New calculations on blackbody energy set the stage for clocks with unprecedented accuracy

May 9, 2011 By Ben Stein

( -- A team of physicists from the United States and Russia announced today that it has developed a means for computing, with unprecedented accuracy, a tiny, temperature-dependent source of error in atomic clocks. Although small, the correction could represent a big step towards atomic timekeepers' longstanding goal of a clock with a precision equivalent to one second of error every 32 billion years—longer than the age of the universe.

Precision timekeeping is one of the bedrock technologies of modern science and technology. It underpins precise navigation on Earth and in deep space, synchronization of broadband data streams, precision measurements of motion, forces and fields, and tests of the constancy of the laws of nature over time.

"Using our calculations, researchers can account for a subtle effect that is one of the largest contributors to error in modern atomic timekeeping," says lead author Marianna Safronova of the University of Delaware, the first author of the presentation. "We hope that our work will further improve upon what is already the most accurate measurement in science: the frequency of the quantum-logic clock," adds co-author Charles Clark, a physicist at the Joint Quantum Institute, a collaboration of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the University of Maryland.

The paper was presented today at the 2011 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics in Baltimore, Md.

The team studied an effect that is familiar to anyone who has basked in the warmth of a campfire: heat radiation. Any object at any temperature, whether the walls of a room, a person, the Sun or a hypothetical perfect radiant heat source known as a "black body," emits heat radiation. Even a completely isolated atom senses the temperature of its environment. Like heat swells the air in a hot-air balloon, so-called "blackbody radiation" (BBR) enlarges the size of the electron clouds within the atom, though to a much lesser degree—by one part in a hundred trillion, a size that poses a severe challenge to precision measurement.

This effect comes into play in the world's most precise atomic clock, recently built by NIST researchers. This quantum-logic clock, based on atomic in the aluminum , Al+, has an uncertainty of 1 second per 3.7 billion years, translating to 1 part in 8.6 x 10-18, due to a number of small effects that shift the actual tick rate of the clock.

To correct for the BBR shift, the team used the quantum theory of atomic structure to calculate the BBR shift of the atomic energy levels of the aluminum ion. To gain confidence in their method, they successfully reproduced the energy levels of the aluminum ion, and also compared their results against a predicted BBR shift in a strontium ion clock recently built in the United Kingdom. Their calculation reduces the relative uncertainty due to room-temperature BBR in the aluminum ion to 4 x 10-19 , or better than 18 decimal places, and a factor of 7 better than previous BBR calculations.

Current aluminum-ion clocks have larger sources of uncertainty than the BBR effect, but next-generation aluminum clocks are expected to greatly reduce those larger uncertainties and benefit substantially from better knowledge of the BBR shift.

Explore further: A Quantum Mechanical 'Tune Up' for Better Measurement

More information: M. Safronova, M. Kozlov and C.W. Clark, "Precision Calculation of Blackbody Radiation Shifts for Metrology at the 18th Decimal Place." Paper CFC 3, presented on May 6,2011, at CLEO 2011, Baltimore, Md. Also presented on May 3, 2011, at the 2011 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium & the European Frequency and Time Forum, San Francisco, Calif., Paper 7175.

Related Stories

A Quantum Mechanical 'Tune Up' for Better Measurement

June 5, 2004

By exploiting the weird quantum behavior of atoms, physicists at the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have demonstrated a new technique that someday could be used to save weeks ...

Optical Atomic Clock: A long look at the captured atoms

February 5, 2008

Optical clocks might become the atomic clocks of the future. Their "pendulum", i.e. the regular oscillation process which each clock needs, is an oscillation in the range of the visible light. As its frequency is higher than ...

New Research Promises Better Atomic Clocks

April 22, 2009

( -- The most accurate timekeepers in the world are atomic clocks, which tell time based on the absorption of a very specific and unchanging microwave frequency, which induces electrons in an atom to “jump” ...

Recommended for you

New blow for 'supersymmetry' physics theory

July 27, 2015

In a new blow for the futuristic "supersymmetry" theory of the universe's basic anatomy, experts reported fresh evidence Monday of subatomic activity consistent with the mainstream Standard Model of particle physics.

Rogue wave theory to save ships

July 29, 2015

Physicists have found an explanation for rogue waves in the ocean and hope their theory will lead to devices to warn ships and save lives.

Researchers build bacteria's photosynthetic engine

July 29, 2015

Nearly all life on Earth depends on photosynthesis, the conversion of light energy into chemical energy. Oxygen-producing plants and cyanobacteria perfected this process 2.7 billion years ago. But the first photosynthetic ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) May 09, 2011
Calculations for monovalent systems, such as Ca+, Sr+, and Rb are carried out using a relativistic all-order single-double method, where all single and double excitations of the Dirac-Fock wave function are included to all orders of perturbation theory.

This is more for Skeptic Heretic. I don't know the following phenomenon: "blackbody radiation" (BBR) enlarges the size of the electron clouds within the atom, though to a much lesser degreeby one part in a hundred trillion, a size that poses a severe challenge to precision measurement.
5 / 5 (1) May 09, 2011
I think they have put a minus sign where a ^ should be. For instance they say: "1 part in 8.6 x 10-18" I think it should be "1 part in 8.6 x 10^18." They did not do this in the second representation since they noted it was an uncertainty the second time:

"...relative uncertainty due to room-temperature BBR in the aluminum ion to 4 x 10-19 , or better than 18 decimal places..."

If they mean the least significant digit of the above (8.6 x 10-18) that would be different but it appears they mean unity compared to a large number (the number of seconds in 3.7 billion years"). Instead they appear to be comparing unity to a very small number (which would huge). Am I missing something?
5 / 5 (1) May 09, 2011
Neat. Next, we need to lock down mass before our friends in Paris go nuts!
4 / 5 (2) May 10, 2011
So, with the old clock, if you made a 12 O'clock appointment with your doctor for 3.7 billion years time you might show up a whole second late...thank goodness they closed that loophole....
not rated yet May 10, 2011
an uncertainty of 1 second per 3.7 billion years, translating to 1 part in 8.6 x 10-18
3.7 billion years are 1.17*10**17 seconds. The reciprocal of the number is 8.6*10**(-18), the reciprocal of "second" is "per second".
Now the old uncertainty has been reduced to 4*10**(-19) per second. I think this is a factor of 21 (not: 7) better than before.
1 / 5 (1) May 10, 2011
Still 7.4 X 10^24 times the Plank Time,... so get back to work.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.