This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication

trusted source


Carbon-capture tree plantations threaten tropical biodiversity for little gain, ecologists say

Carbon-capture tree plantations threaten tropical biodiversity for little gain, ecologists say
Forest. Credit: Jesús Aguirre Gutiérrez

The increasingly urgent climate crisis has led to a boom in commercial tree plantations in an attempt to offset excess carbon emissions. However, authors of an opinion paper published in the journal Trends in Ecology & Evolution argue that these carbon-offset plantations might come with costs for biodiversity and other ecosystem functions. Instead, the authors say we should prioritize conserving and restoring intact ecosystems.

"Despite the broad range of and services provided by , society has reduced value of these ecosystems to just one metric—carbon," write the authors, led by Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez of the Environmental Change Institute at the University of Oxford. "Current and new policy should not promote ecosystem degradation via tree plantations with a narrow view on carbon capture."

Tropical ecosystems, which include forests, grasslands, and savannas, are attractive sites for tree plantations because their climate and promote rapid tree growth (and rapid tree growth means rapid carbon capture). Although some tree plantations involve reforestation of degraded land, in many cases they involve afforestation—planting forests in undegraded and previously unforested regions such as grasslands.

It's often assumed that tree planting for carbon capture also benefits biodiversity and enhances socioeconomic benefits, but the authors argue that this is usually not the case. Tropical ecosystems are highly biodiverse, and they provide multiple , such as maintaining water quality, soil health, and pollination. In comparison, carbon-capture plantations are usually monocultures and are dominated globally by just five —teak, mahogany, cedar, silk oak, and black wattle—that are grown for timber, pulp, or agroforestry.

Although these plantations might be economically valuable, they usually support a lower level of biodiversity. For example, in the Brazilian Cerrado savanna, a 40% increase in woody cover reduced the diversity of plants and ants by approximately 30%. These plantations can also directly degrade ecosystems by reducing stream flow, depleting groundwater, and acidifying soils.

The authors argue that even ambitious commitments to carbon-capture plantations will be limited in their ability to capture carbon. "The current trend of carbon-focused tree planting is taking us along the path of large-scale biotic and functional homogenization for little carbon gain," the authors write. "An area equivalent to the total summed area of U.S., UK, China, and Russia would have to be forested to sequester one year of emissions."

And tropical grasslands and savannas are already carbon sinks. When intact, tropical grasslands and savannas store large quantities of carbon below ground. In contrast to carbon-capture tree plantations, which predominantly store carbon above ground, these below-ground carbon sinks—which would be lost if afforested—are less susceptible to disturbances such as drought and fire.

The authors say that there are considerable financial incentives for private companies to offset their by investing in carbon capture and that the boom in carbon-capture plantations is being driven by money, not ecology.

Compared to parameters such as biodiversity and ecosystem services, carbon is easy to measure and monetize. But overemphasizing the benefits of tree planting for carbon capture "can disincentive the protection of intact ecosystems and can lead to negative trade-offs between , biodiversity, and ecosystem function," the authors write.

Instead of focusing on commercial tree planting, the authors say we should prioritize conserving intact . "An overarching view on maintaining original ecosystem functioning and maximizing as many ecosystem services as possible should be prioritized above the ongoing economic focus on projects," they write.

More information: Valuing the functionality of tropical ecosystems beyond carbon, Trends in Ecology & Evolution (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.08.012

Journal information: Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Provided by Cell Press

Citation: Carbon-capture tree plantations threaten tropical biodiversity for little gain, ecologists say (2023, October 3) retrieved 5 December 2023 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Biodiverse forests better at storing carbon for long periods, says study


Feedback to editors