This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication

trusted source


NASA's Fermi mission sees no gamma rays from nearby supernova

NASA's Fermi mission sees no gamma rays from nearby supernova
The Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory’s 48-inch telescope captured this visible-light image of the Pinwheel galaxy (Messier 101) in June 2023. The location of supernova 2023ixf is circled. The observatory, located on Mount Hopkins in Arizona, is operated by the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian. Credit: Hiramatsu et al. 2023/Sebastian Gomez (STScI)

A nearby supernova in 2023 offered astrophysicists an excellent opportunity to test ideas about how these types of explosions boost particles, called cosmic rays, to near light-speed. But surprisingly, NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope detected none of the high-energy gamma-ray light those particles should produce.

On May 18, 2023, a supernova erupted in the nearby Pinwheel galaxy (Messier 101), located about 22 million light-years away in the constellation Ursa Major. The event, named SN 2023ixf, is the most luminous nearby supernova discovered since Fermi launched in 2008.

"Astrophysicists previously estimated that supernovae convert about 10% of their total energy into cosmic ray acceleration," said Guillem Martí-Devesa, a researcher at the University of Trieste in Italy.

"But we have never observed this process directly. With the new observations of SN 2023ixf, our calculations result in energy conversion as low as 1% within a few days after the explosion. This doesn't rule out supernovae as cosmic ray factories, but it does mean we have more to learn about their production."

The paper, led by Martí-Devesa while at the University of Innsbruck in Austria, will appear in a future edition of Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Trillions of trillions of collide with Earth's atmosphere every day. Roughly 90% of them are hydrogen nuclei—or protons—and the remainder are electrons or the nuclei of heavier elements.

Even when it doesn’t detect gamma rays, NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope helps astronomers learn more about the universe. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

Scientists have been investigating cosmic ray origins since the early 1900s, but the particles can't be traced back to their sources. Because they're electrically charged, cosmic rays change course as they travel to Earth thanks to the magnetic fields they encounter.

"Gamma rays, however, travel directly to us," said Elizabeth Hays, the Fermi project scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. "Cosmic rays produce when they interact with matter in their environment. Fermi is the most sensitive gamma-ray telescope in orbit, so when it doesn't detect an expected signal, scientists must explain the absence. Solving that mystery will build a more accurate picture of cosmic ray origins."

Astrophysicists have long suspected supernovae of being top cosmic ray contributors.

These explosions occur when a star at least eight times the sun's mass runs out of fuel. The core collapses and then rebounds, propelling a shock wave outward through the star. The shock wave accelerates particles, creating cosmic rays. When cosmic rays collide with other matter and light surrounding the star, they generate gamma rays.

Supernovae greatly impact a galaxy's interstellar environment. Their blast waves and expanding clouds of debris may persist for more than 50,000 years. In 2013, Fermi measurements showed that supernova remnants in our own Milky Way galaxy were accelerating cosmic rays, which generated gamma-ray light when they struck interstellar matter. But astronomers say the remnants aren't producing enough high-energy particles to match scientists' measurements on Earth.

One theory proposes that supernovae may accelerate the most energetic cosmic rays in our galaxy in the first few days and weeks after the initial explosion.

But supernovae are rare, occurring only a few times a century in a galaxy like the Milky Way. Out to distances of around 32 million light-years, a supernova occurs, on average, just once a year.

After a month of observations, starting when visible light telescopes first saw SN 2023ixf, Fermi had not detected gamma rays.

"Unfortunately, seeing no gamma rays doesn't mean there are no cosmic rays," said co-author Matthieu Renaud, an astrophysicist at the Montpellier Universe and Particles Laboratory, part of the National Center for Scientific Research in France. "We have to go through all the underlying hypotheses regarding acceleration mechanisms and in order to convert the absence of gamma rays into an upper limit for cosmic ray production."

The researchers propose a few scenarios that may have affected Fermi's ability to see gamma rays from the event, like the way the explosion distributed debris and the density of material surrounding the star.

Fermi's observations provide the first opportunity to study conditions right after the supernova explosion. Additional observations of SN 2023ixf at other wavelengths, new simulations and models based on this event, and future studies of other young supernovae will help astronomers hone in on the mysterious sources of the universe's cosmic rays.

More information: G. Martí-Devesa et al, Early-time gamma-ray constraints on cosmic-ray acceleration in the core-collapse SN 2023ixf with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Astronomy & Astrophysics (2024). DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349061

Journal information: Astronomy & Astrophysics

Citation: NASA's Fermi mission sees no gamma rays from nearby supernova (2024, April 16) retrieved 25 May 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Exploding stars are rare but emit torrents of radiation—one close enough to Earth could threaten life on the planet


Feedback to editors