This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

Understanding the long-term impact of climate change on Indian crops

Understanding the long-term impact of climate change on Indian crops
Estimated climate change impacts over quantiles for rice crop at mean Tmax and precipitation for naïve models (R1 and R2) and penalty inclusive model (R2P). Notes: R1 is the naïve model using the data for the period of 1966–2015 and R2 is the naïve model using data for the period of 1986–2015. Quantile and fixed effect in parentheses indicate that the models are estimated using quantile and fixed effect regression models. Shaded area indicates confidence interval. Longrun and Shortrun indicate long-run and short-run impacts; and quantile and fixed effect in parenthesis denote that the models are estimated using quantile and fixed effect regressions. Shaded area is an indicator of confidence intervals. Credit: Agricultural Economics (2023). DOI: 10.1111/agec.12765

Over the past few decades, it has become obvious that climate change, and consequent extreme weather events, can wreak havoc on crop yields. Concerningly, there is a large disparity in agricultural vulnerability between developed and developing countries. In a new study, researchers have looked at major food grains in India to understand the long- and short-term effects of climate change on crop yields.

"Most studies that measure the effects of are looking at year-to-year changes, which are representative of variations in weather and not climate," said Madhu Khanna (CABBI), a professor of agriculture and consumer economics. "We used data across 60 years to examine how deviations in weather from long-term averages affect the yields of three major cereal crops: rice, maize, and wheat."

Changes in weather are short term, like a hot day with a sudden thunderstorm. However, such variations may be distinct from long-term differences, which are the hallmark of climate change. "We were looking to see if the effect of short-term deviations in and precipitation are significant when compared to their long-term averages and if their effects are absent in the long term as farmers adapt to climate change," Khanna said.

The researchers used quantile regression models to determine if farmers were adapting to the long-term changes in climate. To do so, they used 60-year data sets on temperature, precipitation, the length of the growing season, and crop yield to create different models for short-term and long-term responses of crops.

According to their analysis, if differences in temperature, for example, have no impact in either model, there have been no adaptations. On the other hand, if the short-term impact is worse, it means that the farmers have been able to adapt and smooth out the effects.

"We found that the farmers were able to adapt to changes in temperature for rice and maize but not wheat. Increased precipitation enhanced rice yield, but adversely affected wheat and maize yields," Khanna said. "We also found that farmers are customizing their strategies across different regions and crops. For example, heat-prone districts fared better to higher temperatures compared to districts in colder regions."

"The impacts are higher at the lower tail of the distribution, but are lower at the upper tail of the distribution," said Surender Kumar, a professor of economics at the University of Delhi, India. Farmers who worked in areas that were less productive, and therefore at the lower tail of distribution, differed in their response to those who worked in areas where the yields were higher—the former took more adaptation measures due to higher impacts.

"Higher productive regions have better irrigation facilities and are less dependent on the monsoon, and so the difference between long-term and short-term impacts is negligible," Kumar said.

There are two ways by which the crops can adapt: the farmers can change their management practices or the varieties themselves are hardier. Although this study cannot distinguish between these possibilities, it suggests that action can be taken to improve seed varieties and educate farmers on how they can adapt to changing climate.

"This study is a part of our overall effort to build understanding across different countries. In the past we did a similar study in the US and now we're doing it for India. It's interesting that the results of this study are telling us that in both countries, although there is a negative impact of climate, the crops are adapting," Khanna said.

"However, these effects differ across crops and across the type of effects they are adapting to. We need to take a holistic view of all the various ways in which changing climate effects yield, which is obviously a very challenging and complex problem, and understand that focusing on particular dimensions of climate change and adapting crops may not be sufficient."

The study "Distributional heterogeneity in change impacts and adaptation: Evidence from Indian agriculture" was published in Agricultural Economics .

More information: Surender Kumar et al, Distributional heterogeneity in climate change impacts and adaptation: Evidence from Indian agriculture, Agricultural Economics (2023). DOI: 10.1111/agec.12765

Citation: Understanding the long-term impact of climate change on Indian crops (2023, April 24) retrieved 18 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2023-04-long-term-impact-climate-indian-crops.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Crop yields reduced by climate extremes, finds study

10 shares

Feedback to editors