Many Australian frogs don't tolerate human impacts on the environment

Many Australian frogs don’t tolerate human impacts on the environment
The White-lipped Tree Frog (Litoria infrafrenata) from northern Queensland is an example of one of Australia's most tolerant frog species. Credit: Jodi Rowley

A UNSW and Australian Museum study using data from a citizen science project finds 70 percent are vulnerable to housing, agriculture, roads and recreation.

We urgently need to consider on the environment, say UNSW Sydney and Australian Museum scientists, whose study of 87 Australian found almost three-quarters were intolerant of modified habitats.

The findings, published in the journal Global Change Biology, are particularly concerning as more than 40 of Australia's 243 are already threatened with extinction.

"Frogs need to be prioritised in urban planning and conservation decisions," lead author and Ph.D. candidate Gracie Liu from UNSW Science's School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences says.

"By studying how species respond to human-driven modification, and ranking them based on their tolerance, we can prioritise the most and take appropriate conservation measures to mitigate the risk to biodiversity."

Frogs are the sign of a healthy environment, but they are one of the most threatened groups of animals on earth. Humans have played a large part in their decline by clearing and modifying native vegetation for housing, agriculture, roads, and recreation. In Australia, cities and agriculture already account for more than half of the country's .

With this in mind, the researchers developed a tolerance index to measure these effects on frogs, accounting for the multiple stressors such as roads, built up areas, farms, mines, and light pollution.

The index was based on over 126,000 frog observations from the Australian Museum's citizen science project FrogID, which was set up to monitor frog populations and help better understand and conserve Australia's frog species.

Many Australian frogs don’t tolerate human impacts on the environment
The Bleating Froglet from southwest Western Australia lives in temporary swamps in granite areas and is Australia's second most intolerant frog species. Credit: Jodi Rowley

"Thanks to thousands of people across Australia recording frogs on their mobile phones using the FrogID app, we had access to a huge number of frog observations," study UNSW co-author and lead scientist of FrogID, Dr. Jodi Rowley says.

Dr. Rowley is also curator of Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Biology at the Australian Museum.

"A dataset of this size grants us the ability to study broad trends in terms of what makes a frog tolerant or intolerant."

Alarmingly, 70 percent of frogs studied were intolerant of human modified habitats.

"Frogs that are so called 'habitat specialists' are particularly vulnerable to human impacts," Ms Liu says.

"These frogs, including the Crawling Toadlet (Pseudophryne guentheri) and the Bleating Froglet (Crinia pseudinsignifera), have specific habitat requirements that backyards, gardens and other human modified habitats just can't provide.

"Frogs that lay their eggs on land are also intolerant of habitat modification due to their strong dependence on forest resources, so there is a clear need to preserve natural habitat."

But other species, the 'tolerators', regularly turn up in people's backyards and may actually be perfectly content living there, the scientists say.

Many Australian frogs don’t tolerate human impacts on the environment
Australia’s most modification tolerant frog is the Striped Marsh Frog (Limnodynastes peronii) which is found along Australia’s eastern coastline. Credit: Jodi Rowley

"Generalists species like the Striped Marsh Frog (Limnodynastes peronii), White-lipped Tree Frog (Litoria infrafrenata) and Motorbike Frog (Litoria moorei) can make use of a variety of resources and environmental conditions and can thrive in human modified habitats," Ms Liu says.

The findings were optimistic for some frog species, with species that call from vegetation often tolerant of modified habitats.

"This suggests that in addition to preserving native habitat, frog diversity can be supported by creating green spaces and 'frog-friendly' gardens in modified areas," Dr. Rowley says.

The scientists say many more species may be hard hit if stronger conservation measures are not taken.

Ms Liu's next research will explore how habitat modification affects frog breeding seasons, movements and habitat use.

The public is being encouraged to continue the count of Australia's frogs using FrogID so UNSW and Australian Museum scientists can continue to better understand Australia's frogs, the health of our ecosystems and biodiversity in general.

"We are also using FrogID to understand basic but vital things like how many frog species we have and even discover species currently unknown to science," Dr. Rowley says.

Many Australian frogs don’t tolerate human impacts on the environment
The Ticking Frog from Western Australia’s jarrah forest is one of Australia’s least tolerant frog species. Credit: Jodi Rowley

Examples of Australia's least tolerant frog species

Of all the studied species, the Crawling Toadlet (Pseudophryne guentheri) was the least tolerant of human modified habitats. "This is a small ground-dwelling frog, no more than 4cm in body length, from southwest Western Australia," Ms Liu says.

The second most intolerant species was the Bleating Froglet (Crinia pseudinsignifera), another small frog, reaching 3cm in body length, from southwest Western Australia. It lives in temporary swamps in granite areas.

The Ticking Frog (Geocrinia leai) from Western Australia's jarrah forest was also amongst Australia's least tolerant frogs.

"The males—the sex that makes advertisement calls—live up to their name, wooing females with a continuous ticking call. The females will then lay their eggs in a cluster on land under wet leaf litter, logs, or waterside vegetation," Dr. Rowley says.

There were species that did not have enough data for the scientists to study.

"Most of these were habitat specialists, secretive species, or species that live in very remote parts of Australia—those that are likely to be even more intolerant of habitat modification," Ms Liu says.

Many Australian frogs don’t tolerate human impacts on the environment
Western Australia's Motorbike Frog is one of Australia’s most tolerant frog species. Credit: Jodi Rowley

Examples of Australia's most tolerant frog species

Australia's most modification tolerant frog was the Striped Marsh Frog (Limnodynastes peronii). Not only does this frog occupy human modified habitats, but the researchers say that it may even prefer them to natural habitats.

"This is a frog that is likely to be familiar to many of those living along Australia's eastern coastline," Ms Liu says. "It has a distinctive call that sounds a lot like a dripping tap, or a tennis ball being hit."

Coming in second was the White-lipped Tree Frog (Litoria infrafrenata), a northern Queensland species and Australia's largest frog, reaching 13.5cm in .

This frog inhabits rainforest and Melaleuca swamps, but it is not unusual for them to appear on farms and in suburban gardens.

Third place went to Western Australia's Motorbike Frog (Litoria moorei). Its mating call, as the name suggests, resembles the rumble of a motorbike.

"If you had one of these frogs in your backyard, you'd be forgiven for thinking that someone was doing burnouts on a motorbike outside your house," Ms Liu says.

Explore further

Surviving the flames: Citizen scientists reveal frogs' initial response to 'black summer' bushfires

More information: Gracie Liu et al. Species' traits drive amphibian tolerance to anthropogenic habitat modification, Global Change Biology (2021). DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15623
Journal information: Global Change Biology

Citation: Many Australian frogs don't tolerate human impacts on the environment (2021, May 4) retrieved 17 May 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors