Squeezed laser will bring gravitational waves to the light of day
The new squeezed light laser of GEO600. A highly complex laser system produces light which particularly quiet in the gravitational wave detector. Credit: © Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Hannover)
A quantum phenomenon allows detectors which sense oscillations of space-time to measure with 50 percent more accuracy.
Measuring at the limits of the laws of nature this is the challenge which researchers repeatedly take up in their search for gravitational waves. The interferometers they use here measure with such sensitivity that a particular quantum phenomenon of light shot noise limits the measuring accuracy. With the "squeezed light" method scientists from the Max Planck Society and the Leibniz University Hannover likewise use quantum physics in a countermove in order to remove the interfering effect. The new type of laser light improves the measuring accuracy of the gravitational wave detector GEO600 by around 50 percent and thus increases its effective sensitivity. This is the first time this technology has been used outside of a test laboratory anywhere in the world. The results will be published in the specialist journal Nature Physics, online on September 11, 2011.
Some 50 years after the development of the first lasers, the technology of "squeezed light" can be used to generate a completely new quality of laser light. The light from a squeezed laser radiates much more calmly than light from a conventional laser source. "Thanks to the squeezed laser, we were able to increase the measuring sensitivity of GEO600 to 150%," says Hartmut Grote, who heads the detector operation. "The new light source fulfils all requirements as expected." In future, this technology could be used to even double the measuring accuracy. In the search for the almost undetectable gravitational waves, this increase in sensitivity is an important step to their direct detection.
The GEO600 experiment at the QUEST (Center for Quantum Engineering and Space-Time Research) Cluster of Excellence is part of the international LIGO Virgo Collaboration (LVCon) and is putting the researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Sub-Institute Hanover, Albert Einstein Institute/AEI) and from the Institute for Gravitational Physics at the Leibniz University Hannover on the track of gravitational waves. Einstein predicted these oscillations in space-time around a hundred years ago in his General Theory of Relativity. They arise during turbulent cosmic events such as supernova explosions, for example.
Gravitational waves are scarcely noticeable on Earth, however. One reason is that the interaction between matter and space is very weak. Changes to the structure of space-time which occur in our immediate astronomical vicinity as a result of the movements of relatively low-mass objects, such as moons or planets, are way below what is measurable. Turbulent supernova explosions which violently shake space-time occur at a great distance, in contrast. The gravitational waves generated in the process are considerably attenuated when they reach Earth. The relative measuring path in a gravitational wave detector would change by only around a thousandth of a proton diameter if a supernova occurred within our Milky Way. With GEO600, the scientists are meanwhile able to measure such differences in length.
ANU researchers carrying out a related gravity wave experiment
Laser light with constant intensityIn order to be able to make such accurate measurements, the physicists must rely on metrology techniques that are as free from interferences as possible. One of the effects which has caused interference so far is the so-called shot noise. Their quantum nature means the photons rain down at irregular intervals onto the photodiode in the detector. This is evident in the signal as fluctuating background brightness. An oscillation of space-time which causes a similarly weak change in the brightness like the shot noise, can thus only be recognised with difficulty.
Roman Schnabel and his research group in Hannover have now developed a special light source with which the disturbing shot noise can be curbed. When integrated into GEO600, the squeezed light laser assists the gravitational wave detector to a new measuring sensitivity. This makes the GEO600 the first detector whose signal beam is smoothed with the new type of laser light.
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that the intensity and colour of a laser beam cannot simultaneously be defined with arbitrary accuracy. For example, the more exact the intensity (to be more precise: the amplitude) is specified, the more uncertain the colour becomes (to be more precise: the phase). The quantum physicists utilise this effect to minimise the shot noise in the GEO600 experiment. After all, the shot noise is actually nothing more than an uncertainty of the laser intensity. They improve the laser light so that its intensity is very accurately defined, i.e. exhibits almost no fluctuations. The experts also call this process "squeezing". In this experiment, it is of no consequence that the light colour becomes more imprecise, i.e. slightly more "colourful", since this parameter is not included in the measurement data.
"We now feed the squeezed light into the interferometer, in addition to our normal laser light," explains Schnabel. "If the two light fields then superimpose, the resulting laser beam has a much more uniform intensity, compared to the original signal beam. "We thus smooth out the irregularities caused by quantum physical effects in the detector signal," Schnabel continues.
