Early stone tools were not rocket science

Early stone tools were not rocket science
One participant of the study—who was naive to stone tools as well as any of their production techniques—uses the so-called bipolar technique. The resulting tool is seen centrally in the lower right. Credit: William D. Snyder et al

Archaeologically excavated stone tools—some as much as 2.6 million years old—have been hailed as evidence for an early cultural heritage in human evolution. But are these tools proof that our ancestors were already becoming human, both mentally and culturally?

Dr. Claudio Tennie and William Snyder from the Department of Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology at the University of Tübingen (Germany) have tested this traditional interpretation. They draw a different conclusion: as shown by an experimental study, the earliest techniques for making can be spontaneously reinvented even without cultural transmission. They therefore are not evidence for the beginning of human culture, which possibly may have started much later, the researchers judge. The study was published in Science Advances.

Tools made from scratch

The authors asked 28 study participants (local adults, who did not study archaeology) to open a box containing monetary rewards. Participants were free to use provided —a painted glass hemisphere, a medium sized river pebble and a large granite block—in whatever manner they deemed suitable to break a rope that kept the box shut.

They were not given any information, let alone demonstrations and 25 participants proved—via post-test questionnaires—to have been naïve at the start of test with regard to production techniques of early stone tools. Despite their naivety, the majority innovated at least one of these techniques and proceeded to make and use the resulting tools to cut the rope locking the puzzle box. The authors found that every single production technique of early stone tools was thus re-innovated on the spot—from scratch—across the naïve participants.

Early stone tools were not rocket science
2.6 million years old (A) and 1.7 million years old stone tools and an example of a result of the current experiment with subjects without prior knowledge (artifact C). Credit: William D. Snyder et al

"These data contradict earlier claims that learning how to make any stone tools must be inherently difficult and that it therefore is impossible to do in the absence of models to copy," says Claudio Tennie. "If the earliest stone tools in the human record really had been the first cases of human culture, then they should resist spontaneous innovation—they should not come about anew 'from scratch,' in the absence of cultural transmission."

"When we asked other researchers about it before revealing our results, most did not predict this outcome. They strongly believed that all stone making requires copying. But it does not," says Tennie.

"That tools existed 2.6 million years ago is no longer reliable 'smoking gun' evidence that our ancestors in the earliest Stone Age had culture like our own," Snyder says. "We must now look at much later time periods for the origin of modern human culture."

More information: William D. Snyder et al, Early knapping techniques do not necessitate cultural transmission, Science Advances (2022). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abo2894

Journal information: Science Advances

Citation: Early stone tools were not rocket science (2022, July 6) retrieved 30 November 2023 from https://phys.org/news/2022-07-early-stone-tools-rocket-science.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Chimpanzees have not entered the stone age


Feedback to editors