Invisibility carpet cloak can hide objects from visible light
June 15, 2011 by Lisa Zyga
When an input beam (black arrow) reflects off (a) a bump without a cloak, the bump causes a perturbation. When the beam reflects off (b) a bump covered by a cloak, the cloak masks the bump, and the reflected beam is reconstructed as if the bump did not exist. (c) Light after reflection from a flat mirror, a bump without a cloak, and a cloaked bump, at three different wavelengths. Image credit: Majid Gharghi, et al. ©2011 American Chemical Society
(PhysOrg.com) -- Most of the invisibility cloaks that have been demonstrated to date conceal objects at frequencies that are not detectable by the human eye. Designing invisibility cloaks that can conceal objects from visible light has been more challenging due to the strict material requirements. But in a new study, researchers have fabricated a carpet cloak that can make objects undetectable in the full visible spectrum.
The researchers, led by Prof. Xiang Zhang at the University of California, Berkeley, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, have published their study in a recent issue of Nano Letters.
As the researchers explain, most previous invisibility cloaks have used metallic metamaterials for cloaking at microwave frequencies. But at optical frequencies, the metal absorbs too much light and leads to significant metallic loss, and Berkeley and other groups have had to design dielectric cloaks at infrared frequencies. More recently, researchers at University of Birmingham (UK) have experimented with using uniaxial crystals as the cloak material, which can enable cloaking in visible frequencies, but only for a certain polarization of light.
In the current study, the researchers used a technique called quasi conformal mapping (QCM) to conceal an object with a height of 300 nm and a width of 6 µm underneath a reflective carpet cloak. The carpet itself has the appearance of a smooth optical mirror, so that the object and the bump that the object makes underneath the carpet are undetectable by visible light.
The carpet cloak means that you conceal the object under a layer, which we call carpet, but you see the carpet like a normal mirror, as if it is flat with no bump caused by putting the object underneath, Zhang told PhysOrg.com. This way, the observer won't recognize something is concealed underneath.
In order to guide visible light around the concealed object, the researchers had to make light travel at different speeds while approaching the bump. They achieved this by designing the materials to have a variable refractive index, transforming them into metamaterials, since they dont appear in nature. The researchers placed a silicon nitride waveguide on a transparent nanoporous silicon oxide substrate that they specially developed to have a much lower refractive index than that of the waveguide. Using nanofabrication techniques, the researchers etched tiny holes into the nitride to make a desired pattern, giving the waveguide the cloaking refractive index profile.
The concept of the carpet cloak was originally suggested so that you can design a certain pattern for a given size of the bump, and hide an object of arbitrary shape under that, Zhang said. If you need to make a bigger size bump to hide a bigger object, a new hole pattern will be required.
With this refractive index profile, along with the transparency of both the waveguide and the substrate, the cloak could completely conceal an object by producing a light beam profile identical to a beam reflected from a flat carpet with no object underneath.
This device is among the first cloak devices that operate at visible frequencies; the other very recent visible light cloaks operate based on a principle that relies on a certain polarization of light, whereas the quasi-conformal-based principle does not rely on the polarization, Zhang said. Of course, the waveguide geometry entails different operation for different polarizations, which is extrinsic to the QCM design.
In addition to cloaking, the new technique provides an important step toward implementing optical transformation structures in the visible range. Using transformation optics (TO), researchers can manipulate light for applications such as powerful microscopes and computers.
The carpet cloak is an example of a wide family of devices that can be made based on transformation optics, Zhang said. Besides invisibility, all kinds of optical illusion schemes can be made based on the concept, where the observer receives a different impression when looking at an object. The capability to manipulate light propagation can be used in energy devices, optical computing devices, and beyond, wherever it is desired to have full control on the light path; TO lets us redirect light and re-route it.
More information: Majid Gharghi, et al. A Carpet Cloak for Visible Light. Nano Letters. DOI: 10.1021/nl201189z
Copyright 2011 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
[Drift velocity] Factors affecting velocity
3 hours ago
-
does cold gasoline have less energy
3 hours ago
-
distribution of molecules throughout the atmosphere
5 hours ago
-
The Global Positioning System !
6 hours ago
-
A Question relating Power
7 hours ago
-
Writing a book so im learning about things, i have some general questions please read
10 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.2 / 5 (21) |
47
|
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
15
|
Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots
(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of robots as a laser ...
Sound increases the efficiency of boiling
Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...
May 24, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (12)
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (8)
And since when has the speed of light been "infinite"?
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
For telepathy, "Brain-computer-interface" experiments, for telekinesis try, "Mach effect", for prediction of lottery numbers, look up "quantum temporal entanglement" experiments.
