual reproduction evolved, and the first multicellular organisms developed.

Parnell said that he brought together two areas of research to form this conclusion.. The first was from scientists who identified that critical advances in life lined up with increased access to metals about 1.5 to 2 billion years ago. A second group had shown that granites bearing many of these same metals formed at about the same time.

"Nobody had thought about it in this way before," said Parnell.

"It's really interesting and intriguing," said Ariel Anbar, a geologist at Arizona State University in Tempe. "A lot of us in the community have noted loosely that there's this correlation and we've wondered if there's something to it."

Anbar also called the article "thought-provoking." He suggested that the increased availability of oxygen in the environment may have been more responsible for life's increasing complexity.

However, Anbar also added that complex processes can have several contributing factors.

"I think we should all be cautious about saying, 'Oh, this one factor was the key,'" said Anbar. "There are probably multiple factors."

Regardless of the root cause that made new elements available to ancient life, metals such copper, molybdenum, and zinc remain important.

"Many people will know that we have plenty of iron in our body, and you can see that in the red color in our blood," said Parnell. "We have just as much zinc in our bodies as we have iron."

Explore further: New, tighter timeline confirms ancient volcanism aligned with dinosaurs' extinction

More information: Research paper: geology.gsapubs.org/content/ea… 07/G33116.1.abstract

Journal reference: Geology search and more info website

Source: Inside Science News Service

4.8 /5 (10 votes)

Related Stories

A birthplace for primitive life on Earth?

Oct 24, 2011

The mud volcanoes at Isua, in south-west Greenland, have been identified as a possible birthplace for life on Earth by an international team headed by researchers from the Laboratoire de Géologie de Lyon: ...

Recommended for you

Improving forecasts for rain-on-snow flooding

4 hours ago

Many of the worst West Coast winter floods pack a double punch. Heavy rains and melting snow wash down the mountains together to breach riverbanks, wash out roads and flood buildings.

The Greenland Ice Sheet: Now in HD

5 hours ago

The Greenland Ice Sheet is ready for its close-up. The highest-resolution satellite images ever taken of that region are making their debut. And while each individual pixel represents only one moment in time, ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
1 / 5 (1) Jun 21, 2012
I think Anbar's take is reasonable. Even with more availability, we can't say if elements are critical just from that.

Instead, Parnell's research is partly contradicted by modern whole genome phylogenies. Zinc has always been much utilized by cells, starting as 1/4th of the genes using transition metals and later decreased to 1/5th as for example genes for copper and molybdenum ramps up in number. ["Rapid evolutionary innovation during an Archaean genetic expansion", David et al, Nature 2010]

The overall idea of studying the coupling between geosphere and biosphere is a good one, originating with Hazen I believe.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.