This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

Electronic noses sniff out volatile organic compounds

Electronic noses sniff out volatile organic compounds
E-noses combine arrays of chemical sensors with pattern recognition techniques to recognize odors. Credit: Hu, W., Wan, L., Jian, Y., Ren, C., Jin, K., Su, X., Bai, X., Haick, H., Yao, M., Wu, W., Advanced Materials Technologies. 2019, 4, 1800488. 10.1002/admt.201800488

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are chemicals emitted as gases that can have adverse health effects. They are often found in paints, pharmaceuticals, and refrigerants, among other common products, but they can also act as markers of explosives, insect infestation, food spoilage, and disease.

Tracing VOCs is important for and all "smell" related issues. To this end, Liu and colleagues introduced a fluid mechanics-based chamber design for an (e-nose) that consistently detects VOCs at low concentrations. The strategy, which includes using a shunt-like device to control the behavior of fluid flow, is a step forward in e-nose technology development. Their article "Controlling fluidic behavior for ultrasensitive volatile sensing" was published in Applied Physics Reviews on May 23, 2023.

Methods for detecting VOCs face many challenges in terms of selectivity, sensitivity, reproducibility, and stability. E-noses, inspired by the olfactory system, can overcome some of these barriers by combining arrays of chemical sensors with pattern recognition techniques to recognize odors.

However, many e-noses generate different signals toward VOCs of the same concentration when the sensor is located in different parts of the "nose" chamber.

"To counteract this problem, the fluidic behavior of the gas flow needs to be well controlled," said author Weiwei Wu. "This ensures a uniform fluidic field and concentration of VOCs in the chamber and avoids generating any fake sensing characteristics."

The starting e-nose design featured a vertical chamber that looks much like a showerhead. This promotes vertical flow as gas spreads through holes at the bottom of the device and around to evenly distributed sensors.

Using fluid mechanics simulations, the team optimized the volume, symmetry, hole location, and sensor location of their e-nose chamber. They added a shunt-like device to promote and shorten response time.

Based on their simulation results, the researchers fabricated a Teflon chamber and measured the sensing performance of their e-nose. They compared two chambers, one with the shunt and one without. The chamber with the shunt device consistently performed around 1.3 times better at sensing an example VOC.

In the future, the authors plan to focus on minimizing the chamber and improving the structure further to decrease response and recovery time.

"E-nose research is a highly interdisciplinary field," said Wu. "Chemists, physicists, biologists, , and need to work together to solve issues including effective sensing that considers the fundamental mechanisms of absorption/desorption, algorithms that achieve precise recognition of VOCs more quickly and with lower energy consumption, and how new technologies, such as memristors, should be involved."

More information: Controlling fluidic behavior for ultrasensitive volatile sensing, Applied Physics Reviews (2023). DOI: 10.1063/5.0141840

Citation: Electronic noses sniff out volatile organic compounds (2023, May 23) retrieved 12 June 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2023-05-electronic-noses-volatile-compounds.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Why can't we replace sniffer dogs with electronic noses?

43 shares

Feedback to editors