GRAIL and the mystery of the missing moon

September 7, 2011 By Dauna Coulter

GRAIL and the mystery of the missing moon

The "Big Splat." Four snapshots from a computer simulation of a collision between the Moon and a smaller companion show how the splattered companion moon forms a mountainous region on one side of the Moon. Credit: M. Jutzi and E. Asphaug, Nature.

(PhysOrg.com) -- As early as Sept. 8th, NASA's GRAIL mission will blast off to uncover some of the mysteries beneath the surface of the Moon. That cratered gray exterior hides some tantalizing things – even, perhaps, a long-lost companion.

If a paper published recently in the journal Nature* is right, two moons once graced our night skies. The proposition has not been proven, but has drawn widespread attention.

"It's an intriguing idea," says David Smith, GRAIL deputy principal investigator at the Goddard Space Flight Center. "And it would be a way to explain one of the great perplexities of the Earth-Moon system – the Moon's strangely asymmetrical nature. Its near and far sides are substantially different."

The Moon's near side, facing us, is dominated by vast smooth 'seas' of ancient hardened lava. In contrast, the far side is marked by mountainous highlands. Researchers have long struggled to account for the differences, and the "two moon" theory introduced by Martin Jutzi and Erik Asphaug of the University of California at Santa Cruz is the latest attempt.

Scientists agree that when a Mars-sized object crashed into our planet about 4 billion years ago, the resulting debris cloud coalesced to form the Moon. Jutzi and Asphaug posit that the debris cloud actually formed two moons. A second, smaller chunk of debris landed in just the right orbit to lead or follow the bigger Moon around Earth.
"Normally, such moons accrete into a single body shortly after formation," explains Smith. "But the new theory proposes that the second moon ended up at one of the Lagrange points in the Earth-Moon system."

Lagrange points are a bit like gravitational fly traps. They can hold an object for a long time--but not necessarily forever. The second moon eventually worked its way out and collided with its bigger sister. The collision occurred at such a low velocity that the impact did not form a crater. Instead, the smaller moon 'went splat,' forming the contemporary far side highlands.

In short, the lunar highlands are the lost moon's remains.

"By probing the Moon's gravity field, GRAIL will 'see' inside the Moon, illuminating the differences between the near and far sides."

GRAIL will fly twin spacecraft around the Moon for several months. All the while, a microwave ranging system will precisely measure the distance between the two spacecraft. By watching that distance expand and contract as the pair fly over the lunar surface, researchers can map the Moon's underlying gravity field.

"These measurements will tell us a lot about the distribution of material inside the Moon, and give us pretty definitive information about the differences in the two sides of the Moon's crust and mantle. If the density of crustal material on the lunar far side differs from that on the near side in a particular way, the finding will lend support to the 'two moon' theory."

GRAIL and the mystery of the missing moon
Enlarge

Flying in formation around the Moon, NASA's twin GRAIL spacecraft will make precise measurements of the lunar gravitational field. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

But this information is just one "piece of the jigsaw puzzle." To prove a sister ever existed, other pieces are needed. NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has already provided key information on the Moon's surface topography. Scientists can also refer to lunar surface chemistry data and look at old seismic information from Apollo for clues.

But what's really needed, says Smith, is a sample return mission to the far side to determine the ages of rocks there.

"The smaller moon, if there was one, was about 1/3 the size of our current . So upon collision it would have cooled down faster, and the rocks on the far side, where its remains are thought to have spread, would be older than the ones on the near side."

In any case, we have something new to think about. Shall we try singing "fly me to the moons" or "shine on harvest moons"?

"Don't go changing any song lyrics just yet," says Smith.

More information: * Jutzi, M. & Asphaug, E. Nature 476, 69-72 (2011).

