Teacher effort is linked to difficult students' inherited traits

Dec 16, 2010

Challenging students take up more of their teachers' time—and the difference between a tougher student and an easier one appears to be genetic, according to a new study published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. The study looked at young twins in the U.K. and asked their teachers how much of a handful they are.

"Policy-wise, there's a lot going on, blaming teachers for what's going on in the classrooms," says Renate Houts of Duke University, who cowrote the study with Avshalom Caspi and Terrie E. Moffitt of Duke, Robert C. Pianta of the University of Virginia, and Louise Arseneault of King's College London. Many school systems have considered paying teachers based on how much the children in their classes improve. "One of the things that seems to be missing is that teaching is more of a relationship. You have to consider both sides of that relationship, the children and the teachers," Houts says.

To look at how students affect teachers, the researchers used data from a twin study that followed 1,102 pairs of British twins from age 5 to age 12. Twin studies are useful because comparing fraternal and identical twins shows what differences between children are inherited and which are not. The study included questionnaires for the children's teachers about how much of their time was taken up by each child.

The researchers found that children who were more challenging at age five required more effort at age 12. They also found that it's something about the children that makes it that way—something heritable. They can't tell what it is, but they can tell it's there, and that their challenging behavior isn't, for example, the teacher's fault.

"What happens in the classroom isn't just a function of the teacher. It's also the kids who are in the classroom," says Houts. And it's possible to make life easier on teachers. It might be smart to spread the challenging evenly between classes, for example.

Also, parents and teachers should consider working with early on their challenging behaviors, so they don't cause as much trouble for teachers later. "If a teacher has to take time out to give individual attention to five challenging kids in her classroom, she can't focus on the whole ," Houts says.

Explore further: How does calling, texting and emailing affect teens socially?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Relationships Improve Student Success

Jun 29, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- When students are underachieving, school policymakers often examine class size, curriculum and funding, but University of Missouri researchers suggest establishing relationships may be a powerful ...

Pre-K students benefit when teachers are supportive

May 15, 2008

States are investing considerable amounts of money in pre-kindergarten programs for 4-year-olds. A new study finds that the quality of interactions between teachers and children plays a key role in accounting for gains in ...

Recommended for you

Scholar tracks the changing world of gay sexuality

2 hours ago

With same-sex marriage now legalized in 19 states and laws making it impossible to ban homosexuals from serving in the military, gay, lesbian and bisexual people are now enjoying more freedoms and rights than ever before.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

mashafalkov
not rated yet Dec 17, 2010
To me this doesn't appear to be a very scientific study. Studying twins for heritable traits in behavior or cognition is sketchy because besides having identical genes, they are often close to each other emotionally, receive similar attention levels and upbringing from parents, play the same games, etc. The behavioral characteristics that translate into being a challenging student might just as well be based on any of those other factors, though it still relieves the teacher of fault!

The large sample size is rather interesting. However, I do admit to a personal bias *against* any study that attempts to link behavioral and cognitive traits as common as "being challenging to teach" with genes. Particularly in Britain, there is a trend toward trying to profile children early on as criminals. Perhaps I'm just paranoid, but to me, this study seems one step too close to genetic profiling for some vaguely identifiable quality that deviates from "the norm".