Stellar winds

Oct 10, 2011
An image of the Sun's hot outer atmosphere, taken in ultraviolet light by SAO's Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) instrument on NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory. The image shows how a star's magnetic field, traced by the uv light, stretches up from its surface to fill the surrounding space with outflowing, hot plasma. Credit: NASA and SDO

(PhysOrg.com) -- The Sun, glowing with a surface temperature of about 5500 degrees Celsius, warms the Earth with its salutary light. Meanwhile the Sun's hot outer layer (the corona), with its temperature of over a million degrees, ejects a wind of charged particles at a rate equivalent to about one-millionth of the moon's mass each year. Some particles bombard the Earth, producing radio static, auroral glows, and (in extreme cases) disrupted global communications. Astronomers can only partially explain two longstanding, related questions: how is the corona heated to temperatures so much hotter than the surface? And how does the corona produce the wind? The answers to both involve turbulence in the Sun's atmosphere, and magnetic fields.

The Sun is not unique. All stars, including those more massive than the Sun and those less massive, are believed to have at some level. Stellar has a significant impact on the evolution of the stars, on any surrounding (they are bombarded by the particles), and on the evolution of gas and dust in galaxies. The Sun’s mass loss, for example, was probably an important factor in the early erosion of atmospheres from the inner planets of the young solar system. Unfortunately, the winds of other stars are even more poorly understood than the Sun's, to the extent that astronomers cannot even predict a star's mass loss rate.

CfA astronomers Steven Cranmer and Steven Saar have specialized in the study of stellar winds for many years. In a new paper forthcoming in the Astrophysical Journal, they present a new, self-consistent model of stellar winds that succeeds for the first time in reproducing a wide range of observations. Based on an extension of models of the Sun's wind, the new theory can now be incorporated into a wide range of other research on stars to understand more accurately and precisely how stars evolve, and how they influence their environments.

Explore further: First potentially habitable Earth-sized planet confirmed: It may have liquid water

Related Stories

Neon study resolves sun dilemma

Aug 01, 2005

A new survey of the sun's neighboring stars suggests there is nearly three times more neon in the sun than previously believed, thus solving a theoretical conundrum about the way the sun transfers heat and ...

X-Ray Emission from Young Stars

Feb 05, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- The star TW Hydrae is located about 150 light-years from earth in the direction of the constellation of Hydrae, the Water Snake. This star is relatively young -- at about 10 million years ...

Planets Living on the Edge

Dec 17, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- Some stars have it tough when it comes to raising planets. A new image from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope shows one unlucky lot of stars, born into a dangerous neighborhood. The stars themselves ...

An abundance of small stars

Dec 10, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Stars form from giant clouds of gas and dust in space, as the matter in these clouds comes together under the influence of gravity.

Recommended for you

Continents may be a key feature of Super-Earths

3 hours ago

Huge Earth-like planets that have both continents and oceans may be better at harboring extraterrestrial life than those that are water-only worlds. A new study gives hope for the possibility that many super-Earth ...

Exoplanets soon to gleam in the eye of NESSI

6 hours ago

(Phys.org) —The New Mexico Exoplanet Spectroscopic Survey Instrument (NESSI) will soon get its first "taste" of exoplanets, helping astronomers decipher their chemical composition. Exoplanets are planets ...

A sharp eye on Southern binary stars

Apr 17, 2014

Unlike our sun, with its retinue of orbiting planets, many stars in the sky orbit around a second star. These binary stars, with orbital periods ranging from days to centuries, have long been the primary ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

omatranter
3.3 / 5 (12) Oct 10, 2011
Thank you for this wonderfully short article almost totally lacking in any content.

"Astronomers can only partially explain two longstanding, related questions:"
Because they do not appreciate the ability of Repulsive Neutrons

I would like to offer my adouring audience a limited one time offer, buy into Repulsive Neutron Theory and you will receive free of charge a set of other theories like:
Dunce-AEther-Wobbly-Nonscience Theory-
I came to an appreciation of DAWNT watching the ripples in my bathwater after a particularly voluminous and wretched fart. These ripples underwent a series of constructive and destructive resonani, which along with the mind altering nature of my digestive gases allowed me to see deeply into the coming Singularity that will be powered by Repellent-Neutronium. cont.
omatwankr
3.5 / 5 (11) Oct 10, 2011
The Eclectic Universe
By borrowing images from all over the web of pretty astronomical things and staring at them long enough you will see "Thunderturds everywhere" just like only a blessed few can see "Jesus on Mars"
http://www.telegr...ars.html
It takes little effort and a lot of squinting, like that other hobby that sends you blind.

