Archaeologist finds first evidence of cult in Judah at time of King David

May 11, 2012
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem’s Prof. Yosef Garfinkel with a stone shrine model found at Khirbet Qeiyafa (Credit: Hebrew University of Jerusalem)

Prof. Yosef Garfinkel, the Yigal Yadin Professor of Archaeology at the Institute of Archaeology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, announced today the discovery of objects that for the first time shed light on how a cult was organized in Judah at the time of King David. During recent archaeological excavations at Khirbet Qeiyafa, a fortified city in Judah adjacent to the Valley of Elah, Garfinkel and colleagues uncovered rich assemblages of pottery, stone and metal tools, and many art and cult objects. These include three large rooms that served as cultic shrines, which in their architecture and finds correspond to the biblical description of a cult at the time of King David.

This is extraordinary as it is the first time that shrines from the time of early biblical kings were uncovered. Because these shrines pre-date the construction of Solomon’s temple in Jerusalem by 30 to 40 years, they provide the first physical evidence of a cult in the time of King David, with significant implications for the fields of , history, biblical and religion studies.

The expedition to Khirbet Qeiyafa has excavated the site for six weeks each summer since 2007, with co-director Saar Ganor of the Israel Antiquities Authority. The revolutionary results of five years of work are presented today in a new book, Footsteps of King David in the Valley of Elah, published by Yedioth Ahronoth.
 
Located approximately 30 km southwest of Jerusalem in the valley of Elah, Khirbet Qeiyafa was a border city of the Kingdom of Judah opposite the Philistine city of Gath. The city, which was dated by 10 radiometric measurements (14C) done at Oxford University on burned olive pits, existed for a short period of time between ca. 1020 to 980 BCE, and was violently destroyed.

The biblical tradition presents the people of Israel as conducting a cult different from all other nations of the ancient Near East by being monotheistic and an-iconic (banning human or animal figures). However, it is not clear when these practices were formulated, if indeed during the time of the monarchy (10-6th centuries BC), or only later, in the Persian or Hellenistic eras.

The absence of cultic images of humans or animals in the three shrines provides evidence that the inhabitants of the place practiced a different cult than that of the Canaanites or the Philistines, observing a ban on graven images.

The findings at Khirbet Qeiyafa also indicate that an elaborate architectural style had developed as early as the time of King David. Such construction is typical of royal activities, thus indicating that state formation, the establishment of an elite, social level and urbanism in the region existed in the days of the early kings of Israel. These finds strengthen the historicity of the biblical tradition and its architectural description of the Palace and Temple of Solomon.

According to Prof. Garfinkel, “This is the first time that archaeologists uncovered a fortified city in Judah from the time of King David. Even in Jerusalem we do not have a clear fortified city from his period. Thus, various suggestions that completely deny the biblical tradition regarding King David and argue that he was a mythological figure, or just a leader of a small tribe, are now shown to be wrong.” Garfinkel continued, “Over the years, thousands of animal bones were found, including sheep, goats and cattle, but no pigs. Now we uncovered three cultic rooms, with various cultic paraphernalia, but not even one human or animal figurine was found. This suggests that the population of Khirbet Qeiyafa observed two biblical bans—on pork and on graven images—and thus practiced a different cult than that of the Canaanites or the Philistines.”  

The three shrines are part of larger building complexes. In this respect they are different from Canaanite or Philistine cults, which were practiced in temples—separate buildings dedicated only to rituals. The biblical tradition described this phenomenon in the time of King David: “He brought the ark of God from a private house in Kyriat Yearim and put it in Jerusalem in a private house” (2 Samuel 6).

The cult objects include five standing stones (Massebot), two basalt altars, two pottery libation vessels and two portable shrines. No human or animal figurines were found, suggesting the people of Khirbet Qeiyafa observed the biblical ban on graven images.

Two portable shrines (or “shrine models”) were found, one made of pottery (ca. 20 cm high) and the other of stone (35 cm high). These are boxes in the shape of temples, and could be closed by doors.

The clay shrine is decorated with an elaborate façade, including two guardian lions, two pillars, a main door, beams of the roof, folded textile and three birds standing on the roof. Two of these elements are described in Solomon’s Temple: the two pillars (Yachin and Boaz) and the textile (Parochet).

The stone shrine is made of soft limestone and painted red. Its façade is decorated by two elements. The first are seven groups of roof-beams, three planks in each. This architectural element, the "triglyph," is known in Greek classical temples, like the Parthenon in Athens. Its appearance at Khirbet Qeiyafa is the earliest known example carved in stone, a landmark in world .

The second decorative element is the recessed door. This type of doors or windows is known in the architecture of temples, palaces and royal graves in the ancient Near East. This was a typical symbol of divinity and royalty at the time.

The stone model helps us to understand obscure technical terms in the description of Solomon’s palace as described in 1 Kings 7, 1-6. The text uses the term “Slaot,” which were mistakenly understood as pillars and can now be understood as triglyphs. The text also uses the term “Sequfim”, which was usually understood as nine windows in the palace, and can now be understood as "triple recessed doorway.” 

Similar triglyphs and recessed doors can be found in the description of Solomon’s temple (1 Kings 6, Verses 5, 31-33, and in the description of a temple by the prophet Ezekiel (41:6). These biblical texts are replete with obscure technical terms that have lost their original meaning over the millennia. Now, with the help of the stone model uncovered at Khirbet Qeiyafa, the biblical text is clarified. For the first time in history we have actual objects from the time of David, which can be related to monuments described in the Bible.

