Arctic ice cover hits historic low: scientists
September 10, 2011 by Marlowe Hood
A fishermen in Arctic waters off the coast of Greenland. The area covered by Arctic sea ice reached it lowest point this week since the start of satellite observations in 1972, German researchers announced on Saturday.
The area covered by Arctic sea ice reached its lowest point this week since the start of satellite observations in 1972, German researchers announced on Saturday.
"On September 8, the extent of the Arctic sea ice was 4.240 million square kilometres (1.637 million square miles). This is a new historic minimum," said Georg Heygster, head of the Physical Analysis of Remote Sensing Images unit at the University of Bremen's Institute of Environmental Physics.
The new mark is about half-a-percent under his team's measurements of the previous record, which occurred on September 16, 2007, he said.
According to the US National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), the record set on that date was 4.1 million sq km (1.6 sq mi). The discrepancy, Heygster explained by phone, was due to slightly different data sets and algorithms.
"But the results are internally consistent in both cases," he said, adding that he expected the NSIDC to come to the same conclusion in the coming days.
Arctic ice cover plays a critical role in regulating Earth's climate by reflecting sunlight and keeping the polar region cool.
Retreating summer sea ice -- 50 percent smaller in area than four decades ago -- is described by scientists as both a measure and a driver of global warming, with negative impacts on a local and planetary scale.
It is also further evidence of a strong human imprint on climate patterns in recent decades, the researchers said.
"The sea ice retreat can no more be explained with the natural variability from one year to the next, caused by weather influence," Heygster said in an statement released by the university.
"Climate models show, rather, that the reduction is related to the man-made global warming which, due to the albedo effect, is particularly pronounced in the Arctic."
Albedo increases when an area once covered by reflective snow or ice -- which bounces 80 percent of the Sun's radiative force back into space -- is replaced by deep blue sea, which absorbs the heat instead.
Temperatures in the Arctic region have risen more than twice as fast as the global average over the last half century.
The Arctic ice cover has also become significantly thinner in recent decades, though it is not possible to measure the shrinkage in thickness as precisely as for surface area, the statement said.
Satellite tracking since 1972 shows that the extent of Arctic sea ice is dropping at about 11 percent per decade.
NSIDC director Mark Serreze has said that summer ice cover could disappear entirely by 2030, leaving nothing but heat-trapping "blue ocean."
The NSIDC likewise monitors Arctic ice cover on a daily basis, but has not announced record-low ice cover. Data posted on its website as of Saturday only covered the period through September 6.
By last week, it said, sea ice is almost completely gone from the channels of the Northwest Passage. The southern route -- also known as Amunden's Route -- was also ice free, as was the Northern Sea Route along Siberia.
But even as the thaw opens shipping lanes, it disrupts the lives and livelihoods of indigenous peoples, and poses a severe threat to fauna, including polar bears, ice seals and walruses, conservation groups say.
"This stunning loss of Arctic sea ice is yet another wake-up call that climate change is here now and is having devastating effects around the world," said Shaye Wolf, climate science director at the Center for Biological Diversity in San Francisco.
The last time the Arctic was uncontestably free of summertime ice was 125,000 years ago, during the height of the last major interglacial period, known as the Eemian.
Air temperatures in the Arctic were warmer than today, and sea level was also four to six metres (13 to 20 feet) higher because the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets had partly melted.
Global average temperatures today are close to the maximum warmth seen during the Eemian.
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
14 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
37
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
What's the big deal about private space launches?
(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
35
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (28)
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (22)
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (21)
I am sure that the data collected by the satellites was part of the 'scam'. After all, any data that doesn't support your ideology is automatically a lie on the face of it. Not because you have any data to refute it, just because you have your little mind already made up.
One word for this type of anti-scientific bias is 'Luddite'. Another is 'Moron'.
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
This could be sarcasm..
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (10)
Over the next decade, dozens of papers appeared by physicists, geologists, biologists, chemists, and even a few climate specialists. The theme was that the Little Ice Age, and the Medieval Warm Period were real and global in scope. Michael Mann then withdrew the hockey stick, but people keep printing it. It is not the data in the blade which is bad, that came from a different source. It's the missing bumps in the handle which make it a sideways Z.
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (12)
2. The Sun has evolved and is evolving.
3. Life has evolved and is evolving
We are protected from dangerous irradiation emitted by the Sun's pulsar core by:
a.) A solar mantle made mostly of Fe, O, Ni, Si, S, Mg and Ca
b.) A solar photosphere made mostly of waste products (H and He)
c.) Distance from the Sun
References:
1. "The demise of established dogmas on the formation of the Solar System", Nature 303 (1983) 286
http://tallbloke....1983.pdf
2. "Is the Universe expanding?", Journal of Cosmology 13, 4187-4190 (2011).
http://journalofc...102.html
3. "Origin and evolution of life", The Journal of Modern Physics 2, 587-594 (2011)
http://dl.dropbox...5079.pdf
4. "Neutron repulsion", The APEIRON Journal, in press (2011)
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA PI for Apollo
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (14)
Air temperatures in the Arctic were warmer than today, and sea level was also four to six metres (13 to 20 feet) higher because the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets had partly melted.
Global average temperatures today are close to the maximum warmth seen during the Eemian."
I wonder what kind of man-caused carbon dioxide overload caused that situation?