Provided by JPL/NASA search and more info website

4.8 /5 (8 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

kevinrtrs
Sep 07, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (17)
Of even greater interest would be to explain why there's evidence of recent volcanic activity on that far side of the moon. How can such a small body still be volcanically active after about 4 billion years? Where does the energy come from?
Or would it be possible that the moon is perhaps not much older than 100k years?
blacksheep423
Sep 07, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (16)
what on earth would a person with your personal beliefs even be doing on a website concerned with science?
Robert_Wells
Sep 07, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
*sigh*
Silverhill
Sep 07, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (10)
what on earth would a person with your personal beliefs even be doing on a website concerned with science?
Trolling, of course. He's obviously not interested in debating and learning here.
RealScience
Sep 07, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (10)
kevin - First, the impact that created the moon did not require just the right angle at just the right spot with just the right momentum - if these had been different, we would have had a different moon. And the same is true for the proposed two-moon impact - if it came in at a different speed or was a different size, the moon would now be different.
Second, just as the earth / big-moon L4 or L5 (the meta-stable Lagrange points) may have been a 'fly trap' for the second moon (if this recent hypothesis is correct), and would produce the right speed for that impact, it is very likely that the earth/sun L4 or L5 point served as a 'fly trap for the impactor that created the moon (or moons). An impactor freed from the earth/sun L4/L5 would tend to come in at the right speed for its impact to create a moon like our moon.
And third, scientists have tried lots of explanations, and thrown out those that don't fit the data. You should try that with creationist theories and see what's left...
OckhamsRazor
Sep 07, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (10)
If you don't have any other explanation then it simply boils down to the majority vote so everyone can keep quiet and carry on with their lives.


Isn't that kind of like how Christianity came about?
InterestedAmateur
Sep 07, 2011

Rank: 4.6 / 5 (10)
Please do not feed the trolls it only encourages them.
hard2grep
Sep 08, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Of even greater interest would be to explain why there's evidence of recent volcanic activity on that far side of the moon. How can such a small body still be volcanically active after about 4 billion years? Where does the energy come from?
Or would it be possible that the moon is perhaps not much older than 100k years?


"Just recent" must be considered in "GOD-time". With thoughts like that, you could be waiting a while for the second coming.
Graeme
Sep 08, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
If a second moon impacted the Moon it would introduce some extra spin to it. Being lopsided after the impact there would be a more stable position and as the spin reduced it would eventually have rocked backwards and forwards around the most stable position.

This would explain why the front and back are different as if it was west and east hemisphere that would have been a less stable position. The probes should be able to determine if the mass distribution reflects this.
Peteri
Sep 08, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
"The Moon's near side ... is dominated by vast smooth 'seas' of ancient hardened lava."

These maria are themselves large impact basins back-filled with lava. Presumably, these impact basins covered the whole of the moon's surface at one stage (i.e. before the "Big Splat" covered those on the far-side).

Radiometric dating of maria basalts suggests that the greatest volume of these erupted from 3.9 to 3.2 bya and these eruptions occurred about 0.5by after the cratering events.

Various reports I've read on the "Big Splat" theory mention that the secondary moon would have remained at whichever Lagrange point for a few 10's or 100's of millions of years before being de-stabilised and eventually impacting with the primary moon.

Could it be that the "Big Splat" impact event provided sufficient energy to trigger the eruptions of lava that filled the maria on the diametrically opposite near-side. If so, then we could pin down the timing of this event to the start of these eruptions.
Rank 4.8 /5 (8 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Distance of planets from stars and revolution
    created3 hours ago
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study

(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.

Space & Earth / Environment

created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy

Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...

Space & Earth / Environment

created 3 hours ago | popularity 4 / 5 (1) | comments 10 | with audio podcast

10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction

It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 3 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 51

Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director

Alien life probably isn’t interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (14) | comments 39


'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Almost half of new vets seek disability

(AP) -- America's newest veterans are filing for disability benefits at a historic rate, claiming to be the most medically and mentally troubled generation of former troops the nation has ever seen.

Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...