The squeezed light laser has been undergoing a longer test phase since April last year at GEO600 and is now being used in the search for gravitational waves. The application of squeezed light technology has thus passed the acid test. The American colleagues within the LVC plan to soon test a squeezed laser on the LIGO detectors.
More information: Paper online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NPHYS2083
Provided by
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Calculating Saturation Vapor Pressure?
3 hours ago
-
Question about high electric charge.
8 hours ago
-
eyeglasses with smallest chromatic abberation
11 hours ago
-
Linear momentum converted to angular momentum?!
11 hours ago
-
Physics laboratory project - bumpers/crash tests
12 hours ago
-
How to open a winebottle with a shoe
12 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - Classical Physics
More news stories
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (22) |
51
|
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
16
|
Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots
(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of robots as a laser ...
Sound increases the efficiency of boiling
Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...
May 24, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Almost half of new vets seek disability
(AP) -- America's newest veterans are filing for disability benefits at a historic rate, claiming to be the most medically and mentally troubled generation of former troops the nation has ever seen.

Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (6)
or anywhere else for that matter - gravitational waves have not been detected.
I wonder how much this method weighs/sizes compared to normal lasers. I.e. would it be possible to adapt for LISA?
Also... the phrase "squeezed light" reminded me of Brasseye's "heavy electricity". :)
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (7)
Relativists use a simplified form of Einstein field equations to calculate various properties of his gravitational field, including Einstein gravitational waves, which are based on the Einstein's pseudo-tensor. This simplified form is called the linearised field equations. They do this because Einstein's field equations are highly non-linear (implicit actually) and impossible to solve analytically. So they use the linearized form, simply assuming that they can do so. However Hermann Weyl proved in 1944 already, that linearization of the field equations implies the existence of a Einstein's pseudo-tensor that doesn't otherwise exist.
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
The same question can be put about light waves..;-)
But at the case of gravitational waves the conceptual problem of their definition rather is, the gravitational wave is formed with curvature of space-time and the position of artifacts in general relativity is defined only with respect to curvature of space-time (the flat space-time poses no reference frame for definition of location). In such way the position of gravitational wave is defined it's own position, which leads into circular reasoning of its existence.
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Non-physical? Maybe it's just invisible. Sort of like clean air.
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Put it in a microwave and I guess it heats it up.
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
If the parameters are tested for one, data accumulated over time; then the parameters for another tested, comparative data accumulated over time; then perhaps a method of simultaneous detection, might actuate? how uncertain can it remain in the face of continuous testing?
a color test;
For instance DM's property of high energy particle physics? -- a potential shift? a distorted spacetime moment? phase waves to what precise comparative/expectation?
--. .-. --- ..- -. -.. ... ??????
if we do not give space the time, can you give it to zero space?
-.-- . ... ?????
graphically - can such intensity translate to real space?
at what color?
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Groundless? except you left off the last ...
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
clean air? that's something a lot of younger people have never experienced. i know its been a while for me.
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Yea I'm pretty old too. Think of it as an abstract concept.
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
-. --- ?????
for an isolated single point, how do you graphically represent that as a closed system without zero?
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (8)
The last thing to get sucked up into a black hole after they eat up all matter and space-time in the universe is the anti-matter lurking in the far reaches of the universe. Best hope you're in heaven by then because that's when it's deja vu all over again.
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Right. The big bang is just part of life, one of the phases nature goes through, not the beginning. There is/was no beginning. There is no end. It's just over and over again. At least as long as 2 2=4. Infinite. Deja vu all over again.
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Flood control? Quick. Let's try that again. 2 plus 2 equals 4.
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
It only means that both may seem equally clear to you. But in this case you are right on one and wrong on the other.
Stuff may be big. But 'infinite' isn't on the menu. neither for space, time or whatever else you can measure. (Because for there to be something to measure you need to discriminate betwen things and that already means a finite measure/value set)
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Try that on measuring pi.
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
..thanks...nevermind, I looked it up, the answer is yes.
