This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

How fruit flies control the brain's 'steering wheel'

How fruit flies control the brain's 'steering wheel'
The goal-dependent scaling of PFL3 spike-rate tuning curves is not a simple consequence of the fly’s instantaneous walking dynamics. a, Heatmap showing mean PFL3 spiking activity as a function of heading (x-axis) and forward walking velocity (y-axis). We combined our six recordings from right PFL3 neurons with our 15 recordings from left PFL3 neurons by flipping the heading-relative-to-the-cell’s-preferred-heading prior to averaging. b, Heatmap showing mean PFL3 spiking activity as a function of heading (x-axis) and turning velocity (y-axis). In this panel, we flipped the flies’ turning velocity for the right PFL3 neuron recordings so that we could combine their data with the left PFL3 recordings. c, Given that PFL3 spiking activity varies with the flies’ locomotor behavior and because flies that perform menotaxis show different walking statistics depending on their angular orientation relative to the goal11—flies walk forward faster when aligned with their goal, for example—one possibility is that the goal-dependent modulation observed in PFL3 activity is not due to a genuine goal input. To address this possibility, we replotted the population-averaged, PFL3 spike-rate tuning curves to heading, parsed by the flies’ goal angle—as in Fig. 3f—but in this case, we only included timepoints when the fly was nominally standing still. Our criteria for the fly standing still was that the filtered forward walking velocity was below 0.5 mm/s and the fly’s turning velocity was between −5 °/s and 5 °/s. For right PFL3 neurons, the goal-heading-relative-to-the-cells’-preferred-heading values were flipped prior to averaging. Thin lines: individual cells; thick lines: mean across cells. That a qualitatively similar scaling in the amplitude of PFL3 tuning curves is observed when flies are standing still or nearly still suggests that PFL3 goal-direction modulation is not a simple consequence of the fly’s walking dynamics but is more likely generated by FC2 inputs or some similar goal-input signals, which maintain a baseline activity level in standing flies (Extended Data Fig. 3q). d, Mean forward walking velocity, analyzed as described in panel c. e, Mean turning velocity, analyzed as described in panel c. Credit: Nature (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-07006-3

When we walk down the street, we have an internal sense of which way we are heading from looking at street signals and physical landmarks and also a sense of where we'd like to go. But how does the brain coordinate between these directions, doing the mental math that tells us which way to turn?

Now, new research describes such a neural process in , providing insight into how an animal's steers it in the right direction. The study, published in Nature, shows how neurons that signal the direction in which a fly is currently oriented work together with neurons that signal the direction in which way the fly wishes to be oriented––its goal direction—to form a circuit that guides the animal.

"The fundamental question is how brains enable navigation," says Rockefeller's Gaby Maimon. "In this study, we describe neurons that provide goal-direction signals alongside a brain circuit that uses these signals to direct steering."

The cells responsible for signaling which way a fly is oriented in the world (known as "compass" neurons) were first discovered in 2015. A few years later, work from the Maimon lab, and others demonstrated that flies with defective compass neurons are unable to navigate in a straight line along any arbitrary goal direction.

Building on that discovery, Peter Mussells Pires, a student in Maimon's lab and the lead author of this paper, set out to discover the cells responsible for keeping track of a fly's goal angle.

Pires and colleagues used two-photon microscopy to monitor flies' neurons while the insects walked on an air-levitated ball in a virtual environment. Whenever the researchers rotated the , the activity of the fly's compass neurons rotated in the brain as well. Interestingly, however, a population of cells identified as FC2 neurons remained unmoved and focused on the original heading.

"Imagine walking uptown in Manhattan, and someone pulls your shoulder and turns you east. Something in your brain continues to track which way is north so that you can return to your original heading," Maimon explains. "In flies, these are FC2 neurons."

To confirm the role of FC2 neurons in tracking a goal, the team used optogenetics—a technique that uses light to control the activity of neurons. By manipulating the activity of FC2 cells, the researchers were able to change the fly's navigation direction in predictable ways. "This was the experiment that really convinced us that these cells can actually determine the fly's goal," Pires says.

Mental math

With heading neurons and goal neurons identified, the team shifted its focus to the brain circuit responsible for combining the two signals. Recent work fleshing out the fly brain connectome—a map detailing the connections between different neurons—helped the researchers zero in on the circuit in question. The connectome made clear that a set of cells, called PFL3 cells, receive inputs from both the compass and goal neurons.

A series of experiments confirmed that PFL3 neurons tell the fly's body which way to turn by influencing the brain's motor system. They do so by comparing internal heading and goal inputs, functioning a bit like the steering wheel of the fly's navigation system. Larry Abbott, a theorist at Columbia University, collaborated with the team to develop a mathematical understanding of the system.

Abbott's model captured how compass and goal signals, which are represented in world or map coordinates (for example, north/east/south/west), are converted into motor-related signals in the body's coordinate system—that is, left and right turns. Complementary results on PFL , closely tied to the present study, are detailed in a parallel Nature paper.

Future work from the Maimon lab will focus on how flies build and store longer-term spatial memories and goals to guide behavior; the goal signal characterized in this study only explains what the flies will do in the next few seconds. Maimon is also curious to learn whether these new findings might catalyze the discovery of similar brain circuits in mammals and, ultimately, humans.

"By studying the fly brain," he says, "we have provided an initial glimpse into how a simple 'thought' is converted into an action. Hopefully, these findings will allow us to understanding more complex forms of this process in mammals down the road."

More information: Gaby Maimon, Converting an allocentric goal into an egocentric steering signal, Nature (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-07006-3. www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-07006-3

Rachel Wilson, Transforming a head direction signal into a goal-oriented steering command, Nature (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07039-2. www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07039-2

Journal information: Nature

Citation: How fruit flies control the brain's 'steering wheel' (2024, February 7) retrieved 28 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2024-02-fruit-flies-brain-wheel.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Fruit flies find their way by setting navigational goals

13 shares

Feedback to editors