Brain capacity compared in humans and birds

Brain capacity compared in humans and birds
Behavioral overview. (A) Behavioral paradigm (reproduced from Balakhonov and Rose, 2017). The birds had to center and hold their gaze for the duration of the sample and delay period, and subsequently indicate which colored square had changed. (B) Boxplot of performance for different ipsilateral loads (i.e., on the side where the change occurred). Horizontal lines indicate significant differences between loads, box indicates the median, 1st, and 3rd quartile (whiskers extend to 1.5 times the inter-quartile range). (C) Mean performance matrix for ipsi- and contralateral load combinations (values are rounded to the nearest integer). Additional contralateral items at an ipsilateral load of 1 barely affected performance (bottom row). At higher ipsilateral loads additional contralateral items reduced performance more clearly (middle and top row). Statistical modeling revealed an interaction at these higher loads. Credit: DOI: 10.7554/eLife.72783

The working memory is the brain's ability to process information for a short period of time in a retrievable state. It is essential for performing complex cognitive tasks, such as thinking, planning, following instructions or solving problems. A team of researchers from Ruhr-Universität Bochum (RUB) has now succeeded in investigating this special area of memory in birds in more detail and in comparing it to data storage in the mammalian brain. The scientists found that birds and monkeys—despite their different brain architecture—share the same central mechanisms and limits of working memory.

The researchers from the Neural Basis of Learning department at RUB have published the results in the journal eLife on 3 December 2021.

Research on the bird brain complements existing models

The capacity of is limited. Humans can only take in about four items of information simultaneously—and it was precisely this limitation that made the Bochum researchers curious. "There are various theories about how limitation occurs in the and what role the network of neurons plays in this," describes first author Lukas Hahn. "However, the existing models are based exclusively on studies in humans and other primates. We wanted to complement these with our expertise."

Hahn, who works at the Faculty of Psychology in the department of Professor Jonas Rose, specializes in researching the neuronal basis of cognition in the avian brain. "The working of some birds, such as crows, has a capacity similar to that of humans, although their brain architecture is very different from that of mammals," says Jonas Rose, head of the Neural Basis of Learning department at RUB. "We wanted to know: How can brains with such clear structural differences produce working memories with similar capacities?"

Test design transferred from macaque monkeys to carrion crows

To do this, the Bochum scientists observed crows at the Faculty of Psychology in Bochum. They tested the birds' working memory with an exercise originally developed for macaque monkeys. "We taught the crows to look at a screen and memorize a different number of colored squares there," explains Hahn. "After a pause with one second of black screen, we presented them the squares on the screen again, but slightly different. The birds were now tasked with figuring out which square had changed."

While the crows performed the task, the scientists recorded neuron activity in an area of the brain corresponding to the prefrontal cortex—the central hub of cognition in mammals. "The studies showed that the neurons in the crows' brains responded to the changing colors in virtually the same way as the neurons in monkeys," analyzes Rose. Moreover, the scientists noticed that increasing the number of items the crows had to remember altered the amount of information individual neurons encoded to the same degree that had been previously observed in monkeys.

Same mechanisms despite different brain architecture

Lukas Hahn: "The similarities between the distantly related bird and mammalian species confirm pre-existing core ideas about the limits of working memory. Moreover, they suggest that birds and apes share the same core mechanisms and limits of working memory despite their different brain architecture." And Hahn already has ideas for a follow-up project in mind, namely investigating how different regions of the ' brains process working memory signals with each other. "That would be an exciting future question to uncover more neural bases of cognition in the avian brain."

More information: Lukas Alexander Hahn et al, Working memory capacity of crows and monkeys arises from similar neuronal computations, eLife (2021). DOI: 10.7554/eLife.72783

Journal information: eLife

Citation: Brain capacity compared in humans and birds (2021, December 17) retrieved 24 May 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Neurons in crows' brains signal which pictures belong together


Feedback to editors