*pats self on head*
http://en.wikiped...pressure
http://en.wikiped...reaction
Fascinating
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
My point exactly: PI is an abstract. There is no perfect circle anywhere in the universe (since that would require infinite matter and/or something that is not quantized or falls under an uncertainty principle on any level. )
You cannot 'measure' PI to the last digit. Any real application that we would call a circle has a finite value for PI. Only in the abstract/mathematical sense of circles does PI have a truly infinite number of digits.
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (3)
Right except there is no last digit. However I feel certain that the universe has been around for a time equal to the total number of digits.
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Right. And remember the number of digits goes up by one every year.
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
That's why I said PI was an abstract.
Take any real circular entity and measure PI for it. You will find that it is impossible because at the atomic level you run into granularity (and a measure of PI demands a continuously differntiable curve). Further down you run into Heisenberg Uncertainty where you can't even measure exact locations/lengths anymore.
So PI - while beeing an exceedingly helpful abstract notion - does not have a perfect representation in the real word.
And that number, too, is finite (and always will remain so).
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
So what would that number be?
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Since time is a measurement of entropic increase we will (according to current cosmological models) get to a point where the universe reaches maximum entropy (heat death of the universe - the time when the final black hole will have evaporated).
At that point all we will have left are vacuum fluctuations - so the total entropy state will fluctuate around this final value. A measure of time is then impossible since the arrow of time becomes indefinite (i.e. looking at 'snapshots' of two states of the universe it is then impossible to say which one is before the other one)
Depending on which source you go to we get the rather large spread of between 10 to the 77 power and 10 to the 126 power years (which is an enormous span - but by no means infinite).
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Yes, assuming black holes will be around that long. However recent observations of the CMB reveal circular patterns suggesting to Roger Penrose a collapse of of the universe before the big bang. Sounds better than heat death anyway.
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
To get a recollapse we need an ultra long range force (i.e. one that is even longer range than gravity) which is somehow being suppressed until now and can overcome this accelerated phase. Such a force would need to go into effect before the Big Rip and also be instantaneous (i.e. transmitted at faster than light speeds). Those are some pretty big problems. We have as yet no indication that such a force exists.
As for the circular patterns in the CMB - that one is still on shaky ground as the fluctuations in the CMB are so incredibly minute. (and even if: it could have all kinds of other explanations besides a big bounce - we'll have to wait until the new sky survey finishes to get a final verdict on that one)
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Seems to be a natural effect of an expanding volume. I have showed at
https://skydrive....D%215333
that as the increase in radius decreases by 10 percent the increase in volume increases in the early stages of expansion (sheet 1), indicating we are in the early stages of expansion.
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
How non physical space could be curved?
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Maybe it's physical.
Sep 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
For time, we'd have to discuss its meaning first. Equating time with entropy is just the most fashionable of several possible philosophical interpretations of our perception of a physical phenomenon. Another one, better fit to cope with observations than the Christian biased idea of time's alpha and omega, is indeed the notion of a time without beginning and ending.
The absence of beginning end ending of time is simpler in the sense of Occam's razor and thus preferable. Calling a time without beginning and ending "infinite" is quite reasonable.
Sep 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
That's just a definition without any rationale to back it up - thus Occam's Razor doesn't apply.
I think you ned to check your numbers. you're not using an increasing inflation rate (which is what we measure) but a decreaseing inflation rate. And even in your faulty model there is only a decrease in the expansion RATE - but never a recollapse.
Sep 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Any physical object called a "circle" is only an abstraction of a mathematical circle which is - by definition - perfect.
There's no need to measure PI as it's exact by definition. But its (approximizing) representation by a finite number of (decimal or other) digits can be calculated.
PI always has a finite value.
Representations are not qualities inherent to numbers. PI would be represented best by its Greek symbol, as in its defining equation: cos(PI/2) = 0.
Sep 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Annotation:
While most people view the number PI from a (historically primed) geometrical PoV, the mathematically more important PoV is the analytical one via the Taylor series of the cosine with argument PI/2.
Sep 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
So? The argument goes for all transcendental numbers. None of these have a perfect representation in reality. They only exist as 'absolutes' in the abstract context of mathematics.
Whether you represent them in a symbol or as a string of numbers doesn't matter.
The point is that infinity is an abstract notion and not a property of reality. Just like green purple or dark light (or 'god' if you will) are abstract notions but occur nowhere in reality. Putting words to a concept doesn't make it real.
