It's all in a name: 'Global warming' vs. 'climate change'

March 8, 2011

Many Americans are skeptical about whether the world's weather is changing, but apparently the degree of skepticism varies systematically depending on what that change is called.

According to a University of Michigan study published in the forthcoming issue of Public Opinion Quarterly, more people believe in "climate change" than in "."

"Wording matters," said Jonathon Schuldt, the lead author of the article about the study and a doctoral candidate in the U-M Department of Psychology.

Schuldt co-authored the study with U-M psychologists Sara Konrath and Norbert Schwarz. For the research, they conducted a question wording experiment in the American Life Panel, an conducted by RAND, with a national sample of 2,267 U.S. adults. Participants were asked to report their level of certainty about whether is a serious problem. In the following question, half the participants heard one version, half heard the other:

"You may have heard about the idea that the world's temperature may have been going up [changing] over the past 100 years, a phenomenon sometimes called 'global warming' ['climate change']. What is your personal opinion regarding whether or not this has been happening?

Overall, 74 percent of people thought the problem was real when it was referred to as climate change, while about 68 percent thought it was real when it was referred to as global warming.

These different levels of belief may stem from the different associations carried by the two terms, Schuldt said. "While global warming focuses attention on temperature increases, climate change focuses attention on more general changes," he said. "Thus, an unusually cold day may increase doubts about global warming more so than about climate change. Given these different associations and the partisan nature of this issue, climate change believers and skeptics might be expected to vary in their use of these terms."

As part of the study, the researchers also analyzed the use of these two terms on political think tank websites, finding that liberals and conservatives used different terms. Conservative think tanks tend to call the phenomenon global warming, while liberal think tanks call it climate change.

And when the researchers analyzed responses to the survey by political orientation, they found that the different overall levels in belief were driven almost entirely by participants who identified themselves as Republicans. While 60 percent of Republicans reported that they thought climate change was real, for example, only 44 percent said they believed in the reality of global warming.

In contrast, about 86 percent of Democrats thought climate change was a serious problem, no matter what it was called. Why weren't they influenced by question wording? "It might be a ceiling effect, given their high level of belief," Konrath said. "Or it could be that Democrats' beliefs about global climate change might be more crystallized, and as a result, more protected from subtle manipulations."

The good news is that Americans may not be as polarized on the issue as previously thought. "The extent of the partisan divide on this issue depends heavily on question wording," said Schwarz, who is also affiliated with the U-M Ross Business School and the Institute of Social Research (ISR). "When the issue is framed as global warming, the partisan divide is nearly 42 percentage points. But when the frame is , the partisan divide drops to about 26 percentage points."

Explore further: Climate Report Marks New Era in Global Warming Battle, Science Historian Says

More information: For a free reprint from the journal's online depository:

Related Stories

Half of Britons deny climate change man-made: poll

December 6, 2009

Almost half of Britons do not believe human behaviour is the main cause of global warming, a new poll showed Sunday, a day before world leaders begin crunch climate talks in Copenhagen.

American opinion cools on global warming

January 27, 2010

Public concern about global warming has dropped sharply since the fall of 2008, according to a national survey released today by researchers at Yale and George Mason universities.

Recommended for you

From a very old skeleton, new insights on ancient migrations

October 9, 2015

Three years ago, a group of researchers found a cave in Ethiopia with a secret: it held the 4,500-year-old remains of a man, with his head resting on a rock pillow, his hands folded under his face, and stone flake tools surrounding ...

Mexican site yields new details of sacrifice of Spaniards

October 9, 2015

It was one of the worst defeats in one of history's most dramatic conquests: Only a year after Hernan Cortes landed in Mexico, hundreds of people in a Spanish-led convey were captured, sacrificed and apparently eaten.

Ancient genome from Africa sequenced for the first time

October 8, 2015

The first ancient human genome from Africa to be sequenced has revealed that a wave of migration back into Africa from Western Eurasia around 3,000 years ago was up to twice as significant as previously thought, and affected ...

Who you gonna trust? How power affects our faith in others

October 6, 2015

One of the ongoing themes of the current presidential campaign is that Americans are becoming increasingly distrustful of those who walk the corridors of power – Exhibit A being the Republican presidential primary, in which ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Mar 08, 2011
Metaphorically speaking, there is actually a 'magical, silver bullet' that literally destroys all framing and filters - just a few of the pieces belonging to the worst of a big list of pseudosciences.

Victims of your own folly, we will not be the ones to deterred you, America.
Carry on.
not rated yet Mar 08, 2011
Metaphorically speaking, there is actually a 'magical, silver bullet' that literally destroys all framing and filters - just a few of the pieces belonging to the worst of a big list of pseudosciences.

Victims of your own folly, we will not be the ones to deterred you, America.
Carry on.

Is that some kind of random word generator? You've got a metaphoric object that literally does something? Can you clarify your statement a little bit?
3 / 5 (2) Mar 09, 2011
Solid breakdown of the issue. The unholy trinity of christian conservatives, big corporations (in this case the fossil fuel industry), and "free market" purists have become very successful in smearing terms by repeatedly associating them with pejorative terminology. Wording matters.

Look at the word "liberal" for instance. In many parts of the countryside and suburbs it's almost a dirty word because a relentless assault on the word itself by the rabid right over the last 40 years. They have done the same thing with the media, by perpetually saying it is "liberal", when in fact it is corporate, has far more conservative leaning analysts, and references conservative think tanks far more often.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.