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (9)
Perhaps you should ask one of the thousands of scientists who are studying this issue plasslaapie. After all - the topic was raised in this paper - so it is likely they are aware of it. I believe there are many factors that have influenced the climate shifts throughout the earth's history - and climate scientists are of course studying all of these issues. Despite this knowledge - they believe that green house gasses are the primary driver of the current warming trend.
David.
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
Really, and where did you read this?
Novel Analysis Confirms Climate "Hockey Stick" Graph November 2009
http://www.scient...han-ever
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (8)
Try looking up "Milankovitch cycles" and stop believing science thinks the only driver of climate over the Earth's history has been man.
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (7)
Very consistent with my own independent rough approximations, in which I totally ignored positive feedbacks from CO2 and "other" albedo effects, and focused just on changes in albedo in the arctic alone.
I found that using a linear regression, and then projecting it forward in time, all of the sea ice would be gone in the summer of 2053.
Using exponential regressions and projecting them forwards in time, I found the ice would be gone as early as the summer of 2026.
Changing the coefficient of the exponential regressions makes almost no difference in timing, usually 1 to 3 years at most for reasonable margins of error in the estimate/guestimate.
After some intuitive studying of the changes in albedo and the energy absorbed to melt ice, I discovered a "cycle" of 4 to 6 years in the rate of cumulative melting...continued...
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (7)
I was able to apply some intuitive graphical analysis and the sequence of the sum of integers, and some other mathematical trickery to devise in a THIRD way that the ice will definitly be melted within just a few decades.
It goes like this: If 1 unit of ice can totally pay for it's own melting through albedo changes within 4 to 6 years, then the rate of melting accumulates like so:
1 2 3 4 ...
which is the same as n(n 1)/2, to tell us the sum of the unit of ice that have had a net loss melting after "n" cycles, and therefore how much "extra" radiation is being absorbed instead of reflected.
While this is purely abstract, it allows upper and lower limits on the rate of melting
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
This charade misrepresented observations [3-6] for decades that showed
a. Earths climate always changes
b. The Sun always evolves
c. Life continuously evolves
1. Khrushchev-Kennedy Letters (Oct 1962) www.historyteache...Days.pdf
2. Deep roots of Climategate (2011)
http://dl.dropbox...oots.pdf
3. The demise of dogmas on Solar System origin, Nature 303 (1983) 286
http://tallbloke....1983.pdf
4. Is the Universe expanding?, J. Cosmology 13, 4187-4190 (2011).
http://journalofc...102.html
5. Evolution of life, Mod Physics 2, 587-594 (2011)
http://dl.dropbox...5079.pdf
6. Neutron repulsion, A. J. (2011)
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (6)
Everyone knows earth's climate has always changed.
Personally, I don't "care" what is causing the change, per se, only the results.
Whatever portion is man-made, which it turns out is the smallest variable of all, will eventually need to be addressed, I suppose.
For example, I found that for the melting of Greenland, the ice cap could theoretically melt within 410 years through albedo changes alone, and ignoring increases in CO2.
On the other hand, if you increase CO2 somewhat as it has been, on a slop of 2.2 PPM per year for the next hundred years, but treat albedo as constant, then greenland's ice could melt in 950 years, which is over twice as long.
But if you combine the two effects, as the real world does, the Greenland's ice could melt TOTALLY in as little as 300 years, by my calculations.
So even if the production of CO2 rose continually for the next 100 years, the CO2 would only be contributing 1/3rd as much of the total global warming as albedo.
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (6)
precession of the earth's orbit and axis.
Minor pole shifts caused by the earthquakes and sea level rise.*
* yes, sea level rise would lengthen days, but also, in the case of greenland's ice melting, it would cause a minor, gradual pole shift as ice melted and water became "level" with the mean sea level having risen; since the greenland ice cap is assymetric and is not centered on the pole, conservation of angular momentum would require the planet's axis of rotation to change, perhaps by a few feet or so, not huge, as the ice melts. This would obviously cause further "minor" climate change.
Everything is related. Climate changes geology, and geology changes climate.
The system is neither closed nor isolated, NOR is it a one-dimensional classical textbook problem where we can temporarily ignore variables...
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
http://en.wikiped...h_cycles
As was pointed out above. For those who think this is business as usual, stop watching Fox News for your science source.
And, for Oliver, please restart your medication. We really don't want to hear more about neutron repulsion being the basis for every thread on this site.
One of the posters above said it best when he referred to those "refuting" this article as Luddites.
Please show your work, eachus, when you make claims about the "hockey stick" as was pointed out by jamesrm above. eachus went so far as to call this a war when it is science (possibly used as a means to continue to pollute). Interesting posts on this report of measurements.
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (8)
I do not have experience of climate science, but the experts of climate science have a 99% consensus.
Since the experts are spread across all continents and base their research on hundreds of thousands of data sets, the idea of a global science conspiracy is about as credible as blaming stuff on aliens from Zeta Reticuli.
If you want to look for malign intent, you need not go further than R. Murdoch, the owner of Fox News. A simple check will show that he has consistently used his media to further the agendas of his political allies. His current political allies oppose action on climate change, and by a strange coincidence Fox News belittle all evidence of climate change...
Think for yourself. And when the issues are too complex for any individual, look to the best current science for advice.