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (7)
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I would say yes you are correct. But the answer to the problem is creating a material with quantum properties allowing the light to be absorbed, and emitted with out interference. Allowing the light to follow it's original trajectory. Having materials of said properties it would not be a far stretch to expand that into absorption of radiation, and any number of other harmful energies. Shielding for reactors that absorb the radiation, and convert directly to electricity. Maybe i'm just dreaming but someone has to have the idea for the first time.
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Wrong
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Jun 16, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
You gotta love this guy, do you think he understands the principles of a BEC?
Jun 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jun 16, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Are you suggesting that you have the ability to change a property of a particular particle and have its entangled twin somewhere else instantaneously change properties? Is there any evidence of this ever happening anywhere? I would honestly enjoy seeing that
Jun 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
bigger -> greater
it's -> its
i -> I
Entanglement is no more interaction than a pair of socks; it's conjugation.
Jun 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Wiki says...
"when the spin of only one of the two entangled electrons is measured, the spin of the other immediately becomes determinate. Before the measurement, it is impossible to describe the spins of the electrons independently, and only the combined spin of the two-electron system is known. After the measurement of one of the electrons, the correlated spins of the two electrons become determinate. Measuring the value of the spin of one disentangles the particles, and forces the other to take on its own, separate spin value. This occurs even though the particles are now separated by arbitrarily large distances."
Please enlighten me...
Jun 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
The constant speed of light that you know of is the slowest speed light travels, light travels faster in a vacuum.
Jun 19, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
Einstein called it "Spooky action at a distance" and refused to believe in it. Yet later experimentation has confirmed the effect.
This is very counter-intuitive, and many theories have been proposed to try to explain it. It's as if, even if separated, the particles were still a single item. One theory even proposes that there is a kind of back-propagation in time between quantum "particles".. Hmm.
Jun 20, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (3)
No. Not change properties.
Entangled particles are said to have indefinite properties until one or the other is interfered with (measured). The perceived natural phenomena is that once one of the pair is measured, you can with certainty infer the properties of the other particle. There's debate on whether or not the real values are actually determined at the moment of entanglement and a question if the maths meaning is properly interpreted.
Regardless, the inference is reliable at arbitrary distances.
Personally, I think physicists take statistics to literally, a consequence of the nature of physics education. Physicists seem to always forget that maths is abstract representations of ideas.
Jun 20, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (3)
That situation can easily be exploited to argue something more fantastical, and I hear people say they're right just because you can't prove them wrong. Except that relativity works at large distances, and when you separate particles by large distances the speed of light applies, then finally from there it becomes obvious what the truth must be.
There's only one way to show the fantastical interpretation of entanglement is true; measure particle A in a pair of entangled particles, entangle particle A and measure it again. This requires being able to keep track of which particle is A, which you can't, and it would require A to acquire different properties at random.
Jun 20, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
@ MGB, the definition you grabbed is correct but you're interpreting it wrong. A very simplified example of this theory would be to take two similar objects with different colors, red and blue, and put them in a bowl. Close your eyes, grab one of the objects, and walk into another room. When you get there, you have no idea which object is in your hand. However, when you open your eyes and see the color, suddenly you have brand new information that was unknown before you opened your eyes. Instantaneously, you know the exact color of the object you left in the bowl. "Info" is the key word. It appears to travel faster than light, although you no longer have the ability to CHANGE the info of the other object (continued)
Jun 20, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I've got a really good book on "Information." If anyone is intersted, I can dig it out of my boxes and give you the name. It does a really good job of breaking down the semantic barriers of terms like "information" and "quantum entanglement". It explains why things like the tachyon don't exist but that they might suddenly exist in huge quantities if we find a way to measure them...
Jun 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Thanks for your elaboration on the issue. Intuitively, your explanation feels better than the one I understand. If you are correct in your analogy, however, the effect becomes simple and a child could understand that. Why then did Einstein find such an issue "spooky"? And why does Wiki go out-of-their-way to state "This occurs even though the particles are now separated by arbitrarily large distances."? My question is definitely rhetorical, but I'd really appreciate an answer if you have time. Cheers.
Jun 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
It comes down to how individuals of different disciplines interpret mathematical statements. Some read equations too literally, other's more realistically, other in between. Interpreting a maths statement can be a challenge.
My immediate intuition of the concept of an 'observer' in physics, after understanding that observation was always associated with interaction, leads me to understand that all matter and energy is an "observer." The term itself was a terrible choice, causes my intepretation to seem to not make sense. Which is why the earth didn't spontaneously transform in to a ball of yarn before life evolved.
I'm sure you think that is ridiculous, but then again you may not have seen the quantum mechanics documentary called "What the Bleep Do We Know!? & What the Bleep!? - Down the Rabbit Hole". See that to understand the consequences of ridiculous interpretations.
You don't need a correct interpretation of a statement to correctly manipulate the terms.