Study: How we interact with animals sheds light on American social inequality

New research suggests our relationships with pit bulls shed light on the ways we reproduce social inequality
UC Riverside's Katja Guenther, an associate professor of gender and sexuality studies, and her rescued pit bull mix, Monkey. Credit: University of California - Riverside

To Katja Guenther, animals—and how we interact with them—can tell us a lot more about ourselves than we might think.

Guenther is an associate professor of gender and sexuality studies at the University of California, Riverside, where much of her research explores human-animal relationships. She's volunteered in animal shelters and with dog rescues for nearly a decade, and according to her, those experiences have revealed some of the less predictable ways in which are reproduced.

In an article published this fall in the journal Ethnic and Racial Studies, Guenther homes in on one group of breeds—pit bulls—to showcase what their rescue reveals about how racism, classism, and sexism are perpetuated in American society.

In the greater Los Angeles area, pit bulls comprise about a third of all in animal shelters. Their overrepresentation is partly a consequence of "breed-specific legislation"—restrictions that bar pit bulls from living in certain types of housing, for example, because of a widespread belief that they've been bred to be aggressive.

Today, pit bulls are closely linked in the American cultural imagination with dog fighting, poverty, and in Southern California, where Guenther conducts her research, with primarily lower-income black and Latino communities.

But once they enter shelters in the region, pit bulls undergo a complicated process designed to distance them from those communities of color, Guenther observed.

The end goal is to inscribe the dogs "with the animal practices of whiteness," she said, in part by constructing new narratives that position them as docile, feminized companions to mostly white, middle- and upper-class adopters.

Rescuers—whom Guenther described as overwhelmingly white, highly educated, middle-and upper-class women—accomplish this narrative-rewriting in a variety of ways:

  • On social media: Guenther said rescuers use platforms such as Facebook and Instagram to "create narratives about the dogs for public consumption, beginning with the announcement of their rescue and concluding with an announcement of their adoption." Importantly, however, these narratives are typically simplified, and "omit any discussion of how neglectful dog guardians are often trapped in poverty."
  • In photographs: When photographing adoptable dogs, rescuers dress them in feminine costumes and accessories, such as scarves and butterfly wings. "Cardinal rules of pit rescue photography include that dogs should be photographed in environments that look like middle-class homes or naturescapes, not kennels or low-income homes," Guenther added. "The dogs are always shown in states of relaxation, never barking or baring their teeth, even if in play."
  • By changing the dogs' names: Rescuers often change pit bulls' names to ones of primarily Anglo origin that are more reflective of white culture. So, while a pit bull surrendered by its owner might enter the shelter with a name like Phantom or Oso (bear in Spanish), the same dog is more likely to leave the shelter with a name like Bentley or Riley, Guenther said.

Additionally, some rescuers Guenther studied would redline entire communities, refusing to adopt dogs into homes in specific postal codes; exclude applicants with stereotypically black- or Latino-sounding names; or use real estate websites to view photos of applicants' homes or neighborhoods.

In these ways and others, rescuers perpetuate existing frameworks of social inequality that position the dogs' previous owners as culturally deficient and morally unfit to care for animals, Guenther said.

Moreover, they allow people to ignore the larger structural problems that often prevent certain owners from being able to keep their pets, such as poverty and economic precarity, homelessness and housing insecurity, housing discrimination, and overpolicing of communities of color.

"The shift we need to start to see happen is in the popular discourse that labels as 'bad' or 'irresponsible' owners," Guenther said.

Guenther doesn't believe people involved in pit bull rescue intend to reproduce racialized views of previous owners, she added. Rather, they're perpetuating cultural narratives that already exist in our society and provide us with easy answers.

"People generally resort to the easy answers," she said. "But the reality is a lot more complicated and nuanced, and that's why it's so hard for us to address issues like racism and sexism in the longer term. We're so embedded in the existing systems that the path of least resistance is to reproduce the positions of privilege we already occupy—and by extending some of that privilege to pit bulls, rescuers try to get them into what they see as the 'right' kind of home."

More information: Katja M. Guenther. "Taking the ghetto out of the dog:" reproducing inequality in pit bull rescue, Ethnic and Racial Studies (2019). DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2019.1665695

Journal information: Ethnic and Racial Studies

Citation: Study: How we interact with animals sheds light on American social inequality (2019, November 26) retrieved 28 November 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Pit bull label may triple length of stay in dog shelters


Feedback to editors