Explore further: Divers sure of new finds from 'ancient computer' shipwreck

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Khirbet Qeiyafa identified as biblical 'Neta'im'

Mar 08, 2010

Has another mystery in the history of Israel been solved? Prof. Gershon Galil of the Department of Bible Studies at the University of Haifa has identified Khirbet Qeiyafa as "Neta'im", which is mentioned in the book of Chronicles. ...

Most ancient Hebrew biblical inscription deciphered

Jan 07, 2010

Professor Gershon Galil of the department of biblical studies at the University of Haifa has deciphered an inscription dating from the 10th century BCE (the period of King David's reign), and has shown that ...

Digging biblical history, or the end of the world

Nov 20, 2007

Some come to dig the Tel Aviv University-directed archeological site at Tel Megiddo because they are enchanted by ancient stories of King Solomon. Others come because they believe in a New Testament prophecy ...

Recommended for you

NOAA team reveals forgotten ghost ships off Golden Gate

1 hour ago

A team of NOAA researchers today confirmed the discovery just outside San Francisco's Golden Gate strait of the 1910 shipwreck SS Selja and an unidentified early steam tugboat wreck tagged the "mystery wreck." ...

Long lost Roman fort discovered in Gernsheim

2 hours ago

In the course of an educational dig in Gernsheim in the Hessian Ried, archaeologists from Frankfurt University have discovered a long lost Roman fort: A troop unit made up out of approximately 500 soldiers ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Lurker2358
3.7 / 5 (6) May 11, 2012
I'd like to point out the obvious technicality that the Bible does NOT forbid the Israelis from making engraved images, art, or figurines, except for the purpose of worshiping, i.e. "bowing down to," those things as gods or symbols of gods.

In fact, the Ark of the Covenant and the Holy Place in the Temple had enormous gold plated statues of Cherubim creatures, and there were embroidered Cherubims on the veil of the tabernacle and the holy place in the Temple, as well as bronze oxen supporting the brazen "sea" (bath) in the accompanying chambers of the Temple complex.

Therefore, it's a bit of a fallacy to assume that no figurines, statues, or "images" would be found in an orthodox temple of David's time.

Also, technically, they were not supposed to make sacrifices anywhere other than the temple complex, but if they made an altar that was symbolic of the original temple, that was apparently allowed, just so long as they didn't actually use the replica for sacrifices or worship.
Lurker2358
3 / 5 (4) May 11, 2012
I'm not at all surprised if something has been "lost" or mis-tranlated into modern English or even modern Hebrew descriptions of the Temple complex, as we know the subtleties of languages can cause minor and even sometimes serious mis-communication across languages. So the concepts of certain pillar structures or recessed doorways could easily be misrepresented when translating from an ancient, less developed language to a modern language.

I wonder what the deniers will say now that a replica of a similar monument, probably used for construction plans for less educated people, has been found?

Lurker2358
3 / 5 (4) May 11, 2012
Oh yeah, not to mention, the Heliopolis was constructed using the exact same technique described in the Bible for the Temple, and also uses stones that are exactly the same size in two dimensions.

Since Solomon later went sort of crazy and started worshiping everything, it's likely Solomon also built the Heliopolis, though getting anyone to admit that will be a stretch. The humanists wouldn't want to admit a connection because it would authenticate the Bible. The Jews wouldn't want to admit a connection, because it would be a cultural embarrassment, even though it would also authenticate the Bible.

Additionally, during the time of Ezekiel, a few hundred years after Solomon, the Sun Cult (probably associated at Heliopolis,) infiltrated the Temple priesthood and corrupted it, over a few generations, which was a big part of what the book of Ezekiel was about; God destroyed the original temple and the original nation of Israel through the nation of Babylon.
Sean_W
3.7 / 5 (3) May 11, 2012
Therefore, it's a bit of a fallacy to assume that no figurines, statues, or "images" would be found in an orthodox temple of David's time.


The absence of these images may not be necessary but it is telling since other cultures in the area would almost certainly have such images present.
Lurker2358
3 / 5 (2) May 11, 2012
The absence of these images may not be necessary but it is telling since other cultures in the area would almost certainly have such images present.


True. The issue was never about artwork, but "idolatry".

However, what is "supposed to be" in the temple is described in the Bible in very great detail. Some of the most detailed writings in the Bible concern the floor plans, ornaments, and furnishings of the Temple, as well as the ordering of the ceremonial sacrifices, worship, the priests' Ephod, and so on.

Unfortunately, there may be other issues to resolve, because the Sun cult and some other cults that infiltrated the priesthood in fact did bring in idols into the temple on several occasions. There may be a way to distinguish this from the true implements of the temple, if any of them remain, based on things like the surviving descriptions, as well as the style of the artist, and possibly dating methods to distinguish original artifacts from the corrupt priests additions.
theskepticalpsychic
3.7 / 5 (3) May 11, 2012
A fascinating discovery. But how does it prove the historical existence of King David? And why do the researchers say they found no representations of animals, when lions and birds are carved on the "altars"?
Lurker2358
2.3 / 5 (3) May 12, 2012
A fascinating discovery. But how does it prove the historical existence of King David? And why do the researchers say they found no representations of animals, when lions and birds are carved on the "altars"?


According to the Bible, the original temple was actually sacked, plundered, and destroyed by the Babylonians, with the silver and gold "vessels" and artifacts taken into the Babylonian treasury. It's highly unlikely that you'd ever find anything more than a handful of the original artifacts from Solomons' temple.

What you might find is the foundation, or historical references through other artifacts, replicas, extra-biblical written accounts, etc.
E-dward
5 / 5 (1) May 13, 2012
Compare this to the cult of "God Enlil of Nippur" -the God of the air , the storms , and everything that has breath- from the sumerian city of Nippur ,close to the ancient Babylonia - Ur , city of the patriarchs , was also a sumerian city .