This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication

trusted source


Switching to hydrogen fuel could prolong the methane problem

Switching to hydrogen fuel could prolong the methane problem
The hydrogen economy could increase levels of atmospheric methane. Credit: Bumper DeJesus, Princeton University

Hydrogen's potential as a clean fuel could be limited by a chemical reaction in the lower atmosphere, according to research from Princeton University and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association.

This is because gas easily reacts in the atmosphere with the same molecule primarily responsible for breaking down methane, a potent greenhouse gas. If hydrogen emissions exceed a certain threshold, that shared reaction will likely lead to methane accumulating in the atmosphere—with decades-long climate consequences.

"Hydrogen is theoretically the fuel of the future," said Matteo Bertagni, a postdoctoral researcher at the High Meadows Environmental Institute working on the Carbon Mitigation Initiative. "In practice, though, it poses many environmental and technological concerns that still need to be addressed."

Bertagni is the first author of a research article published in Nature Communications, in which researchers modeled the effect of hydrogen emissions on atmospheric methane. They found that above a certain threshold, even when replacing fossil fuel usage, a leaky hydrogen economy could cause near-term environmental harm by increasing the amount of methane in the atmosphere. The risk for harm is compounded for methods using methane as an input, highlighting the critical need to manage and minimize emissions from hydrogen production.

"We have a lot to learn about the consequences of using hydrogen, so the switch to hydrogen, a seemingly , doesn't create new environmental challenges," said Amilcare Porporato, Thomas J. Wu '94 Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the High Meadows Environmental Institute. Porporato is a principal investigator and member of the Leadership Team for the Carbon Mitigation Initiative and is also associated faculty at the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment.

The problem boils down to one small, difficult-to-measure molecule known as the hydroxyl radical (OH). Often dubbed "the detergent of the troposphere," OH plays a critical role in eliminating greenhouse gases such as methane and ozone from the atmosphere.

The hydroxyl radical also reacts with in the atmosphere. And since a limited amount of OH is generated each day, any spike in hydrogen emissions means that more OH would be used to break down hydrogen, leaving less OH available to break down methane. As a consequence, methane would stay longer in the atmosphere, extending its warming impacts.

According to Bertagni, the effects of a hydrogen spike that might occur as government incentives for hydrogen production expand could have decades-long climate consequences for the planet.

"If you emit some hydrogen into the atmosphere now, it will lead to a progressive build-up of methane in the following years," Bertagni said. "Even though hydrogen only has a lifespan of around two years in the atmosphere, you'll still have the methane feedback from that hydrogen in 30 years from now."

Switching to hydrogen fuel could prolong the methane problem
The hydrogen economy could increase levels of atmospheric methane. Credit: Bumper DeJesus Tangled hydrogen (H2) and methane (CH4) budgets. Sketch of H2 and CH4 tropospheric budgets and their interconnections: (1) the competition for OH; (2) the production of H2 from CH4 oxidation; (3) the potential emissions [minimum-maximum] due to a more hydrogen-based energy system. Arrows are scaled with mass flux intensity, CH4 scale being 10 times narrower than H2 scale. On a per-mole basis, H2 consumes only around 3 times less OH than CH4. ppq = part per quadrillon (10−15). Credit: Nature Communications (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35419-7

In the study, the researchers identified the tipping point at which hydrogen emissions would lead to an increase in atmospheric methane and thereby undermine some of the near-term benefits of hydrogen as a clean fuel. By identifying that threshold, the researchers established targets for managing hydrogen emissions.

"It's imperative that we are proactive in establishing thresholds for hydrogen emissions, so that they can be used to inform the design and implementation of future hydrogen infrastructure," said Porporato.

For hydrogen referred to as green hydrogen, which is produced by splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen using electricity from renewable sources, Bertagni said that the critical threshold for hydrogen emissions sits at around 9%. That means that if more than 9% of the green hydrogen produced leaks into the atmosphere—whether that be at the point of production, sometime during transport, or anywhere else along the value chain—atmospheric methane would increase over the next few decades, canceling out some of the climate benefits of switching away from fossil fuels.

And for blue hydrogen, which refers to hydrogen produced via methane reforming with subsequent carbon capture and storage, the threshold for emissions is even lower. Because methane itself is the primary input for the process of methane reforming, blue hydrogen producers have to consider direct methane leakage in addition to hydrogen leakage. For example, the researchers found that even with a methane leakage rate as low as 0.5%, hydrogen leakages would have to be kept under around 4.5% to avoid increasing atmospheric methane concentrations.

"Managing leakage rates of hydrogen and methane will be critical," Bertagni said. "If you have just a small amount of methane leakage and a bit of hydrogen leakage, then the blue hydrogen that you produce really might not be much better than using fossil fuels, at least for the next 20 to 30 years."

The researchers emphasized the importance of the time scale over which the effect of hydrogen on is considered. Bertagni said that in the long-term (over the course of a century, for instance), the switch to a hydrogen economy would still likely deliver net benefits to the climate, even if methane and hydrogen leakage levels are high enough to cause near-term warming. Eventually, he said, atmospheric gas concentrations would reach a new equilibrium, and the switch to a hydrogen economy would demonstrate its climate benefits. But before that happens, the potential near-term consequences of hydrogen emissions might lead to irreparable environmental and socioeconomic damage.

Thus, if institutions hope to meet mid-century climate goals, Bertagni cautioned that hydrogen and leakage to the must be held in check as hydrogen infrastructure begins to roll out. And because hydrogen is a small molecule that is notoriously difficult to control and measure, he explained that managing emissions will likely require researchers to develop better methods for tracking hydrogen losses across the value chain.

"If companies and governments are serious about investing money to develop hydrogen as a resource, they have to make sure they are doing it correctly and efficiently," Bertagni said. "Ultimately, the hydrogen economy has to be built in a way that won't counteract the efforts in other sectors to mitigate carbon emissions."

More information: Matteo B. Bertagni et al, Risk of the hydrogen economy for atmospheric methane, Nature Communications (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35419-7

Journal information: Nature Communications

Citation: Switching to hydrogen fuel could prolong the methane problem (2023, March 13) retrieved 24 February 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Using edge-decorated nanocarbons for sustainable hydrogen production


Feedback to editors