But wait theirs more!
You will also receive, free, a set of 6 priceless Free-energy/perpetual motion machines, amaze your friends (not provided) with you endless perpetual gullibility.

What has this to do with the article?

Mighty Omatranter
"Here I come to save the day"
That means that Repulsive Neutrons are on there way.
Yes sir, when there is a wrong to right
omatranter will join the fight.
On the sea or on the land,
He gets the situation well in hand.
sjw40364
1 / 5 (1) Oct 10, 2011
Funny how magnatism always goes hand-in-hand with electricity, but they never seem to mention that part.
Ethelred
3.7 / 5 (3) Oct 11, 2011
They mentioned it.

ejects a wind of charged particles
That IS a charged current.

Ethelred
omatumr
1.6 / 5 (7) Oct 12, 2011
Thanks for the story.

Earth is continuously bathed by the solar wind, a fact that seems to have been overlooked by world leaders and their climatology followers.

I regret that information like this was not more available when the USA still had a viable space program.

Again, thanks for the reminder of our dependence on the Sun.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
jsdarkdestruction
1 / 5 (2) Oct 12, 2011
Oliver, do you not know of phase 2 of the plan? see kissinger and nixon knew about neutron repulsion and it being the main source of the suns and the universes power but chairman mao did not. as the world all followed their lead in the conspiracy they said it was to prevent nuclear war. however under the guise of that the united states had different reasons. as the climatoligists/scientists destroy our economy and power while funneling money to third world nations for supportung the scam the chinese will soon grow too strong and overpopulated for anyone but the us to even have a chance of stopping the chinese from taking over the world, at that moment neutron repulsion will be officially "discovered" and cheap easy neutron repulsion energy will be used both to power production of weapons and supplies and as weapons of mass destruction themselves in neutron repulsion bombs. saving the united states and allowing us to finally take over the whole world without looking like the bad guys...
Ethelred
3 / 5 (2) Oct 12, 2011
Earth is continuously bathed by the solar wind, a fact that seems to have been overlooked by world leaders and their climatology followers.
Oliver, that is the usual bullshit. The SCIENTIST came up with the EVIDENCE for global warming. Real or not Global Warming is NOT some insane conspiracy by multiple Presidents in combination with the Chinese. That is some utter crap you made yourself. You even posted link to a letter that was supposed to support you. It did no such thing. Not even a hint one. You can't even explain why you did that.

So just how do Neutron Stars form when neutron repulsion is alleged by you to be so powerful that it stops Black Holes from forming no matter how large the mass?

Ignoring the question won't magically make you right Oliver. The ideas are contradictory and I bet even the Plasma Universe Cranks can see that now that it has been pointed out.

Join The Cause. Force Physorg To Enforce Their Own Rules On Oliver.

COUNTER SPAM OLIVER NOW.

Ethelred

More news stories

Sun emits a mid-level solar flare

The sun emitted a mid-level solar flare, peaking at 9:03 a.m. EDT on April 18, 2014, and NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory captured images of the event. Solar flares are powerful bursts of radiation. Harmful ...

Impact glass stores biodata for millions of years

(Phys.org) —Bits of plant life encapsulated in molten glass by asteroid and comet impacts millions of years ago give geologists information about climate and life forms on the ancient Earth. Scientists ...

Continents may be a key feature of Super-Earths

Huge Earth-like planets that have both continents and oceans may be better at harboring extraterrestrial life than those that are water-only worlds. A new study gives hope for the possibility that many super-Earth ...

LinkedIn membership hits 300 million

The career-focused social network LinkedIn announced Friday it has 300 million members, with more than half the total outside the United States.

Magnitude-7.2 earthquake shakes Mexican capital

A powerful magnitude-7.2 earthquake shook central and southern Mexico on Friday, sending panicked people into the streets. Some walls cracked and fell, but there were no reports of major damage or casualties.

Plants with dormant seeds give rise to more species

Seeds that sprout as soon as they're planted may be good news for a garden. But wild plants need to be more careful. In the wild, a plant whose seeds sprouted at the first warm spell or rainy day would risk disaster. More ...