This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

Atmospheres in the TRAPPIST-1 system should be long gone

Atmospheres in the TRAPPIST-1 System Should be Long Gone
Apparent sizes seen from a Trappist-1 planet. Credit: NASA/Brian Koberlein

Trappist-1 is a fascinating exoplanetary system. Seven worlds orbiting a red dwarf star just 40 light-years away. All of the worlds are similar to Earth in mass and size, and three or four of them are potentially habitable. Imagine exploring a system of life-rich worlds within easy traveling distance of each other. It's a wonderful dream, but as a new study shows it isn't likely that life exists in the system. It's more likely the planets are barren and stripped of their atmospheres.

The Trappist system has gained a lot of attention since its discovery in 2017, because at first blush it seems to be a perfect system for . Plenty of warm terrestrial worlds, similar to our inner solar system. But one question was whether red dwarf stars are suited for habitable worlds. Red dwarfs are much cooler than the sun, so any habitable world would need to orbit the star very closely. Red dwarfs are also known to have intense solar flares, which can bake nearby planets in X-rays and other dangers. Could life survive these threats over a span of billions of years? If Trappist-1 is typical, the answer seems to be no.

A new study published in Astronomy & Astrophysics looks at the potential atmospheres of the Trappist planets. Observations from JWST have confirmed that the two innermost planets lack any meaningful atmosphere, but that was expected. In our own system, Mercury has no atmosphere. But it has been generally thought that the cooler and more distant worlds of Trappist-1 could maintain atmospheres. So the team looked to .

Given of Trappist-1 and other red dwarf stars, the authors calculated the amount of high-energy radiation the star likely emits over time. They then simulated the effects of that radiation on the possible early atmospheres of the outer Trappist exoplanets. From that, they modeled the rate of atmospheric evaporation. All planets lose a bit of atmosphere over time, even Earth. The question is how much and how quickly. The team found that for the Trappist worlds, the answer is a lot and fast.

Based on the current radiation levels of Trappist-1, even its would lose an Earth's atmosphere worth of gases within a few hundred million years. Planets such as Earth, Mars, and Venus had very thick atmospheres in their youth, so we could assume the Trappist worlds would have as well. But young red dwarfs give off even more high-energy radiation, so atmospheres would evaporate at an even faster rate. Since Trappist-1 is a bit older than our sun, about 8 billion years old, any atmosphere the Trappist worlds might have had is likely long gone.

So the Trappist-1 system is likely little more than a collection of warm, dry rocks. And this could be true for most other red dwarf systems. That has some pretty serious implications for the possibility of extraterrestrial life. Red dwarfs make up about 75% of stars in our galaxy, compared to only 8% for sun-like stars. If red dwarfs strip the of their worlds, then most are lifeless.

So look around. The vibrant living you see may be much more rare than we thought.

More information: Gwenaƫl Van Looveren et al, Airy worlds or barren rocks? On the survivability of secondary atmospheres around the TRAPPIST-1 planets, Astronomy & Astrophysics (2024). DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348079. On arXiv: DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2401.16490

Provided by Universe Today

Citation: Atmospheres in the TRAPPIST-1 system should be long gone (2024, February 5) retrieved 28 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2024-02-atmospheres-trappist.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

TRAPPIST-1c isn't the exo-Venus we were hoping for, but don't blame the star

61 shares

Feedback to editors