Sep 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Occam's razor is applicable wherever two different scientific explanations work equally well in describing the same physical phenomenon.
All present cosmological models based on the concept of a mystical "boundary point zero" for the universe fall short of providing a non-mystical rationale for this concept.
Sep 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Check column E sheet 1.
Sep 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
That's not the nature of an expanding volume which is what I'm talking about. Once the expansion slows down there are various collapse scenarios.
Sep 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Maybe for space but not time.
Sep 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Actually if there was one and you had it in your lab you never could prove it was perfect.
Sep 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
You may be sitting right in the midst of it and never now it. Watch out for conventional wisdom. Yes this universe is finite in space but there's lots more room for other universes out there. There are no walls or borders that I'm aware of.
Sep 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Dark light? Both at the same time?
I thought green or purple could be described by some wavelengh of light. Not really that abstract.
I wonder if god were around would he have an id card? How would you know? Maybe you could ask him for a business card. Conventional wisdom would seem to be never count out the god option.
Sep 14, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Since we're dealing, at least since Einstein, with spacetime I don't see how you can argue for a finite space and a separately infinite time. The two aren't independent.
Sep 14, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I meant finite space only for the observable universe. Other universes would have to be separated from observation or causality by no connecting spacetime to communicate light or gravity.
Sep 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
That would be pretty long, as least per Newton: the force is greater than zero as long as the distance between two masses is finite.
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
If you go for cyclic universes then you still have to find a point at which the cycling started.
If you do not want to define such a point then you have just refused causality (which makes any argument about inifnities moot because without that would make any type of sequencing irrelevant)
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Easy. It started as soon as 2 plus 2 equals 4.
Sep 17, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Sep 17, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
A universe without starting point is not violating causality as it has no cause and needs no cause. It just is existing. The assumption of it's non-existence is metaphysical only.
I don't understand this. But as we can measure time intervals at most from one collision of branes (aka BigBang) to the next one, it wouldn't matter.
Sep 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Interesting. So falsifiable would mean scientific. Something to think about.
Sep 17, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Reminds me of one of the creeds - "begotten, not made, being of one substance with the father", or something like that.
Sep 17, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
"only universe" would seem a bit speculative also. Maybe also a bit presumptuous.
Sep 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
By definition, the universe comprises the totality of directly and indirectly measurable physical objects.
Scientists are humble and modest by limiting the scope of their work to objects that are - at least in principle - accessible by observation.
Anything beyond that scope, in particular objects that - in principle - cannot be observed is considered not to be accessible to physical reasoning.
It would be unmodest and presumptuous to lend the same weight of meaning and certainty to principally unaccessible objects and their unfalsifiable embedding theories as to physical objects that are modelled by falsifiable, i.e. scientific, theories.
Abandoning of speculation increases the certainty of knowledge. That's what science is about.
Sep 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Maybe you should read the definition of scientific theory before trying to make statements about it?
From the wikipedia link on "scientific theory":
"The defining characteristic of a scientific theory is that it makes falsifiable or testable predictions."
http://en.wikiped...criteria
Sep 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
..."The defining characteristic of a scientific theory is that it makes falsifiable or testable predictions."
You'd think you could work in a little common sense in there somewhere.
Sep 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Science vs. Metaphysical.
Predictions come and go.
Science records this.
Sep 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Where would have common sense gotten us with quantum physics? Quantum physics is real, but 'common sense' would have rejected the notion that stuff can be everywhere at once (and did for a long time).
Similarly relativity: Common sense would tell us the path of massive objects is bent - but relativity shows that it's straight - only space is warped.
Science doesn't need to conform to what you think common sense should be. It is confined to what works.
Sep 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Sep 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
http://conservape...lativity
My question rather is, which evidence should happen for physicists to stop invest billions of dollars into search of gravitational waves.
http://physicswor...1a19.pdf
http://physicswor...ws/46027
BTW The sqeezed light is used from 2008 year in GW detectors. It's not new feature, as this propaganda implies - but no GW were found yet with it or without it
http://physicswor...ws/33755
Sep 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
You mean like observations of the Hulse-Taylor binary system?
http://en.wikiped...r_binary
Sep 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Of course. I should have included imagination, creativity, and initiative.