Fermilab experiment fails to confirm new particle claim
June 13, 2011 by Lisa Zyga
DZero data: If DZero were to detect the new particle that CDF detected, there should have been a signal around 145 GeV/c2 (dashed line). The red peak below 100 GeV/c2 is a feature of W and Z boson decays that is predicted by the Standard Model. Image credit: Fermilab
(PhysOrg.com) -- In April, scientists at one of Fermilabs two particle detectors, CDF, observed what they thought might be a new particle not predicted by the Standard Model. But now, scientists at the labs second detector, DZero, have cross-checked the observation with their own independent data and analysis tools, and have found no evidence of a new particle. Instead, the DZero data are in agreement with predictions from the Standard Model.
Originally, CDF scientists observed the possible new particle when analyzing proton-antiproton collisions that produce a W boson - a particle associated with the weak nuclear force - and two jets of particles. At a collision energy of about 145 GeV, the scientists observed about 253 more electrons and muons than expected. The excess implies the existence of a particle with a mass of 145 GeV, but no known particles have this mass. The finding led the scientists to predict the existence of a new particle with a mass of 145 GeV that decays into an extra W boson that in turn decays into electrons and muons, in addition to other decay products. Some theorists suggested that the new particle might provide evidence for a fifth fundamental force of nature known as "technicolor.
At first, the effect at CDF had a magnitude of three standard deviations, or three sigma, which means that there is about a 1 in 1,000 chance that the result is attributable to some statistical fluctuation in the data. In particle physics, the three-sigma level of certainty is intriguing, but a five-sigma level (about a 1 in 1 million chance that the result is a fluke) is needed to claim a discovery. Then, at a conference on May 30th at Blois, France, CDF co-spokesperson Giovanni Punzi announced that the scientists had analyzed more data and the effect was now at just below the five-sigma level.
So DZeros failure to confirm the same excess at 145 GeV is a bit of a letdown. On the other hand, it raises the question of what exactly is causing the discrepancy between the two results. Fermilab has two detectors for this very reason, to check each others results. However, disagreements like this one dont occur very often. For the more than 500 measurements that CDF and DZero have independently detected and analyzed over the past 10 years, the results have agreed more than 99% of the time.
This is exactly how science works, said DZero co-spokesperson Stefan Sӧldner-Rembold in a Fermilab press release. Independent verification of any new observation is the key principle of scientific research. At the Tevatron, we have two experiments that, by design, can check each other.
Going forward, Fermilab plans to create a task force that will consist of scientists from both CDF and DZero to coordinate an analysis of the two detectors results in order to understand the disagreement.
The investigation for the possible 145-GeV particle could be one of the last opportunities to discover new physics at Fermilabs Tevatron, at least while its still running. The collidor is scheduled to be shut down this September due to budget cuts at the US Department of Energy. After the final shutdown, scientists will still have billions of collision events to sift through, and they expect that data analysis will continue for at least five more years.
More information: DZero paper (submitted to Physical Review Letters) and CDF paper (published in Physical Review Letters)
via: Fermilab press release, BBC News, Wired
© 2010 PhysOrg.com
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Events tonight
1 hour ago
-
does cold gasoline have less energy
1 hour ago
-
distribution of molecules throughout the atmosphere
3 hours ago
-
The Global Positioning System !
4 hours ago
-
A Question relating Power
5 hours ago
-
Writing a book so im learning about things, i have some general questions please read
8 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.2 / 5 (21) |
47
|
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
15
|
Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots
(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of robots as a laser ...
Sound increases the efficiency of boiling
Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...
May 24, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (8)
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (13)
As the spokesperson at DZero stated: "This is exactly how science works".
Leave your hypercritical nonsense elsewhere.
These findings don't deny that CDF saw something. Now what needs to be determined is what it saw. Detector error? Contamination from external source? (i.e. cosmic ray, neutrino, ???)
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (10)
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.2782
has been refused with D0 collaboration, too:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2063
The rumors of Higgs boson finding leaked from both Tevatron, both LHC recently are the cases of the similar nature. They were both denied with officials a few days later.
http://www.bbc.co...10625172
http://www.time.c...,00.html
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Jun 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
And finally, it is not a case of there is no peak at 145 GeV in the D0 data. What they are saying is that 1) their data is consistent with the Standard Model, or 2) with a particle of much smaller cross-section than CDF collaboration saw.
Expect both collaborations to now work together to try to identify whether the simulation software they are using to predict the background is producing the difference in what is "seen" at the two detectors. What should come out of this is a better characterization of the background, or it could identify differences in the sensitivity of the two detectors to this type of event. Lots more work to do...
Jun 14, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
It is all part of Lucifer's global conspiracy to establish a one world government.
In reality, what you have seen is the result of an open process, where research results are released before the final result is nailed down.
Team A gets a result - puts it up on line. Team B then begins the process of confirmation which takes months, and publishes their results on line.
Team A and Team B have already begun a process of reviewing their methods and analytic techniques in order to understand the discrepancy.
Jun 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Indeed, an example of science in action, rather than inaction! ;-)
Jun 14, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Jun 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jun 14, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Jun 16, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
I will agree that the ratings are sometimes misleading. I would encourage anybody that got this far in this thread that if you disagree with a comment's rating click on the username who got rated, click the little arrow thingy in the center bar and see who rated them. It says a lot about the criticism to know where it is coming from. I pride myself in dogbert 1's.
Jun 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Aug 03, 2011
Rank: not rated yet