This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

Replication of prior studies fails to find purported evidence of magnetic sensing in fruit flies

Replication of prior studies fails to find purported evidence of magnetic sensing in fruit flies
Testing of Drosophila magnetic sensing in the gravity negative-geotaxis assay. a, Schematic of the apparatus. A desktop computer (1), situated outside the shielded chamber, controlled the power supplies (2), the switching box (3) and the double-wrapped three-dimensional Merritt four-coil system (4). Large parts of the 12 coils have been omitted for visual clarity. Tubes containing the flies (5) were placed in the center of the coils. Temperature, light and magnetic field sensors (6) monitored the experiments continuously. These sensors were connected to a laptop (7) that also controlled the video camera (8). The flies were illuminated with UV-blue, blue or red light via an array of LEDs (9). A second LED array (10) generated infrared light for filming. b, Climbing behavior of CS-LE flies under blue light (410–490 nm), showing the time dependence of the proportion of flies reaching 15 cm when exposed to a 300 µT magnetic field compared with sham exposure conditions with no applied magnetic field. Data are shown as mean (thick lines) and mean ± confidence interval (thin lines) for proportion data. Gray dashed line indicates the proportion of flies able to climb 15 cm in 15 s. c, Average height climbed by flies as a function of time (same conditions as b). Data are shown as mean (thick lines) and mean ± s.d. (thin lines). No significant difference between sham (0 μT) and exposed (300 µT) conditions was found. b,c, Data for 15 groups of ten flies in each condition (exposed and sham). Nature (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06397-7

A team of neurosensory researchers from the University of Oxford, Universität Oldenburg and the University of Exeter has replicated landmark studies reporting magnetic sensing in Drosophila fruit flies and failed to find any evidence for it. In their study, reported in the journal Nature, the group meticulously replicated work done by two prior teams with vastly different results. A News and Views piece in the same journal issue discusses the results produced by the team.

In 2008, a team of biologists set out to test the possibility of magnetic sensing in —prior efforts had suggested it might exist, but it not been proven. In their effort, the team trained approximately 100 fruit files to associate food with a magnetic field that was stronger than Earth's. The flies were then exposed to a magnetic field in a device built by the team to determine whether they responded in desired ways compared to in the absence of a . They reported that behavior by the flies in the device strongly suggested magnetic sensing in fruit flies.

The 2008 findings set off a flurry of research activity, much of which centered on determining the mechanism in the flies that sensed and responded to magnetism. None were found. In 2014, another team tested magnetic sensing in fruit flies using an entirely different approach involving the ability of the flies to climb against gravity and when affected by dim blue lights. They found that the climbing ability of the flies was impacted by the presence of a strong magnet. This finding bolstered the results of the prior studies, leading most in the field to accept magnetic sensing in fruit flies.

In this new effort, the research team noted the lack of progress in finding the mechanism responsible for magnetic sensing in fruit flies in the ensuing years. Sensing that there may have been errors in the prior work, they attempted to replicate the results of both research efforts.

In replicating the prior two efforts, the researchers made some small adjustments. They conducted them in a more secure environment to ensure that no other factors might be impacting the behavior of their test flies. They also tested a lot more flies.

The researchers found no evidence of magnetic sensing in flies in either approach, and suggest that the results of both teams was likely due to .

More information: Marco Bassetto et al, No evidence for magnetic field effects on the behaviour of Drosophila, Nature (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06397-7

Eric J. Warrant, Replication study casts doubt on magnetic sensing in flies, Nature (2023). DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-02489-6

Journal information: Nature

© 2023 Science X Network

Citation: Replication of prior studies fails to find purported evidence of magnetic sensing in fruit flies (2023, August 10) retrieved 30 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2023-08-replication-prior-purported-evidence-magnetic.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Male fruit flies found to transfer chemical to females to induce sleep, so they won't mate with other males

75 shares

Feedback to editors