This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

New study shows surprising effects of fire in North America's boreal forests

New study shows surprising effects of fire in North America's boreal forests
Boreal forest in northern Canada. Credit: Logan Berner

A new study, using a first-of-its-kind approach to analyze satellite imagery from boreal forests over the last three decades, has found that fire may be changing the face of the region in a way researchers did not previously anticipate.

Historically, fires in North American have led to coniferous trees being supplanted by deciduous trees, which are faster growing, take up more carbon and reflect more light, leading to cooling of the climate and decreased likelihood of fire.

The study, led by Northern Arizona University and published today in Nature Climate Change, found that surprisingly, while forests do become more deciduous, they don't stay that way; a few decades later, the same forests gradually start to shift back toward coniferous trees.

Researchers also found that the abrupt loss of coniferous forests caused by wildfire was offset by the gradual increase in coniferous forests in areas that had not recently burned, so there was no overall shift toward deciduous cover.

"We confirmed that fires clearly shift forests from conifer to deciduous cover, but when we look at those changes over many decades, we find begin to be replaced again by conifer trees three to four decades following fire," said Scott Goetz, Regents' professor in the School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems (SICCS) at Northern Arizona University and study co-author. "There are tremendous dynamics taking place, but when we tally those all up, the net feedbacks to climate were fairly small."

"This was somewhat surprising because several recent studies suggested there were shifts toward deciduous forests at local to regional scales," said Logan Berner, assistant research professor in SICCS and study co-author. "While our study indicates there have not been wholesale shifts in composition during recent decades, we anticipate that continued climate warming and increased wildfire activity could lead to pronounced changes in forest composition over the coming decades."

New study shows surprising effects of fire in North America's boreal forests
Change in deciduous fraction, tree canopy cover, albedo and seasonal forcing between 2000 and 2015. a, Data are presented as mean change with ± s.d. in per-pixel deciduous fraction and tree canopy cover inside fire perimeters by fire occurrence date. b, Area with small (under ±0.1) and large (over ±0.1) changes in deciduous fraction and tree canopy cover by three fire age classes (1) old (1950–1978), (2) intermediate (1979–1998) and (3) recent (1999–2018). c, Area with small (under ±0.1) and large (beyond ±0.1) changes in deciduous fraction and tree canopy cover within fire perimeters (1) and for the boreal domain (2). d, Mean change in spring and summer albedo with ± s.d. inside fire perimeters. e, Mean radiative forcing by the three seasonal and fire age classes with ± 1 s.d. bars. f, Mean seasonal radiative forcing with ± 1 s.d. bars within the fire perimeters (1) and for the North American boreal domain (2). Note here Δ represents change in the represented variable between 2000 and 2015. The gray dashed lines in a and d indicate the date ranges of Landsat images used in the 2000 and 2015 deciduous fraction and tree canopy cover products. The axes above and below the zero line in b indicate non-negative values. The number of 30 m × 30 m pixels used to calculate mean and standard deviation are indicated below the e and f plots. Credit: Nature Climate Change (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41558-023-01851-w

The researchers note this may not be permanent; recent decades have seen an uptick in fire disturbance in these forests, so in the future, the return to coniferous cover may take longer than it has in the past. As the climate continues to get warmer and drier, that also will affect how forests burn and how they recover.

"As we think about fire management approaches, including efforts to reduce and mitigate fire risk to and infrastructure, this study provides a critical foundation for future research," said Brendan Rogers, associate scientist at Woodwell Climate Research Center and study co-author.

"Especially after a summer of record-breaking fires in Canada, understanding how the composition of these forests will shift and respond to fire over time is crucial to informing best management practices and protecting people and the planet."

The team conducted the research as part of NASA's Arctic Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE), of which Goetz is the Science Team Lead.

As part of their project within ABoVE, they used high-resolution of the boreal forests across Alaska and Canada captured by the Landsat series of satellites to quantify changes in forest composition, both in areas that have burned and those that haven't. They also quantified the effects of changing forests using satellite measurements of surface reflectivity and calculated the feedback effects on climate.

More information: Massey, R., et al, Forest composition change and biophysical climate feedbacks across boreal North America, Nature Climate Change (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41558-023-01851-w. www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01851-w

Journal information: Nature Climate Change

Citation: New study shows surprising effects of fire in North America's boreal forests (2023, October 23) retrieved 28 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2023-10-effects-north-america-boreal-forests.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Boreal forests may be on verge of contraction: New study

229 shares

Feedback to editors